Search for: All records

We derive a perturbation solution to the one-dimensional Poisson–Nernst–Planck (PNP) equations between parallel electrodes under oscillatory polarization for arbitrary ionic mobilities and valences. Treating the applied potential as the perturbation parameter, we show that the second-order solution yields a nonzero time-average electric field at large distances from the electrodes, corroborating the recent discovery of Asymmetric Rectified Electric Fields (AREFs) via numerical solution to the full nonlinear PNP equations [Hashemi Amrei et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. , 2018, 121 , 185504]. Importantly, the first-order solution is analytic, while the second-order AREF is semi-analytic and obtained by numerically solving a single linear ordinary differential equation, obviating the need for full numerical solutions to the PNP equations. We demonstrate that at sufficiently high frequencies and electrode spacings the semi-analytical AREF accurately captures both the complicated shape and the magnitude of the AREF, even at large applied potentials. 

Inspired by the forward swimming of long-tailed crustaceans, we study an underwater propulsion mechanism for a swimming body with multiple rigid paddles attached underneath undergoing cycles of power and return strokes with a constant phase-difference between neighboring paddles, a phenomenon known as metachronal propulsion. To study how inter-paddle phase-difference affects flux production, we develop a computational fluid dynamics model and a numerical algorithm based on the immersed boundary method, which allows us to simulate metachronal propulsion at Reynolds numbers (RE) ranging from close to 0 to about 100. Our main finding is that the highest average flux is generated when nearest-neighbor paddles maintain an approximate 20%–25% phase-difference with the more posterior paddle leading the cycle; this result is independent of stroke frequency across the full range of RE considered here. We also find that the optimal paddle spacing and the number of paddles depend on RE; we see a qualitative transition in the dynamics of flow generated by metachronal propulsion as RE rises above 80. Roughly speaking, in terms of average flux generation, a tight paddle spacing is preferred when RE is less than 10, but a wider spacing becomes clearly favored when RE is close to or above 100. In terms of efficiency of flux generation, at RE 0.1 the maximum efficiency occurs at two paddles, and the efficiency decreases as the number of paddles increases. At RE 100 the efficiency increases as the number of paddles increases, and it appears to saturate by eight paddles, whereas using four paddles is a good tradeoff for both low and intermediate RE.