skip to main content


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 1818858

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. A spatial channel network (SCN) was recently proposed toward the forthcoming spatial division multiplexing (SDM) era, in which the optical layer is explicitly evolved to the hierarchical SDM and wavelength division multiplexing layers, and an optical node is decoupled into a spatial cross-connect (SXC) and wavelength cross-connect to achieve an ultrahigh-capacity optical network in a highly economical manner. In this paper, we report feasibility demonstrations of an evolution scenario regarding the SCN architecture to enhance the flexibility and functionality of spatial channel networking from a simplefixed-core-accessanddirectionalspatial channel ring network to a multidegree,any-core-access,nondirectional, andcore-contentionlessmesh SCN. As key building blocks of SXCs, we introduce what we believe to be novel optical devices: a1×<#comment/>2multicore fiber (MCF) splitter, a core selector (CS), and a core and port selector (CPS). We construct free-space optics-based prototypes of these devices using five-core MCFs. Detailed performance evaluations of the prototypes in terms of the insertion loss (IL), polarization-dependent loss (PDL), and intercore cross talk (XT) are conducted. The results show that the prototypes provide satisfactorily low levels of IL, PDL, and XT. We construct a wide variety of reconfigurable spatial add/drop multiplexers (RSADMs) and SXCs in terms of node degree, interport cross-connection architecture, and add/drop port connectivity flexibilities. Such RSADMs/SXCs include a fixed-core-access and directional RSADM using a1×<#comment/>2MCF splitter; an any-core-access, nondirectional SXC with core-contention using a CS; and an any-core-access, nondirectional SXC without core-contention using a CPS. Bit error rate performance measurements for SDM signals that traverse the RSADMs/SXCs confirm that there is no or a very slight optical signal-to-noise-ratio penalty from back-to-back performance. We also experimentally show that the flexibilities in the add/drop port of the SXCs allow us to recover from a single or concurrent double link failure with a wide variety of options in terms of availability and cost-effectiveness.

     
    more » « less
  2. Elastic optical networks (EONs) are able to provide high spectrum utilization efficiency due to flexibility in resource assignment. In translucent EONs, by employing regenerators and using advanced modulation formats for transmission, spectrum efficiency can be further improved. Survivability is regarded as an important aspect of EONs, and p-cycle protection is considered to be an attractive scheme due to its fast restoration and high protection efficiency. In this paper, we propose methods for evaluating and selecting p-cycles for both link protection (LP) and failure-independent path protection (FIPP) to survive single-link failures. After considering the various factors that affect the performance of a p-cycle, we propose two evaluation metrics for LP and FIPP, namely, individual p-cycle cost and set of cycles cost. Based on these metrics, we propose two algorithms for selecting a set of p-cycles in translucent EONs: Traffic Independent P-cycle Selection (TIPS), which selects a set of cycles without knowledge of the traffic, and Traffic-Oriented P-cycle Selection (TOPS), which takes given traffic information into account. A routing and spectrum assignment algorithm is designed for translucent EONs, and our p-cycle design algorithms are evaluated using both static and dynamic traffic models. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithms have better performance than commonly used baseline algorithms. We also compare the performance of LP p-cycles and FIPP p-cycles.

     
    more » « less