Search for: All records

Abstract Networks of direct and indirect biotic interactions underpin the complex dynamics and stability of ecological systems, yet experimental and theoretical studies often yield conflicting evidence regarding the direction (positive or negative) or magnitude of these interactions. We revisited pioneering data sets collected at the deciduous forested Horonai Stream and conducted ecosystem‐level syntheses to demonstrate that the direction of direct and indirect interactions can change depending on the timescale of observation. Prior experimental studies showed that terrestrial prey that enter the stream from the adjacent forest caused positive indirect effects on aquatic invertebrates during summer by diverting fish consumption. Seasonal and annual estimates of secondary production and organic matter flows along food web pathways demonstrate that this seasonal input of terrestrial invertebrate prey increases production of certain fish species, reversing the indirect effect on aquatic invertebrates from positive at the seasonal timescale to negative at the annual timescale. Even though terrestrial invertebrate prey contributed 54% of the annual organic matter flux to fishes, primarily during summer, fish still consumed 98% of the aquatic invertebrate annual production, leading to top‐down control that is not revealed in short‐term experiments and demonstrating that aquatic prey may be a limiting resource for fishes. Changes in the direction or magnitude of interactions may be a key factor creating nonlinear or stabilizing feedbacks in complex systems, and these dynamics can be revealed by merging experimental and comparative approaches at different scales. 

Abstract Large carnivores were persecuted in Yellowstone National Park, WY, USA, during the late 1800s and early 1900s, leading to extirpation of grey wolves (Canis lupus) and cougars (Puma concolor). Soon thereafter increased herbivory of riparian plant communities by Rocky Mountain Elk (Cervus elaphus) became widespread in the park's northern ungulate winter range or “northern range.” Wolves were reintroduced in 1995–1996, again completing the park's large carnivore guild. In 2004 and 2017, we sampled Geyer willow (Salix geyeriana), a commonly occurring tall willow, along the West and East Forks of Blacktail Deer Creek in the central portion of the northern range. Results indicated high levels of elk herbivory in the 1990s, as in previous decades, not only continued to keep willows short, generally ≤52 cm in height, but also resulted in stream widening and incision, leading to “oversized” channel cross‐sections and a drastically reduced frequency of overbank flows. However, by 2017, willow heights ≥200 cm ( = 310 cm) were prevalent, and canopy cover over the stream, essentially absent in 1995, had increased to 43% and 93% along the West Fork and East Fork, respectively. These recent increases in tall willow heights, greater canopy cover, well‐vegetated streambanks, and the recent development of an inset floodplain all pointed towards a riparian/aquatic ecosystem beginning to recover. Overall, results were consistent with a landscape‐scale trophic cascade, whereby reintroduced wolves, operating in concert with other large carnivores, appear to have sufficiently reduced elk herbivory in riparian areas to initiate the recovery of Blacktail Deer Creek's riparian plant communities and stream channels. 

Abstract Habitat enhancements seek to ameliorate the detrimental effects of environmental degradation and take many forms, but usually entail structural (e.g. logs, cribs, reefs) or biogenic (e.g. carrion additions, vegetation plantings, fish stocking) augmentations with the intent of increasing fish annual production (i.e. accrual of new fish biomass through time). Whether efforts increase fish production or simply attract fish has long been subject to debate.Streams of the Pacific Northwest are commonly targeted for habitat enhancements to mitigate for the detrimental effects of dams and other forms of habitat degradation on Pacific salmon. Nutrient mitigation (i.e. the practice of artificially fertilising freshwaters) is a form of biogenic habitat enhancement that attempts to mimic the enrichment effects of a natural Pacific salmon spawning event. This approach assumes nutrient augmentations alleviate nutrient limitation of primary producers and/or food limitation of primary and secondary consumers, culminating in increased fish production.We conducted a multi‐year manipulative experiment and tracked responses of interior rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to annual additions of Pacific salmon carcasses as part of an effort to enhance the productivity of salmonid populations in streams where salmon runs have been lost. We employed an integrated approach to partition the mechanisms driving numerical responses of trout populations across timescales, to assess population turnover, and to track responses to habitat enhancements across individual to population level metrics.Short‐term numerical increases by trout were shaped by immigration and subsequently via retention of individuals within treatment reaches. As trout moved into treated stream reaches, individuals foraged, grew, and subsequently moved to other locations such that short‐term increases in fish numbers did not persist from year to year. All told, additions of salmon carcasses alleviated apparent food limitation and thereby increased secondary production of rainbow trout. However, at an annual time scale, increased production manifested as larger individual fish, not more fish within treated reaches. Fish movements and high population turnover within treated stream reaches apparently led to the subsequent dispersal of increased fish production.We found multiple lines of evidence that indicated that annual additions of salmon carcasses aggregated rainbow trout and enhanced their annual production. Through this replicated management experiment, we documented dynamic individual and population level responses to a form of stream habitat manipulation across weekly and annual timescales. 

Abstract. All organisms are ultimately dependent on a large diversity of consumptiveand non-consumptive interactions established with other organisms, formingan intricate web of interdependencies. In 1992, when 1700 concernedscientists issued the first “World Scientists' Warning to Humanity”, ourunderstanding of such interaction networks was still in its infancy. Bysimultaneously considering the species (nodes) and the links that glue themtogether into functional communities, the study of modern food webs – ormore generally ecological networks – has brought us closer to a predictivecommunity ecology. Scientists have now observed, manipulated, and modelledthe assembly and the collapse of food webs under various global changestressors and identified common patterns. Most stressors, such as increasingtemperature, biological invasions, biodiversity loss, habitat fragmentation,over-exploitation, have been shown to simplify food webs byconcentrating energy flow along fewer pathways, threatening long-termcommunity persistence. More worryingly, it has been shown that communitiescan abruptly change from highly diverse to simplified stable states withlittle or no warning. Altogether, evidence shows that apart from thechallenge of tackling climate change and hampering the extinction ofthreatened species, we need urgent action to tackle large-scale biologicalchange and specifically to protect food webs, as we are under the risk of pushingentire ecosystems outside their safe zones. At the same time, we need togain a better understanding of the global-scale synergies and trade-offsbetween climate change and biological change. Here we highlight the mostpressing challenges for the conservation of natural food webs and recentadvances that might help us addressing such challenges.