Search for: All records

Recently, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been applied for scheduling jobs over clusters, achieving better performance than hand-crafted heuristics. Despite their impressive performance, concerns remain over whether these GNN-based job schedulers meet users’ expectations about other important properties, such as strategy-proofness, sharing incentive, and stability. In this work, we consider formal verification of GNN-based job schedulers. We address several domain-specific challenges such as networks that are deeper and specifications that are richer than those encountered when verifying image and NLP classifiers. We develop vegas, the first general framework for verifying both single-step and multi-step properties of these schedulers based on carefully designed algorithms that combine abstractions, refinements, solvers, and proof transfer. Our experimental results show that vegas achieves significant speed-up when verifying important properties of a state-of-the-art GNN-based scheduler compared to previous methods. 

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved immense popularity in areas like computer vision, image processing, speech proccessing, and many others. Unfortunately, despite their excellent performance, they are prone to producing erroneous results — for example, minor perturbations to their inputs can result in severe classification errors. In this paper, we present the CNN-ABS framework, which implements an abstraction-refinement based scheme for CNN verification. Specifically, CNN-ABS simplifies the verification problem through the removal of convolutional connections in a way that soundly creates an over-approximation of the original problem; it then iteratively restores these connections if the resulting problem becomes too abstract. CNN-ABS is designed to use existing verification engines as a backend, and our evaluation demonstrates that it can significantly boost the performance of a state-of-the-art DNN verification engine, reducing runtime by 15.7% on average. 

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are increasingly being employed in safety-critical systems, and there is an urgent need to guarantee their correctness. Consequently, the verification community has devised multiple techniques and tools for verifying DNNs. When DNN verifiers discover an input that triggers an error, that is easy to confirm; but when they report that no error exists, there is no way to ensure that the verification tool itself is not flawed. As multiple errors have already been observed in DNN verification tools, this calls the applicability of DNN verification into question. In this work, we present a novel mechanism for enhancing Simplex-based DNN verifiers with proof production capabilities: the generation of an easy-to-check witness of unsatisfiability, which attests to the absence of errors. Our proof production is based on an efficient adaptation of the well-known Farkas' lemma, combined with mechanisms for handling piecewise-linear functions and numerical precision errors. As a proof of concept, we implemented our technique on top of the Marabou DNN verifier. Our evaluation on a safety-critical system for airborne collision avoidance shows that proof production succeeds in almost all cases and requires only minimal overhead. 

Inspired by sum-of-infeasibilities methods in convex optimization, we propose a novel procedure for analyzing verification queries on neural networks with piecewise-linear activation functions. Given a convex relaxation which over-approximates the non-convex activation functions, we encode the violations of activation functions as a cost function and optimize it with respect to the convex relaxation. The cost function, referred to as the Sum-of-Infeasibilities (SoI), is designed so that its minimum is zero and achieved only if all the activation functions are satisfied. We propose a stochastic procedure, DeepSoI, to efficiently minimize the SoI. An extension to a canonical case-analysis-based complete search procedure can be achieved by replacing the convex procedure executed at each search state with DeepSoI. Extending the complete search with DeepSoI achieves multiple simultaneous goals: 1) it guides the search towards a counter-example; 2) it enables more informed branching decisions; and 3) it creates additional opportunities for bound derivation. An extensive evaluation across different benchmarks and solvers demonstrates the benefit of the proposed techniques. In particular, we demonstrate that SoI significantly improves the performance of an existing complete search procedure. Moreover, the SoI-based implementation outperforms other state-of-the-art complete verifiers. We also show that our technique can efficiently improve upon the perturbation bound derived by a recent adversarial attack algorithm. 

Neural networks can learn complex, non-convex functions, and it is challenging to guarantee their correct behavior in safety-critical contexts. Many approaches exist to find failures in networks (e.g., adversarial examples), but these cannot guarantee the absence of failures. Verification algorithms address this need and provide formal guarantees about a neural network by answering "yes or no" questions. For example, they can answer whether a violation exists within certain bounds. However, individual "yes or no" questions cannot answer qualitative questions such as “what is the largest error within these bounds”; the answers to these lie in the domain of optimization. Therefore, we propose strategies to extend existing verifiers to perform optimization and find: (i) the most extreme failure in a given input region and (ii) the minimum input perturbation required to cause a failure. A naive approach using a bisection search with an off-the-shelf verifier results in many expensive and overlapping calls to the verifier. Instead, we propose an approach that tightly integrates the optimization process into the verification procedure, achieving better runtime performance than the naive approach. We evaluate our approach implemented as an extension of Marabou, a state-of-the-art neural network verifier, and compare its performance with the bisection approach and MIPVerify, an optimization-based verifier. We observe complementary performance between our extension of Marabou and MIPVerify 

