Search for: All records

This poster presents our first steps to define a roadmap to robust science for high-throughput applications used in scientific discovery. These applications combine multiple components into increasingly complex multi-modal workflows that are often executed in concert on heterogeneous systems. The increasing complexity hinders the ability of scientists to generate robust science (i.e., ensuring performance scalability in space and time; trust in technology, people, and infrastructures; and reproducible or confirmable research). Scientists must withstand and overcome adverse conditions such as heterogeneous and unreliable architectures at all scales (including extreme scale), rigorous testing under uncertainties, unexplainable algorithms in machine learning, and black-box methods. This poster presents findings and recommendations to build a roadmap to overcome these challenges and enable robust science. The data was collected from an international community of scientists during a virtual world cafe in February 2021 

Scientists using the high-throughput computing (HTC) paradigm for scientific discovery rely on complex software systems and heterogeneous architectures that must deliver robust science (i.e., ensuring performance scalability in space and time; trust in technology, people, and infrastructures; and reproducible or confirmable research). Developers must overcome a variety of obstacles to pursue workflow interoperability, identify tools and libraries for robust science, port codes across different architectures, and establish trust in non-deterministic results. This poster presents recommendations to build a roadmap to overcome these challenges and enable robust science for HTC applications and workflows. The findings were collected from an international community of software developers during a Virtual World Cafe in May 2021. 

The scientific computing community has long taken a leadership role in understanding and assessing the relationship of reproducibility to cyberinfrastructure, ensuring that computational results - such as those from simulations - are "reproducible", that is, the same results are obtained when one re-uses the same input data, methods, software and analysis conditions. Starting almost a decade ago, the community has regularly published and advocated for advances in this area. In this article we trace this thinking and relate it to current national efforts, including the 2019 National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine report on "Reproducibility and Replication in Science". To this end, this work considers high performance computing workflows that emphasize workflows combining traditional simulations (e.g. Molecular Dynamics simulations) with in situ analytics. We leverage an analysis of such workflows to (a) contextualize the 2019 National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine report's recommendations in the HPC setting and (b) envision a path forward in the tradition of community driven approaches to reproducibility and the acceleration of science and discovery. The work also articulates avenues for future research at the intersection of transparency, reproducibility, and computational infrastructure that supports scientific discovery.