Search for: All records

With higher and faster growing wages [1], STEM-related employment has been key to building thriving communities. In the deindustrialized Midwest, however, cities often have poverty rates double the national average, lower educational attainment, and the ‘brain drain’ problem [2]. These issues create barriers to developing and retaining a regional STEM workforce and competing in the knowledge economy. Thus, STEM engagement is not just a national imperative, but critical to revitalizing these Midwestern cities. The University of Notre Dame developed and piloted a program to address the challenges of STEM engagement/retention in the disciplines and place retention. The program leveraged high impact practices such as immersive place-based education (internships), academic community engagement, and STEM-based experiential problem-based learning, while interns engaged in asset-based community development in the South Bend-Elkhart, Indiana region [3-14]. The pilot program was distilled into a model through evidence-based refinement – the Community- Engaged Educational Ecosystem Model (C-EEEM, pronounced ‘seam’), and contributes to our understanding of building learning environments that meet those challenges [4-6, 15-18]. 

This study investigates the relationship between urban walkability and human stress across three distinct sites, utilizing data collected from wearable sensors. The objective is to assess how urban design and environmental factors influence human stress while walking. Participants were equipped with wearable sensors to monitor physiological indicators of stress (e.g., heart rate variability, etc.) as they walked through different urban environments. Data was collected in realtime to capture fluctuations in stress levels and provide insights into how specific urban design features impact pedestrian well-being. To facilitate data collection and analysis, walking areas were divided into blocks, and urban design features were grouped into six categories such as imageability, enclosure, human scale, transparency, complexity, and safety. Each city has different features, depending on the issues that were considered most pressing for that city. To supplement sensor stress data, the study also utilized surveys to gather participants’ perceptions of safety, comfort, and environmental quality. Using regression analysis, researchers identified the urban design categories that have a significant impact on stress scores and their frequency. Machine learning models were built to predict stress scores based on the urban design aspects and air quality data as input features. Results showed that increased stress is correlated with poorly designed walkways, while lower stress was linked to well-maintained paths and green spaces. Transparency and enclosure were identified as significant contributors to pedestrian stress. The findings from one of the three cities add another dimension to the understanding of walkability and stress, highlighting that there are factors beyond basic infrastructure, such as noise levels and tree canopy can play a significant role in influencing pedestrian well-being. Findings from this research can facilitate targeted infrastructure planning and investment, better mobility, and ultimately improve the quality of life in urban areas. Future research should consider a wider range of environmental and social factors and how different factors interact over time to influence stress levels. 

With the ongoing transition to the knowledge-based, mobile economy, cities in the United States recognize the importance of a STEM-literate workforce. In the depopulated, legacy industrial areas in the Midwest, cities fight to attract and retain an educated workforce – particularly workers with STEM skills. STEM-related jobs, which generally have higher wages and growth are important to stabilizing and rebuilding their communities in the Digital Age. Yet, these areas also tend to have higher percentages of those underrepresented in STEM, including low socio-economic status (LSES) and underrepresented minorities (URM). Engagement and retention in STEM disciplines is of national importance, but for these regions it is critical to competing in the knowledge economy and revitalizing these cities. The Center for Civic Innovation at the University of Notre Dame (UND) piloted a program leveraging what we know about STEM engagement, project-based learning (PBL), academic community engagement, and asset-based community development with federal support (NSF IUSE Exploration and Design Tier for Engaged Student Learning & Institution and Community Transformation). Through examination and refinement, researchers developed the Community-Engaged Educational Ecosystem Model (C-EEEM, pronounced ‘seam’). The C-EEEM pilot contributed to our understanding of how to build learning environments that support 1) improvements in student motivation and retention in STEM; 2) changes in place attachment for participants; and 3) community impacts from project implementation. Through support of an NSF IUSE Development and Implementation Tier grant, the C-EEEM is now in its second year for replication in two cities, Youngstown, Ohio and Louisville, Kentucky 

Researchers at UNIVERSITY developed, piloted, and examined a community-engaged STEM learning environment at a university in Indiana. This summer, the MODEL developed from this pilot was adapted and replicated at two other universities. Over 50 students (high school and college) participated in the three regions in the Midwest in a community-engaged internship experience during the summer of 2022. Students worked on project teams of 4-6 students on a community-identified project for 8 weeks. Local high school teachers managed projects and community partners served as technical mentors as students completed their paid internship, which culminated with a formal presentation and product to their community partner. The larger research effort uses mixed-methods data collection, including surveys and interviews, to examine a variety of outcomes, including dispositional changes in STEM self-efficacy and identity. Students completed surveys and reflections at multiple points throughout their internship, including a retrospective pre/post survey capturing dispositional shifts during the experience The results of the internship experience on student intern participants' educational and professional plans at the 3 sites are evaluated in this paper. Results show significant gains on items related to professional discernment (desire to work in a STEM field, use technical skills, on open-ended problems for the betterment of society) for participants at all sites. 

Community-based research (CBR) is a practice that engages researchers in collaborative, change-oriented, and inclusive projects in the community. One common example of CBR is university-community collaboration in which students and researchers come up with ideas, perspectives, and knowledge at each stage of the project with the goal to address community needs. The community is mainly involved in identifying the research questions for the projects and making decisions about how the results of the research-focused projects will be implemented. This paper presents a replication of a model focused on university-community collaboration, student engagement and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) attraction and retention using three research-focused projects addressing community needs. The three projects are (1) empathic design project aimed at improving quality greenspaces and pedestrian streetscape experience, (2) food justice project to study the disparities in food access between local regions, and (3) analyzing water quality in a local creek. The projects provided a unique opportunity for students to directly experience and contribute to the research process. In addition, students worked closely with their academic peers and community partners who served as collaborators and mentors. The study reports on the impact of the program on student learning and tendency to stay back in the community. The program's collaborative nature and its effect on students' satisfaction while working on specific projects are also examined. Furthermore, the program helped develop and sustain university-community partnerships. The community stakeholders participating in focus groups were satisfied with the process of identifying community projects and also expressed their satisfaction with the students’ work. 

Community-based research (CBR) is a practice that engages researchers in collaborative, change-oriented, and inclusive projects in the community. One common example of CBR is university-community collaboration in which students and researchers come up with ideas, perspectives, and knowledge at each stage of the project with the goal to address community needs. The community is mainly involved in identifying the research questions for the projects and making decisions about how the results of the research-focused projects will be implemented. This paper presents a replication of a model focused on university-community collaboration, student engagement and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) attraction and retention using three research-focused projects addressing community needs. The three projects are (1) empathic design project aimed at improving quality greenspaces and pedestrian streetscape experience, (2) food justice project to study the disparities in food access between local regions, and (3) analyzing water quality in a local creek. The projects provided a unique opportunity for students to directly experience and contribute to the research process. In addition, students worked closely with their academic peers and community partners who served as collaborators and mentors. The study reports on the impact of the program on student learning and tendency to stay back in the community. The program's collaborative nature and its effect on students' satisfaction while working on specific projects are also examined. Furthermore, the program helped develop and sustain university-community partnerships. The community stakeholders participating in focus groups were satisfied with the process of identifying community projects and also expressed their satisfaction with the students’ work.