Search for: All records

We introduce and study spatiotemporal online allocation with deadline constraints (SOAD), a new online problem motivated by emerging challenges in sustainability and energy. In SOAD, an online player completes a workload by allocating and scheduling it on the points of a metric space (X,d) while subject to a deadlineT. At each time step, a service cost function is revealed that represents the cost of servicing the workload at each point, and the player must irrevocably decide the current allocation of work to points. Whenever the player moves this allocation, they incur a movement cost defined by the distance metricd(⋅, ⋅) that captures, e.g., an overhead cost. SOAD formalizes the open problem of combining general metrics and deadline constraints in the online algorithms literature, unifying problems such as metrical task systems and online search. We propose a competitive algorithm for SOAD along with a matching lower bound establishing its optimality. Our main algorithm, ST-CLIP, is a learning-augmented algorithm that takes advantage of predictions (e.g., forecasts of relevant costs) and achieves an optimal consistency-robustness trade-off. We evaluate our proposed algorithms in a simulated case study of carbon-aware spatiotemporal workload management, an application in sustainable computing that schedules a delay-tolerant batch compute job on a distributed network of data centers. In these experiments, we show that ST-CLIP substantially improves on heuristic baseline methods. 

To address the challenges of sim-to-real gap and sample efficiency in reinforcement learning (RL), this work studies distributionally robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs) --- optimize the worst-case performance when the deployed environment is within an uncertainty set around some nominal MDP. Despite recent efforts, the sample complexity of RMDPs has remained largely undetermined. While the statistical implications of distributional robustness in RL have been explored in some specific cases, the generalizability of the existing findings remains unclear, especially in comparison to standard RL. Assuming access to a generative model that samples from the nominal MDP, we examine the sample complexity of RMDPs using a class of generalized norms as the 'distance' function for the uncertainty set, under two commonly adopted -rectangular and -rectangular conditions. Our results imply that RMDPs can be more sample-efficient to solve than standard MDPs using generalized norms in both - and -rectangular cases, potentially inspiring more empirical research. We provide a near-optimal upper bound and a matching minimax lower bound for the -rectangular scenarios. For -rectangular cases, we improve the state-of-the-art upper bound and also derive a lower bound using norm that verifies the tightness. 

The robust 𝜙-regularized Markov Decision Process (RRMDP) framework focuses on designing control policies that are robust against parameter uncertainties due to mismatches between the simulator (nominal) model and real-world settings. This work makes two important contributions. First, we propose a model-free algorithm called Robust 𝜙-regularized fitted Q-iteration for learning an 𝜖-optimal robust policy that uses only the historical data collected by rolling out a behavior policy (with robust exploratory requirement) on the nominal model. To the best of our knowledge, we provide the first unified analysis for a class of 𝜙-divergences achieving robust optimal policies in high-dimensional systems of arbitrary large state space with general function approximation. Second, we introduce the hybrid robust 𝜙-regularized reinforcement learning framework to learn an optimal robust policy using both historical data and online sampling. Towards this framework, we propose a model-free algorithm called Hybrid robust Total-variation-regularized Q-iteration. To the best of our knowledge, we provide the first improved out-of-data-distribution assumption in large-scale problems of arbitrary large state space with general function approximation under the hybrid robust 𝜙-regularized reinforcement learning framework. 

We study the smoothed online quadratic optimization (SOQO) problem where, at each round t, a player plays an action xt in response to a quadratic hitting cost and an additional squared ℓ2-norm cost for switching actions. This problem class has strong connections to a wide range of application domains including smart grid management, adaptive control, and data center management, where switching-efficient algorithms are highly sought after. We study the SOQO problem in both adversarial and stochastic settings, and in this process, perform the first stochastic analysis of this class of problems. We provide the online optimal algorithm when the minimizers of the hitting cost function evolve as a general stochastic process, which, for the case of martingale process, takes the form of a distribution-agnostic dynamic interpolation algorithm that we call Lazy Adaptive Interpolation (LAI). Next, we present the stochastic-adversarial trade-off by proving an Ω(T) expected regret for the adversarial optimal algorithm in the literature (ROBD) with respect to LAI and, a sub-optimal competitive ratio for LAI in the adversarial setting. Finally, we present a best-of-both-worlds algorithm that obtains a robust adversarial performance while simultaneously achieving a near-optimal stochastic performance. 

To overcome the sim-to-real gap in reinforcement learning (RL), learned policies must maintain robustness against environmental uncertainties. While robust RL has been widely studied in single-agent regimes, in multi-agent environments, the problem remains understudied-- despite the fact that the problems posed by environmental uncertainties are often exacerbated by strategic interactions. This work focuses on learning in distributionally robust Markov games (RMGs), a robust variant of standard Markov games, wherein each agent aims to learn a policy that maximizes its own worst-case performance when the deployed environment deviates within its own prescribed uncertainty set. This results in a set of robust equilibrium strategies for all agents that align with classic notions of game-theoretic equilibria. Assuming a non-adaptive sampling mechanism from a generative model, we propose a sample-efficient model-based algorithm (DRNVI) with finite-sample complexity guarantees for learning robust variants of various notions of game-theoretic equilibria. We also establish an information-theoretic lower bound for solving RMGs, which confirms the near-optimal sample complexity of DR-NVI with respect to problem-dependent factors such as the size of the state space, the target accuracy, and the horizon length.