skip to main content


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 1710920

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. null (Ed.)
  2. null (Ed.)
  3. null (Ed.)
  4. null (Ed.)
  5. For decoding low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, the attenuated min-sum algorithm (AMSA) and the offset min-sum algorithm (OMSA) can outperform the conventional min-sum algorithm (MSA) at low signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs), i.e., in the “waterfall region” of the bit error rate curve. This paper demonstrates that, for quantized decoders, MSA actually outperforms AMSA and OMSA in the “error floor” region, and that all three algorithms suffer from a relatively high error floor. This motivates the introduction of a modified MSA that is designed to outperform MSA, AMSA, and OMSA across all SNRs. The new algorithm is based on the assumption that trapping sets are the major cause of the error floor for quantized LDPC decoders. A performance estimation tool based on trapping sets is used to verify the effectiveness of the new algorithm and also to guide parameter selection. We also show that the implementation complexity of the new algorithm is only slightly higher than that of AMSA or OMSA. Finally, the simulated performance of the new algorithm, using several classes of LDPC codes (including spatially coupled LDPC codes), is shown to outperform MSA, AMSA, and OMSA across all SNRs. 
    more » « less
  6. null (Ed.)
  7. null (Ed.)
  8. null (Ed.)
  9. null (Ed.)