Search for: All records

Abstract Physiological closed-loop control algorithms play an important role in the development of autonomous medical care systems, a promising area of research that has the potential to deliver healthcare therapies meeting each patient's specific needs. Computational approaches can support the evaluation of physiological closed-loop control algorithms considering various sources of patient variability that they may be presented with. In this article, we present a generative approach to testing the performance of physiological closed-loop control algorithms. This approach exploits a generative physiological model (which consists of stochastic and dynamic components that represent diverse physiological behaviors across a patient population) to generate a select group of virtual subjects. By testing a physiological closed-loop control algorithm against this select group, the approach estimates the distribution of relevant performance metrics in the represented population. We illustrate the promise of this approach by applying it to a practical case study on testing a closed-loop fluid resuscitation control algorithm designed for hemodynamic management. In this context, we show that the proposed approach can test the algorithm against virtual subjects equipped with a wide range of plausible physiological characteristics and behavior and that the test results can be used to estimate the distribution of relevant performance metrics in the represented population. In sum, the generative testing approach may offer a practical, efficient solution for conducting preclinical tests on physiological closed-loop control algorithms. 

Abstract This paper concerns the design and rigorous in silico evaluation of a closed-loop hemorrhage resuscitation algorithm with blood pressure (BP) as controlled variable. A lumped-parameter control design model relating volume resuscitation input to blood volume (BV) and BP responses was developed and experimentally validated. Then, three alternative adaptive control algorithms were developed using the control design model: (i) model reference adaptive control (MRAC) with BP feedback, (ii) composite adaptive control (CAC) with BP feedback, and (iii) CAC with BV and BP feedback. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to demonstrate model-based control design for hemorrhage resuscitation with readily available BP as feedback. The efficacy of these closed-loop control algorithms was comparatively evaluated as well as compared with an empiric expert knowledge-based algorithm based on 100 realistic virtual patients created using a well-established physiological model of cardiovascular (CV) hemodynamics. The in silico evaluation results suggested that the adaptive control algorithms outperformed the knowledge-based algorithm in terms of both accuracy and robustness in BP set point tracking: the average median performance error (MDPE) and median absolute performance error (MDAPE) were significantly smaller by >99% and >91%, and as well, their interindividual variability was significantly smaller by >88% and >94%. Pending in vivo evaluation, model-based control design may advance the medical autonomy in closed-loop hemorrhage resuscitation.