Search for: All records

Storing data structures in high-capacity byte-addressable persistent memory instead of DRAM or a storage device offers the opportunity to (1) reduce cost and power consumption compared with DRAM, (2) decrease the latency and CPU resources needed for an I/O operation compared with storage, and (3) allow for fast recovery as the data structure remains in memory after a machine failure. The first commercial offering in this space is Intel® Optane™ Direct Connect (Optane™ DC) Persistent Memory. Optane™ DC promises access time within a constant factor of DRAM, with larger capacity, lower energy consumption, and persistence. We present an experimental evaluation of persistent transactional memory performance, and explore how Optane™ DC durability domains affect the overall results. Given that neither of the two available durability domains can deliver performance competitive with DRAM, we introduce and emulate a new durability domain, called PDRAM, in which the memory controller tracks enough information (and has enough reserve power) to make DRAM behave like a persistent cache of Optane™ DC memory.In this paper we compare the performance of these durability domains on several configurations of five persistent transactional memory applications. We find a large throughput difference, which emphasizes the importance of choosing the best durability domain for each application and system. At the same time, our results confirm that recently published persistent transactional memory algorithms are able to scale, and that recent optimizations for these algorithms lead to strong performance, with speedups as high as 6× at 16 threads. 

Byte-addressable, non-volatile, random access memory (NVM) has the potential to dramatically accelerate the performance of storage-intensive workloads. For applications with irregular data access patterns, and applications that rely on ad-hoc data structures, the most promising model for interacting with NVM is a transactional model. However, the specifics of the model matter significantly. We introduce two models for programming persistent transactions. We show how to build concurrent persistent transactional memory from traditional software transactional memories. We then introduce general and model-specific optimizations that can substantially improve the performance of persistent transactions. Our evaluation shows a substantial improvement in the both the latency and scalability of persistent transactions.