skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Upham‐Mills, Emily J"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract Autonomous recording units (ARUs) are recognized for their use in detecting vocalizing bird species to assess presence, occupancy, and density, but their potential to monitor reproductive status of individuals and reproductive rates is not well known. We investigated whether song rates derived from ARU data, when combined with the known date, can be used to predict the proportion of male songbirds in 3 breeding status classes (single, paired, and feeding young). We monitored breeding status with weekly field visits and collected daily ARU recordings at 46 olive‐sided flycatcher (Contopus cooperi) breeding territories in northwestern Canada in 2016–2017. We tested 4 variations of a hierarchical multinomial regression model that used time of day, day of year, and song rate derived from 2‐minute recordings to predict breeding status, and evaluated models using a novel, likelihood‐based approach. We found the top model correctly estimated 79% of the observed proportions of birds in each breeding status across the length of the breeding season. Although date was the primary predictor of breeding status, singing rate reduced some of the uncertainty and provided more accurate estimates for a given time. A major challenge to prediction accuracy and data interpretation was accounting for bird movement and the associated impact on detection, which we partly addressed by limiting our study to individuals who were detected on at least 30% of ARU sampling days. We demonstrate that ARUs can be used to assess breeding status in a cryptic, low‐density species at risk such as the olive‐sided flycatcher, suggesting this method could be applied to a wider range of species to better understand demographics and population dynamics, and inform management decisions, for bird species of concern. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available April 15, 2026