Search for: All records

Abstract MXenes are promising passive components that enable lithium‐sulfur batteries (LSBs) by effectively trapping lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and facilitating surface‐mediated redox reactions. Despite numerous studies highlighting the potential of MXenes in LSBs, there are no systematic studies of MXenes’ composition influence on polysulfide adsorption, which is foundational to their applications in LSB. Here, a comprehensive investigation of LiPS adsorption on seven MXenes with varying chemistries (Ti₂CT_x, Ti₃C₂T_x, Ti₃CNT_x, Mo₂TiC₂T_x, V₂CT_x, Nb₂CT_x, and Nb₄C₃T_x), utilizing optical and analytical spectroscopic methods is performed. This work reports on the influence of polysulfide concentration, interaction time, and MXenes’ chemistry (transition metal layer, carbide and carbonitride inner layer, surface terminations and structure) on the amount of adsorbed LiPSs and the adsorption mechanism. These findings reveal the formation of insoluble thiosulfate and polythionate complex species on the surfaces of all tested MXenes. Furthermore, the selective adsorption of lithium and sulfur, and the extent of conversion of the adsorbed species on MXenes varied based on their chemistry. For instance, Ti₂CT_xexhibits a strong tendency to adsorb lithium ions, while Mo₂TiC₂T_xis effective in trapping sulfur by forming long‐chain polythionates. The latter demonstrates a significant conversion of intermediate polysulfides into low‐order species. This study offers valuable guidance for the informed selection of MXenes in various functional components benefiting the future development of high‐performance LSBs. 

Comparison of Li-SPAN pouch cells with and without lithium treatment. The Li-SPAN pouch cell with the PVDF-HFP : DMF lithium treatment shows a LiF rich SEI. 

In Li–S batteries, the insulating nature of sulfur and Li 2 S causes enormous challenges, such as high polarization and low active material utilization. The nucleation of the solid discharge product, Li 2 S, during the discharge cycle, and the activation of Li 2 S in the subsequent charge cycle, cause a potential challenge that needs to be overcome. Moreover, the shuttling of soluble lithium polysulfide intermediate species results in active material loss and early capacity fade. In this study, we have used thiourea as an electrolyte additive and showed that it serves as both a redox mediator to overcome the Li 2 S activation energy barrier and a shuttle inhibitor to mitigate the notorious polysulfide shuttling via the investigation of thiourea redox activity, shuttle current measurements and study of Li 2 S activation. The steady-state shuttle current of the Li–S battery shows a 6-fold drop when 0.02 M thiourea is added to the standard electrolyte. Moreover, by adding thiourea, the charge plateau for the first cycle of the Li 2 S based cathodes shifts from 3.5 V (standard ether electrolyte) to 2.5 V (with 0.2 M thiourea). Using this additive, the capacity of the Li–S battery stabilizes at ∼839 mA h g −1 after 5 cycles and remains stable over 700 cycles with a low capacity decay rate of 0.025% per cycle, a tremendous improvement compared to the reference battery that retains only ∼350 mA h g −1 after 300 cycles. In the end, to demonstrate the practical and broad applicability of thiourea in overcoming sulfur-battery challenges and in eliminating the need for complex electrode design, we study two additional battery systems – lithium metal-free cells with a graphite anode and Li 2 S cathode, and Li–S cells with simple slurry-based cathodes fabricated via blending commercial carbon black/S and a binder. We believe that this study manifests the advantages of redox active electrolyte additives to overcome several bottlenecks in the Li–S battery field.