skip to main content


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 1708542

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. null (Ed.)
  2. null (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT We apply the cooperative free volume (CFV) rate model for pressure-dependent dynamics of glass-forming liquids and polymer melts, focusing on two new applications of the model, to natural rubber and to polyurea. In CFV, segmental relaxation times, τ, are analyzed as a function of temperature (T) and free volume (Vfree), where the latter provides an insightful route to expressing dynamics relative to using the system's overall total volume (V). Vfree is defined as the difference between the total volume and the volume at close packing and is predicted independently of the dynamics for any temperature and pressure using the locally correlated lattice equation-of-state analysis of characteristic thermodynamic data. The new results for natural rubber and polyurea are discussed in the context of results on a set of polymeric and small-molecule glass formers that had previously been modeled with CFV. We also discuss the results in the context of recent connections that we have made with the density-scaling approach. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    Data continue to accrue indicating that experimental techniques may differ in their sensitivity to mobility and glassiness. In this work the Limited Mobility (LM) kinetic model is used to show that two metrics for tracking sample mobility yield quantitatively different results for the glass transition and mobile layer thickness in systems where free surfaces are present. Both LM metrics track the fraction of material that embodies mobile free volume; in one it is relative to that portion of the sample containing any kind (mobile and dormant) of free volume, and in the other it is relative to the overall sample. Without any kind of optimization, use of the latter metric leads to semi-quantitative agreement with experimental film results, both for the mobile layer thickness and the dependence of sample glass transition temperature on film thickness. Connecting the LM predictions with experiment also produces a semi-quantitative mapping between LM model length and temperature scales, and those of real systems. 
    more » « less