Search for: All records

A recent work showed that it is possible to transform a single-cycle test for stuck-at faults into a launch-on-shift (LOS) test that is guaranteed to detect the same stuck-at faults without any logic or fault simulation. The LOS test also detects transition faults. This was used for obtaining a compact LOS test set that detects both types of faults. In the scenario where LOS tests are used for both stuck-at and transition faults, this article observes that, under certain conditions, the detection of a stuck-at fault guarantees the detection of a corresponding transition fault. This implies that the two faults are equivalent under LOS tests. Equivalence can be used for reducing the set of target faults for test generation and test compaction. The article develops this notion of equivalence under LOS tests with equal primary input vectors and provides an efficient procedure for identifying it. It presents experimental results to demonstrate that such equivalences exist in benchmark circuits, and shows an unexpected effect on a test compaction procedure. 

Functional broadside tests were developed to avoid overtesting of delay faults. The tests achieve this goal by creating functional operation conditions during their functional capture cycles. To increase the achievable fault coverage, close-to-functional scan-based tests are allowed to deviate from functional operation conditions. This article suggests that a more comprehensive functional broadside test set can be obtained by replacing target faults that cannot be detected with faults that have similar (but not identical) detection conditions. A more comprehensive functional broadside test set has the advantage that it still maintains functional operation conditions. It covers the test holes created when target faults cannot be detected by detecting similar faults. The article considers the case where the target faults are transition faults. When a standard transition fault, with an extra delay of a single clock cycle, cannot be detected, an unspecified transition fault is used instead. An unspecified transition fault captures the behaviors of transition faults with different extra delays. When this fault cannot be detected, a stuck-at fault is used instead. A stuck-at fault has some of the detection conditions of a transition fault. Multicycle functional broadside tests are used to allow unspecified transition faults to be detected. As a by-product, test compaction also occurs. The structure of the test generation procedure accommodates the complexity of producing functional broadside tests by considering the target as well as replacement faults together. Experimental results for benchmark circuits demonstrate the fault coverage improvements achieved, and the effect on the number of tests. 

The use of multicycle tests, with several functional capture cycles between scan operations, contributes significantly to the ability to compact a test set. Multicycle tests have the added benefit that they can contribute to the detection of defects with complex behaviors that are not detected by single-cycle or two-cycle tests. To ensure that this benefit is materialized when test compaction is applied to transition faults, this article suggests to incorporate into the test compaction procedure an additional fault model whose fault coverage increases when multicycle tests are used. To ensure that the computational complexity of test compaction is not increased by a fault model with a large number of faults, or faults with complex behaviors, the added fault model is required to have the same characteristics as the transition fault model. A type of transition fault called unspecified transition fault satisfies these requirements. The article describes a test compaction procedure for transition faults that incorporates unspecified transition faults, and presents experimental results for benchmark circuits to demonstrate the levels of test compaction and fault coverage that can be achieved.