Search for: All records

In many lentic ecosystems, hydroperiod, or the duration of inundation, controls animal community composition and biomass. Although hydroperiod-imposed differences in wetland animal communities could cause differences in animal-driven nutrient supply, hydroperiod has not been considered as a template for investigating patterns of animal-driven nutrient cycling. Here, we use nutrient excretion rates (NH4-N and SRP) and biomasses of pelagic and benthic invertebrates and salamanders and nutrient uptake rates in a simulation model to estimate animal-driven nutrient supply and pond-level demand along a hydroperiod gradient of 12 subalpine ponds in the U.S. Rocky Mountains that are vulnerable to climate change. We found that animal biomass increased with hydroperiod duration and biomass predicted animal-driven supply contributions among hydroperiod classifications (temporary-permanent). Consequently, community-wide supply was greatest in permanent ponds. Animal-driven N supply exceeded demand in permanent and semi-permanent ponds, whereas P supply equaled demand in both. Conversely, temporary ponds had large deficits in N and P supply due to lower community biomass and hydroperiod-induced constraints on dominant suppliers (oligochaetes and chironomids). The distribution of taxon-specific supply also differed among hydroperiods, with supply dominated by a few taxa in permanent ponds and supply more evenly distributed among temporary pond taxa. The absence or lower biomass of dominant suppliers in temporary ponds creates nutrient deficits and possible limitation of productivity. Thus, as climate warming causes hydroperiods to become increasingly temporary and indirectly prompts biomass declines and compositional shifts, animal-driven nutrient supply will decrease and strong nutrient limitation may arise due to loss of animal-driven supply. 

Small ponds account for a disproportionately high percentage of carbon dioxide emissions relative to their small surface area. It is therefore crucial to understand carbon flow in these ponds to refine the current global carbon budget, especially because climate change is affecting pond hydrology. High elevation ponds in the Elk Mountains of western Colorado are drying more frequently as the timing of snowmelt advances. We compared CO2 concentrations and fluxes among ponds of different hydroperiods over diel sampling periods during the course of the 2017 open-water period. CO2 concentrations were significantly negatively correlated with pond depth and averaged 77.6 ± 24.5 μmol L−1 (mean ± S.E.) across all ponds and sampling events. Ponds were up to twenty times supersaturated in CO2 with respect to the atmosphere. Flux was highly variable within individual ponds but correlated with time of sampling and was highest at night. Flux averaged 19.7 ± 18.8 mg CO2 m−2 h−1 across all ponds and sampling events. We also compared flux values obtained using modeled and empirical methods and found that widely-applied models of gas exchange rates using wind-based gas exchange (K) values yielded estimates of CO2 flux that were significantly higher than those obtained using the floating chamber approach, but estimates of CO2 flux using globally averaged convection-based K values were lower than those obtained using the floating chambers. Lastly, we integrated soil vs. water efflux measurements with long-term patterns in hydrology to predict how total season-long efflux might change under the more rapid drying regimes and longer seasons that are already occurring in these systems. Because soil CO2 efflux averaged 277.0 ± 49.0 mg CO2 m−2 h−1, temporary ponds emitted 674.1 ± 99.4 kg CO2 m−2 over the course of the 2017 season from ice-out to refreezing, which was over twice as much as permanent and semi-permanent ponds. Our results emphasize that contributions of CO2 from small ponds to the global carbon budget estimates will vary with pond hydroperiod and sampling methodology, which have been overlooked given that most previous estimates were collected from limited sampling periods and from pond waters alone. Furthermore, pond CO2 contributions are predicted to increase over time as pond areas transition from efflux from water to efflux from soil.