Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
null (Ed.)Abstract X and Y chromosomes are usually derived from a pair of homologous autosomes, which then diverge from each other over time. Although Y-specific features have been characterized in sex chromosomes of various ages, the earliest stages of Y chromosome evolution remain elusive. In particular, we do not know whether early stages of Y chromosome evolution consist of changes to individual genes or happen via chromosome-scale divergence from the X. To address this question, we quantified divergence between young proto-X and proto-Y chromosomes in the house fly, Musca domestica. We compared proto-sex chromosome sequence and gene expression between genotypic (XY) and sex-reversed (XX) males. We find evidence for sequence divergence between genes on the proto-X and proto-Y, including five genes with mitochondrial functions. There is also an excess of genes with divergent expression between the proto-X and proto-Y, but the number of genes is small. This suggests that individual proto-Y genes, but not the entire proto-Y chromosome, have diverged from the proto-X. We identified one gene, encoding an axonemal dynein assembly factor (which functions in sperm motility), that has higher expression in XY males than XX males because of a disproportionate contribution of the proto-Y allele to gene expression. The upregulation of the proto-Y allele may be favored in males because of this gene’s function in spermatogenesis. The evolutionary divergence between proto-X and proto-Y copies of this gene, as well as the mitochondrial genes, is consistent with selection in males affecting the evolution of individual genes during early Y chromosome evolution.more » « less
-
Abstract Sex determination, the developmental process by which sexually dimorphic phenotypes are established, evolves fast. Evolutionary turnover in a sex determination pathway may occur via selection on alleles that are genetically linked to a new master sex determining locus on a newly formed proto‐sex chromosome. Species with polygenic sex determination, in which master regulatory genes are found on multiple different proto‐sex chromosomes, are informative models to study the evolution of sex determination and sex chromosomes. House flies are such a model system, with male determining loci possible on all six chromosomes and a female‐determiner on one of the chromosomes as well. The two most common male‐determining proto‐Y chromosomes form latitudinal clines on multiple continents, suggesting that temperature variation is an important selection pressure responsible for maintaining polygenic sex determination in this species. Temperature‐dependent fitness effects could be manifested through temperature‐dependent gene expression differences across proto‐Y chromosome genotypes. These gene expression differences may be the result of
cis regulatory variants that affect the expression of genes on the proto‐sex chromosomes, ortrans effects of the proto‐Y chromosomes on genes elswhere in the genome. We used RNA‐seq to identify genes whose expression depends on proto‐Y chromosome genotype and temperature in adult male house flies. We found no evidence for ecologically meaningful temperature‐dependent expression differences of sex determining genes between male genotypes, but we were probably not sampling an appropriate developmental time‐point to identify such effects. In contrast, we identified many other genes whose expression depends on the interaction between proto‐Y chromosome genotype and temperature, including genes that encode proteins involved in reproduction, metabolism, lifespan, stress response, and immunity. Notably, genes with genotype‐by‐temperature interactions on expression were not enriched on the proto‐sex chromosomes. Moreover, there was no evidence that temperature‐dependent expression is driven by chromosome‐widecis ‐regulatory divergence between the proto‐Y and proto‐X alleles. Therefore, if temperature‐dependent gene expression is responsible for differences in phenotypes and fitness of proto‐Y genotypes across house fly populations, these effects are driven by a small number of temperature‐dependent alleles on the proto‐Y chromosomes that may havetrans effects on the expression of genes on other chromosomes.