In recent years, cloud service providers have sold computation in increasingly granular units. Most recently, "serverless" executors run a single executable with restricted network access and for a limited time. The beneft of these restrictions is scale: thousand-way parallelism can be allocated in seconds, and CPU time is billed with sub-second granularity. To exploit these executors, we introduce gg-SAT: an implementation of divide-and-conquer SAT solving. Infrastructurally, gg-SAT departs substantially from previous implementations: rather than handling process or server management itself, gg-SAT builds on the gg framework, allowing computations to be executed on a confgurable backend, including serverless offerings such as AWS Lambda. Our experiments suggest that when run on the same hardware, gg-SAT performs competitively with other D&C solvers, and that the 1000-way parallelism it offers (through AWS Lambda) is useful for some challenging SAT instances. 

We introduce DeepCert, a tool-supported method for verifying the robustness of deep neural network (DNN) image classifiers to contextually relevant perturbations such as blur, haze, and changes in image contrast. While the robustness of DNN classifiers has been the subject of intense research in recent years, the solutions delivered by this research focus on verifying DNN robustness to small perturbations in the images being classified, with perturbation magnitude measured using established 𝐿𝑝 norms. This is useful for identifying potential adversarial attacks on DNN image classifiers, but cannot verify DNN robustness to contextually relevant image perturbations, which are typically not small when expressed with 𝐿𝑝 norms. DeepCert addresses this underexplored verification problem by supporting: (1) the encoding of real-world image perturbations; (2) the systematic evaluation of contextually relevant DNN robustness, using both testing and formal verification; (3) the generation of contextually relevant counterexamples; and, through these, (4) the selection of DNN image classifiers suitable for the operational context (i) envisaged when a potentially safety-critical system is designed, or (ii) observed by a deployed system. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DeepCert by showing how it can be used to verify the robustness of DNN image classifiers build for two benchmark datasets (‘German Traffic Sign’ and ‘CIFAR-10’) to multiple contextually relevant perturbations. 

Deep learning has emerged as an effective approach for creating modern software systems, with neural networks often surpassing hand-crafted systems. Unfortunately, neural networks are known to suffer from various safety and security issues. Formal verification is a promising avenue for tackling this difficulty, by formally certifying that networks are correct. We propose an SMT-based technique for verifying binarized neural networks — a popular kind of neural network, where some weights have been binarized in order to render the neural network more memory and energy efficient, and quicker to evaluate. One novelty of our technique is that it allows the verification of neural networks that include both binarized and non-binarized components. Neural network verification is computationally very difficult, and so we propose here various optimizations, integrated into our SMT procedure as deduction steps, as well as an approach for parallelizing verification queries. We implement our technique as an extension to the Marabou framework, and use it to evaluate the approach on popular binarized neural network architectures. 

The ACAS X family of aircraft collision avoidance systems uses large numeric lookup tables to make decisions. Recent work used a deep neural network to approximate and compress a collision avoidance table, and simulations showed that the neural network performance was comparable to the original table. Consequently, neural network representations are being explored for use on small aircraft with limited storage capacity. However, the black-box nature of deep neural networks raises safety concerns because simulation results are not exhaustive. This work takes steps towards addressing these concerns by applying formal methods to analyze the behavior of collision avoidance neural networks both in isolation and in a closed-loop system. We evaluate our approach on a specific set of collision avoidance networks and show that even though the networks are not always locally robust, their closed-loop behavior ensures that they will not reach an unsafe (collision) state. 

Inspired by recent successes of parallel techniques for solving Boolean satisfiability, we investigate a set of strategies and heuristics to leverage parallelism and improve the scalability of neural network verification. We present a general description of the Split-and-Conquer partitioning algorithm, implemented within the Marabou framework, and discuss its parameters and heuristic choices. In particular, we explore two novel partitioning strategies, that partition the input space or the phases of the neuron activations, respectively. We introduce a branching heuristic and a direction heuristic that are based on the notion of polarity. We also introduce a highly parallelizable pre-processing algorithm for simplifying neural network verification problems. An extensive experimental evaluation shows the benefit of these techniques on both existing and new benchmarks. A preliminary experiment ultra-scaling our algorithm using a large distributed cloud-based platform also shows promising results.