Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
more » « less
Abstract Millions of dams impair watershed connectivity across the globe and have severely affected migratory fish populations. Fishways offer upstream passage opportunities, but artificial selection may be imposed by these structures. Using juvenile American eel
Anguilla rostrata as a model species, we consider whether individual differences in behaviour (i.e. personality) and fish size can predict passage success.We evaluated the expression of bold and exploratory behaviours using open field and emergence assays in the laboratory. Then we assessed the propensity for individuals to volitionally climb through an experimental fishway to understand if personality and fish size could predict climbing success.
We demonstrate personality in juvenile eels, and swimming speed in the open field was negatively associated with climbing propensity. Slower swimmers were up to 60% more likely to use the passage device suggesting that more exploratory eels incurred greater passage success. For successful climbers, climbing time was negatively associated with fish length.
Synthesis and applications . Our results suggest fish may segregate at barriers based on personality and size. Preventing a subset of individuals from accessing upstream habitat is likely to have negative consequences for fish populations and aquatic ecosystems. Selection may be alleviated by increasing passage opportunities, maximizing fishway attraction and avoiding inefficient passage solutions. -
more » « less
Aging infrastructure and growing interests in river restoration have led to a substantial rise in dam removals in the United States. However, the decision to remove a dam involves many complex trade-offs. The benefits of dam removal for hazard reduction and ecological restoration are potentially offset by the loss of hydroelectricity production, water supply, and other important services. We use a multiobjective approach to examine a wide array of trade-offs and synergies involved with strategic dam removal at three spatial scales in New England. We find that increasing the scale of decision-making improves the efficiency of trade-offs among ecosystem services, river safety, and economic costs resulting from dam removal, but this may lead to heterogeneous and less equitable local-scale outcomes. Our model may help facilitate multilateral funding, policy, and stakeholder agreements by analyzing the trade-offs of coordinated dam decisions, including net benefit alternatives to dam removal, at scales that satisfy these agreements.
