Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract The riverine transport and deposition of mud is the primary agent of landscape construction and evolution in many fluvial and coastal environments. Previous efforts exploring this process have raised uncertainty regarding the effects of hydrodynamic and chemical controls on the transport and deposition of mud, and thus the constructions of muddy coastal and upstream environments. As such, direct measurements are necessary to constrain the deposition of mud by river systems. Here, we combine laboratory evidence and a field investigation in the Mississippi River delta to explore the controls on the riverine transport and deposition of mud. We show that the flocculation of mud, with floc diameters greater than 10 μm, in freshwater is a ubiquitous phenomenon, causing the sedimentation of mud to be driven by changes in local hydrodynamics, and thus providing an explanation for how river systems construct landscapes through the deposition of mud in both coastal and upstream environments.more » « less
-
Abstract Due to the flocculation process, suspended mud aggregates carried by rivers to the coastal ocean are thought to undergo changes in size and shape in response to environmental drivers such as turbulence, sediment concentration, organic matter (OM), and salinity. Some have assumed that salt is necessary for floc formation, and that mud, therefore, reaches the estuary unflocculated. Yet mud flocs exist in freshwater systems long before the estuarine zone, likely due to the presence of OM acting as a floc‐promoting binder. Therefore, it is important to consider how salinity affects flocculation, if at all, in the presence of OM. Here, we used experiments to examine the flocculation of a natural mud with and without OM. Results showed that the rate of floc growth and equilibrium size both increase with salinity regardless of the presence or absence of OM. However, the response of both to salinity was stronger when OM was present. In deionized water, natural sediment with OM was seen to produce large flocs. However, the size distribution of the suspension tended to be bimodal. With the addition of salt, increasing amounts of unflocculated material became bound within flocs, producing a more unimodal size distribution. Here, the enhancing effects of salt were noticeable at even 0.5 ppt, and increases in salinity past 3–5 ppt only marginally increased the floc growth rate and final size. Data from the experiment were used to develop a salinity‐dependent model to account for changes in floc growth rate and equilibrium size.more » « less
-
Abstract We use in situ measurements of suspended mud to assess the flocculation state of the lowermost freshwater reaches of the Mississippi River. The goal of the study was to assess the flocculation state of the mud in the absence of seawater, the spatial distribution of floc sizes within the river, and to look for seasonal differences between summer and winter. We also examine whether measured floc sizes can explain observed vertical distributions of mud concentration through a Rouse profile analysis. Data were collected at the same locations during summer and winter at similar discharges and suspended sediment concentrations. Measurements showed that the mud in both seasons was flocculated and that the floc size could reasonably be represented by a cross‐sectional averaged value as sizes varied little over the flow depth or laterally across the river at a given station. Depth‐averaged floc sizes ranged from 75 to 200 microns and increased slightly moving downriver as turbulence levels dropped. On average, flocs were 40 microns larger during summer than in winter, likely due to enhanced microbial activity associated with warmer water. Floc size appeared to explain vertical variations in mud concentration profiles when the bed was predominately composed of sand. Average mud settling velocities for these cases ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 mm/s. However, Rouse‐estimated settling velocities ranged from 1 to 3 mm/s at two stations during winter where the bed was composed of homogeneous mud. These values exceeded the size‐based estimates of settling velocity.more » « less
-
Muddy sediment constitutes a major fraction of the suspended sediment mass carried by the Mississippi River. Thus, adequate knowledge of the transport dynamics of suspended mud in this region is critical in devising efficient management plans for coastal Louisiana. We conducted laboratory tank experiments on the sediment suspended in the lower reaches of the Mississippi River to provide insight into the flocculation behavior of the mud. In particular, we measure how the floc size distribution responds to changing environmental factors of turbulent energy, sediment concentration, and changes in base water composition and salinity during summer and winter. We also compare observations from the tank experiments toin situobservations. Turbulence shear rate, a measure of river hydrodynamic energy, was found to be the most influential factor in determining mud floc size. All flocs produced at a given shear rate could be kept in suspension down to shear rates of approximately 20 s−1. At this shear rate, flocs on the order of 150–200 μm and larger can settle out. Equilibrium floc size was not found to depend on sediment concentration; flocs larger than 100 μm formed in sediment concentrations as low as 20 mgL−1. An increase in salinity generated by adding salts to river water suspensions did not increase the flocculation rate or equilibrium size. However, the addition of water collected from the Gulf of Mexico to river-water suspensions did enhance the flocculation rate and the equilibrium sizes. We speculate that the effects of Gulf of Mexico water originate from its biomatter content rather than its ion composition. Floc sizes in the mixing tanks were comparable to those from the field for similar estimated turbulent energy. Flocs were found to break within minutes under increased turbulence but can take hours to grow under conditions of reduced shear in freshwater settings. Growth was faster with the addition of Gulf of Mexico water. Overall, the experiments provide information on how suspended mud in the lower reaches of the Mississippi might respond to changes in turbulence and salinity moving from the fluvial to marine setting through natural distributary channels or man-made diversions.more » « less
-
Uijttewaal, W.; Franca, J.; Valero, M.; Chavarrias, D.; Ylla Arbós, V.; Schielen, C.; Crosato, A. (Ed.)Turbid rivers and density currents carry, distribute, and deposit considerable quantities of fine muddy sediment within rivers, coastal regions, and reservoirs. The muddy sediment in these flows has the potential to flocculate, and knowing and predicting the floc size is critical for predicting mud movement. Flocs are notoriously difficult to measure. Imaging of flocs either within a turbulent suspension or in a separate settling chamber are methods widely considered to be the most accurate ways to measure floc size. The benefit of imaging flocs within the suspension is that the measurements are made within the conditions that gave rise to those particular flocs. The drawback is that it is not possible to make measurements in suspensions with concentrations > 400 mg/L. Transferring a suspension sample to a settling chamber allows for imaging of flocs from suspensions with higher concentration. But, it also removes flocs from the environment in which they were formed, possibly leading to floc growth or breakup. In this study, we compare these two methods to determine whether or not the flocs imaged in a settling chamber are representative of the flocs found in a turbulent suspension. For the experiments, flocs are formed from kaolinite and montmorillonite clay mixed with saltwater at different concentrations and mixing conditions. The suspension is then imaged within the mixing tank, and samples from the mixing tank are imaged in a settling chamber. Results show that flocs imaged in the settling chamber tend to be slightly smaller than those imaged in the mixing chamber, though the differences are minimal if care is taken in the transfer process. Additional trends in the difference between the two methods with turbulent shear rate and concentration are discussed.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

Full Text Available