Search for: All records

The hippocampus is thought to enable the encoding and retrieval of ongoing experience, the organization of that experience into structured representations like contexts, maps, and schemas, and the use of these structures to plan for the future. A central goal is to understand what the core computations supporting these functions are, and how these computations are realized in the collective action of single neurons. A potential access point into this issue is provided by ‘splitter cells’, hippocampal neurons that fire differentially on the overlapping segment of trajectories that differ in their past and/or future. However, the literature on splitter cells has been fragmented and confusing, owing to differences in terminology, behavioral tasks, and analysis methods across studies. In this review, we synthesize consistent findings from this literature, establish a common set of terms, and translate between single-cell and ensemble perspectives. Most importantly, we examine the combined findings through the lens of two major theoretical ideas about hippocampal function: representation of temporal context and latent state inference. We find that unique signature properties of each of these models are necessary to account for the data, but neither theory, by itself, explains all of its features. Specifically, the temporal gradedness of the splitter signal is strong support for temporal context, but is hard to explain using state models, while its flexibility and task-dependence is naturally accounted for using state inference, but poses a challenge otherwise. These theories suggest a number of avenues for future work, and we believe their application to splitter cells is a timely and informative domain for testing and refining theoretical ideas about hippocampal function. 

Abstract Decades of rodent research have established the role of hippocampal sharp wave ripples (SPW-Rs) in consolidating and guiding experience. More recently, intracranial recordings in humans have suggested their role in episodic and semantic memory. Yet, common standards for recording, detection, and reporting do not exist. Here, we outline the methodological challenges involved in detecting ripple events and offer practical recommendations to improve separation from other high-frequency oscillations. We argue that shared experimental, detection, and reporting standards will provide a solid foundation for future translational discovery. 

Patterns of neural activity that occur spontaneously during sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events in the hippocampus are thought to play an important role in memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Typical studies examining the content of SWRs seek to determine whether the identity and/or temporal order of cell firing is different from chance. Such ‘first-order’ analyses are focused on a single time point and template (map), and have been used to show, for instance, the existence of preplay. The major methodological challenge in first-order analyses is the construction and interpretation of different chance distributions. By contrast, ‘second-order’ analyses involve a comparison of SWR content between different time points, and/or between different templates. Typical second-order questions include tests of experience-dependence (replay) that compare SWR content before and after experience, and comparisons or replay between different arms of a maze. Such questions entail additional methodological challenges that can lead to biases in results and associated interpretations. We provide an inventory of analysis challenges for second-order questions about SWR content, and suggest ways of preventing, identifying and addressing possible analysis biases. Given evolving interest in understanding SWR content in more complex experimental scenarios and across different time scales, we expect these issues to become increasingly pervasive. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future’.