Search for: All records

ABSTRACT This data paper presents data obtained from E‐Defense shake‐table tests of a full‐scale, steel moment‐resisting frame (MRF) supplemented with Spines. Herein, the Spines were pin‐based columns with sufficient stiffness and strength to distribute plastic deformation evenly over the height of the MRF. The specimen was tested under two configurations: first, with the Spine rigidly connected to the MRF; second, with the Spine connected to the MRF through force‐limiting connections (FLCs). Each specimen configuration underwent earthquake simulations using ground motions with two scale factors. The tests demonstrated the expected benefits of Spines as well as the disadvantage of inducing large floor accelerations in the structure and large shear forces in the Spines. The tests also demonstrated how the FLCs can mitigate these disadvantages. This data paper reports an overview of the tests, data archive structure, and potential use of the data. The data can be used, for example, to reproduce the observations presented by the authors, to compare the dynamic response of the specimen with building specimens tested in other shake‐table test programs, to validate numerical models against the measured specimen response, or to formulate classroom exercises on system identification of linear and nonlinear systems. 

Abstract In light of the significant damage observed after earthquakes in Japan and New Zealand, enhanced performing seismic force‐resisting systems and energy dissipation devices are increasingly being utilized in buildings. Numerical models are needed to estimate the seismic response of these systems for seismic design or assessment. While there have been studies on modeling uncertainty, selecting the model features most important to response can remain ambiguous, especially if the structure employs less well‐established lateral force‐resisting systems and components. Herein, a global sensitivity analysis was used to address modeling uncertainty in specimens with elastic spines and force‐limiting connections (FLCs) physically tested at full‐scale at the E‐Defense shake table in Japan. Modeling uncertainty was addressed for both model class and model parameter uncertainty by varying primary models to develop several secondary models according to pre‐established uncertainty groups. Numerical estimates of peak story drift ratio and floor acceleration were compared to the results from the experimental testing program using confidence intervals and root‐mean‐square error. Metrics such as the coefficient of variation, variance, linear Pearson correlation coefficient, and Sobol index were used to gain intuition about each model feature's contribution to the dispersion in estimates of the engineering demands. Peak floor acceleration was found to be more sensitive to modeling uncertainty compared to story drift ratio. Assumptions for the spine‐to‐frame connection significantly impacted estimates of peak floor accelerations, which could influence future design methods for spines and FLC in enhanced lateral‐force resisting systems. 

This dataset contains data from E-Defense shake-table tests of a full-scale, steel moment-resisting frame (MRF) supplemented with spines. Herein, the spines were pin-based columns with sufficient stiffness and strength to distribute plastic deformation evenly over the height of the MRF. The specimen was tested under two configurations: first, with the spine rigidly connected to the MRF; and second, with the spine connected to the MRF through Force-Limiting Connections (FLCs). The two structural systems were subjected to two ground motions adjusted to two different scales. The tests highlighted the expected benefits of spines as well as their drawbacks of inducing large floor acceleration in the MRF and large shear forces in the spines themselves. The tests also highlighted how the FLCs can mitigate such drawbacks of spines. The data may be used, for example, to reproduce the observations presented by the authors, to compare the dynamic response of the specimen with building specimens tested in other shake-table test programs, to validate numerical models against the measured specimen response, or to formulate classroom exercises on system identification of linear and nonlinear systems. 

This paper presents an experimental study on the multidirectional cyclic lateral-load response of post-tensioned self-centering (SC) cross-laminated timber (CLT) shear walls. SC-CLT shear wall damage states are introduced and qualitatively defined in terms of the repairs needed to restore the lateral-load response of the SC-CLT wall. A comparison between SC-CLT wall damage states under unidirectional (in-plane) and multidirectional (in-plane and out-of-plane) lateral loading is presented. The experimental results show that the initiation of SC-CLT wall damage occurs at smaller story drifts under multidirectional loading compared to unidirectional loading. Engineering demand parameters (EDPs) are used to quantify the SC-CLT wall damage states. Uncertainty in the EDP value when a damage state occurs is considered and quantified. Using the experimental results, component (i.e., a CLT wall panel corner) and system (i.e., an entire SC-CLT wall) fragility functions are developed and presented.