Search for: All records

The polar and high latitude regions of the ionosphere are host to complex plasma processes involving Magnetosphere-Ionosphere (MI) coupling, plasma convection, and auroral dynamics. The magnetic field lines from the polar cusp down through the auroral region map out to the magnetosphere and project the footprint of the large-scale convective processes driven by the solar wind onto the ionosphere. This region is also a unique environment where the magnetic field is oriented nearly vertical, resulting in horizontal drifts along closed, localized, convection patterns, and where prolonged periods of darkness during the winter result in the absence of significant photoionization. This set of conditions results in unique ionospheric structures which can set the stage for the generation of the gradient drift instability (GDI). The GDI occurs when the density gradient and ExB plasma drift are in the same direction. The GDI is a source of structuring at density gradients and may give rise to ionospheric irregularities that impact over-the-horizon radars and GPS signals. While the plasma ExB drifts are supplied by magnetospheric convection and MI coupling, sharp density gradients in the polar regions will be present at polar holes. Since the GDI occurs where the density gradient and plasma drift are parallel, the ionospheric irregularities caused by the GDI should occur at the leading edge of the polar hole. If so, the resulting production of small-scale density irregularities may, if the density is high enough, give rise to scintillation of GNSS signals and backscatter on HF radars. In this study, we investigate whether these irregularities can occur at the edges of polar holes as detected by the HF radar scatter. We use the Ionospheric Data Assimilation 4-Dimentional (IDA4D) and Assimilative Mapping of Ionospheric Electrodynamics (AMIE) models to characterize the high latitude ionospheric density and ExB drift convective structures, respectively, for one of nine polar hole events identified using RISR-N incoherent scatter radar in Forsythe et al [2021]. The combined IDA4D and AMIE assimilative outputs indicate where the GDI could be triggered, e.g., locations where the density gradient and ExB drift velocity have parallel components and the growth rate is smaller than the characteristic time over which the convective pattern changes, in this case, ~1/15 min. The presence of decameter ionospheric plasma irregularities is detected using the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN). SuperDARN radars are HF coherent scatter radars. The presence of ionospheric radar returns in regions unstable to GDI grown strongly suggest the GDI is producing decameter scale plasma irregularities. The statistical analyses conducted in the above investigation do not show a clear pattern of enhanced scatter with larger computed GDI growth rates. Further investigation must be conducted before concluding that the GDI does not cause irregularities detectable with HF radar at polar holes. 

The plasmapause marks the limit of the plasmasphere and is characterized by a sudden change in plasma density. This can influence the other regions of the magnetosphere, including due to different waves circulating inside and outside the plasmasphere. In the present work, we first compare the positions of the plasmapause measured by the NASA Van Allen Probes in 2015 with those of the Space Weather Integrated Forecasting Framework plasmasphere model (SPM). Using the Van Allen Probes and other satellite observations like PROBA-V, we investigate the links that can exist with the radiation belt boundaries. The inward motion of the outer radiation belt associated with sudden flux enhancements of energetic electrons can indeed be directly related to the plasmapause erosion during geomagnetic storms, suggesting possible links. Moreover, the position of the plasmapause projected in the ionosphere is compared with the ionospheric convection boundary. The equatorward motion of the plasmapause projected in the ionosphere is related to the equatorward edge motion of the auroral oval that goes to lower latitudes during storms due to the geomagnetic perturbation, like the low altitude plasmapause and the outer radiation belt. The links between these different regions are investigated during quiet periods, for which the plasmasphere is widely extended, as well as during geomagnetic storms for which plumes are generated, and then afterwards rotates with the plasmasphere. The magnetic local time dependence of these boundaries is especially studied on March 14, 2014 after a sudden northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and for the geomagnetic storm of August 26, 2018, showing the importance of the magnetic field topology and of the convection electric field in the interactions between these different regions eventually leading to the coupling between magnetosphere and ionosphere. 

Abstract The Van Allen Probes Electric Fields and Waves (EFW) instrument provided measurements of electric fields and spacecraft floating potentials over a wide dynamic range from DC to 6.5 kHz near the equatorial plane of the inner magnetosphere between 600 km altitude and 5.8 Re geocentric distance from October 2012 to November 2019. The two identical instruments provided data to investigate the quasi-static and low frequency fields that drive large-scale convection, waves induced by interplanetary shock impacts that result in rapid relativistic particle energization, ultra-low frequency (ULF) MHD waves which can drive radial diffusion, and higher frequency wave fields and time domain structures that provide particle pitch angle scattering and energization. In addition, measurements of the spacecraft potential provided a density estimate in cold plasmas ( $$<20~\text{eV}$$ < 20 eV ) from 10 to $$3000~\text{cm}^{-3}$$ 3000 cm − 3 . The EFW instrument provided analog electric field signals to EMFISIS for wave analysis, and it received 3d analog signals from the EMFISIS search coil sensors for inclusion in high time resolution waveform data. The electric fields and potentials were measured by current-biased spherical sensors deployed at the end of four 50 m booms in the spacecraft spin plane (spin period $$\sim11~\text{sec}$$ ∼ 11 sec ) and a pair of stacer booms with a total tip-tip separation of 15 m along the spin axis. Survey waveform measurements at 16 and/or 32 S/sec (with a nominal uncertainty of 0.3 mV/m over the prime mission) were available continuously while burst waveform captures at up to 16,384 S/sec provided high frequency waveforms. This post-mission paper provides the reader with information useful for accessing, understanding and using EFW data. Selected science results are discussed and used to highlight instrument capabilities. Science quantities, data quality and error sources, and analysis routines are documented.