Search for: All records

III–V‐based multijunction solar cells have become the leading power generation technology for space applications due to their high power conversion efficiency and reliable performance in extraterrestrial environments. Thinning down the absorber layers of multijunction solar cells can considerably reduce the production cost and improve their radiation hardness. Recent advances in ultrathin GaAs single‐junction solar cells suggest the development of light‐trapping nanostructures to increase light absorption in optically thin layers within III–V‐based multijunction solar cells. Herein, a novel and highly scalable nanosphere lithography‐assisted chemical etching method to fabricate light‐trapping nanostructures in InGaP/GaAs dual‐junction solar cells is studied. Numerical models show that integrating the nanostructured Al₂O₃/Ag rear mirror significantly enhances the broadband absorption within the GaAs bottom cell. Results demonstrate that the light‐trapping nanostructures effectively increase the short‐circuit current density in GaAs bottom cells from 14.04 to 15.06 mA cm⁻². The simulated nanostructured InGaP/GaAs dual‐junction structure shows improved current matching between the GaAs bottom cell and the InGaP top cell, resulting in 1.12x higher power conversion efficiency. These findings highlight the potential of light‐trapping nanostructures to improve the performance of III‐V‐based multijunction photovoltaic systems, particularly for high‐efficiency applications in space. 

Transfer learning leverages feature representations of deep neural networks (DNNs) pretrained on source tasks with rich data to empower effective finetuning on downstream tasks. However, the pre-trained models are often prohibitively large for delivering generalizable representations, which limits their deployment on edge devices with constrained resources. To close this gap, we propose a new transfer learning pipeline, which leverages our finding that robust tickets can transfer better, i.e., subnetworks drawn with properly induced adversarial robustness can win better transferability over vanilla lottery ticket subnetworks. Extensive experiments and ablation studies validate that our proposed transfer learning pipeline can achieve enhanced accuracy-sparsity trade-offs across both diverse downstream tasks and sparsity patterns, further enriching the lottery ticket hypothesis. 

Vision transformers (ViTs) have recently set off a new wave in neural architecture design thanks to their record-breaking performance in various vision tasks. In parallel, to fulfill the goal of deploying ViTs into real-world vision applications, their robustness against potential malicious attacks has gained increasing attention. In particular, recent works show that ViTs are more robust against adversarial attacks as compared with convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and conjecture that this is because ViTs focus more on capturing global interactions among different input/feature patches, leading to their improved robustness to local perturbations imposed by adversarial attacks. In this work, we ask an intriguing question: “Under what kinds of perturbations do ViTs become more vulnerable learners compared to CNNs?” Driven by this question, we first conduct a comprehensive experiment regarding the robustness of both ViTs and CNNs under various existing adversarial attacks to understand the underlying reason favoring their robustness. Based on the drawn insights, we then propose a dedicated attack framework, dubbed Patch-Fool, that fools the self-attention mechanism by attacking its basic component (i.e., a single patch) with a series of attention-aware optimization techniques. Interestingly, our Patch-Fool framework shows for the first time that ViTs are not necessarily more robust than CNNs against adversarial perturbations. In particular, we find that ViTs are more vulnerable learners compared with CNNs against our Patch-Fool attack which is consistent across extensive experiments, and the observations from Sparse/Mild Patch-Fool, two variants of Patch-Fool, indicate an intriguing insight that the perturbation density and strength on each patch seem to be the key factors that influence the robustness ranking between ViTs and CNNs. It can be expected that our Patch-Fool framework will shed light on both future architecture designs and training schemes for robustifying ViTs towards their real-world deployment. Our codes are available at https://github.com/RICE-EIC/Patch-Fool. 

Low precision deep neural network (DNN) training is one of the most effective techniques for boosting DNNs’ training efficiency, as it trims down the training cost from the finest bit level. While existing works mostly fix the model precision during the whole training process, a few pioneering works have shown that dynamic precision schedules help NNs converge to a better accuracy while leading to a lower training cost than their static precision training counterparts. However, existing dynamic low precision training methods rely on manually designed precision schedules to achieve advantageous efficiency and accuracy trade-offs, limiting their more comprehensive practical applications and achievable performance. To this end, we propose LDP, a Learnable Dynamic Precision DNN training framework that can automatically learn a temporally and spatially dynamic precision schedule during training towards optimal accuracy and efficiency trade-offs. It is worth noting that LDP-trained DNNs are by nature efficient during inference. Further more, we visualize the resulting temporal and spatial precision schedule and distribution of LDP trained DNNs on different tasks to better understand the corresponding DNNs’ characteristics at different training stages and DNN layers both during and after training, drawing insights for promoting further innovations. Extensive experiments and ablation studies (seven networks, five datasets, and three tasks) show that the proposed LDP consistently outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) low precision DNN training techniques in terms of training efficiency and achieved accuracy trade-offs. For example, in addition to having the advantage of being automated, our LDP achieves a 0.31% higher accuracy with a 39.1% lower computational cost when training ResNet-20 on CIFAR-10 as compared with the best SOTA method. 

This paper investigates the asymptotic behaviors of gradient descent algorithms (particularly accelerated gradient descent and stochastic gradient descent) in the context of stochastic optimization arising in statistics and machine learning, where objective functions are estimated from available data. We show that these algorithms can be computationally modeled by continuous-time ordinary or stochastic differential equations. We establish gradient flow central limit theorems to describe the limiting dynamic behaviors of these computational algorithms and the large-sample performances of the related statistical procedures, as the number of algorithm iterations and data size both go to infinity, where the gradient flow central limit theorems are governed by some linear ordinary or stochastic differential equations, like time-dependent Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes. We illustrate that our study can provide a novel unified framework for a joint computational and statistical asymptotic analysis, where the computational asymptotic analysis studies the dynamic behaviors of these algorithms with time (or the number of iterations in the algorithms), the statistical asymptotic analysis investigates the large-sample behaviors of the statistical procedures (like estimators and classifiers) that are computed by applying the algorithms; in fact, the statistical procedures are equal to the limits of the random sequences generated from these iterative algorithms, as the number of iterations goes to infinity. The joint analysis results based on the obtained gradient flow central limit theorems lead to the identification of four factors—learning rate, batch size, gradient covariance, and Hessian—to derive new theories regarding the local minima found by stochastic gradient descent for solving non-convex optimization problems.