Conventional lateral force-resisting systems can provide a stable, ductile response but also experience significant inelastic demands, rendering repairs impractical or uneconomical. Thus, there is a need for novel structural systems that protect structural and nonstructural components to reduce post-earthquake repairs and downtime. A U.S.-Japan research team –
including three U.S. universities, two Japanese universities, and two major experimental research labs – is developing a structural solution to reduce peak drift and acceleration demands, thereby protecting buildings, their contents, and occupants during major earthquakes. The primary components of the system are: (1) steel base moment-resisting frames designed and detailed to behave in the inelastic range and dissipate energy, (2) stiff and strong elastic spines designed to remain essentially elastic to redistribute seismic demands more uniformly over the building height, and (3) force-limiting connections (FLC) that connect the frame to the spines to provide a yielding mechanism that limits acceleration demands. This economical earthquake-resilient system is intended to be used in essential facilities, such as hospitals, where damage to the buildings and contents and occupant injuries must be prevented and where continuity of operation is imperative. The system was recently tested at full scale at the E-Defense shake-table facility in Miki, Japan. This paper provides an overview of pre-test numerical simulations, shake-table test setup and instrumentation, and preliminary test results.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on July 26, 2024
Modeling uncertainty of specimens employing spines and force‐limiting connections tested at E‐defense shake table
In light of the significant damage observed after earthquakes in Japan and New Zealand, enhanced performing seismic force‐resisting systems and energy dissipation devices are increasingly being utilized in buildings. Numerical models are needed to estimate the seismic response of these systems for seismic design or assessment. While there have been studies on modeling uncertainty, selecting the model features most important to response can remain ambiguous, especially if the structure employs less well‐established lateral force‐resisting systems and components. Herein, a global sensitivity analysis was used to address modeling uncertainty in specimens with elastic spines and force‐limiting connections (FLCs) physically tested at full‐scale at the E‐Defense shake table in Japan. Modeling uncertainty was addressed for both model class and model parameter uncertainty by varying primary models to develop several secondary models according to pre‐established uncertainty groups. Numerical estimates of peak story drift ratio and floor acceleration were compared to the results from the experimental testing program using confidence intervals and root‐mean‐square error. Metrics such as the coefficient of variation, variance, linear Pearson correlation coefficient, and Sobol index were used to gain intuition about each model feature's contribution to the dispersion in estimates of the engineering demands. Peak floor acceleration was found to be more sensitive to modeling uncertainty compared to story drift ratio. Assumptions for the spine‐to‐frame connection significantly impacted estimates of peak floor accelerations, which could influence future design methods for spines and FLC in enhanced lateral‐force resisting systems.
more » « less- Award ID(s):
- 1928906
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10441508
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
- Volume:
- 52
- Issue:
- 14
- ISSN:
- 0098-8847
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 4638-4659
- Size(s):
- ["p. 4638-4659"]
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
more » « less
Abstract Nonlinear response history analysis (NLRHA) is generally considered to be a reliable and robust method to assess the seismic performance of buildings under strong ground motions. While NLRHA is fairly straightforward to evaluate individual structures for a select set of ground motions at a specific building site, it becomes less practical for performing large numbers of analyses to evaluate either (1) multiple models of alternative design realizations with a site‐specific set of ground motions, or (2) individual archetype building models at multiple sites with multiple sets of ground motions. In this regard, surrogate models offer an alternative to running repeated NLRHAs for variable design realizations or ground motions. In this paper, a recently developed surrogate modeling technique, called probabilistic learning on manifolds (PLoM), is presented to estimate structural seismic response. Essentially, the PLoM method provides an efficient stochastic model to develop mappings between random variables, which can then be used to efficiently estimate the structural responses for systems with variations in design/modeling parameters or ground motion characteristics. The PLoM algorithm is introduced and then used in two case studies of 12‐story buildings for estimating probability distributions of structural responses. The first example focuses on the mapping between variable design parameters of a multidegree‐of‐freedom analysis model and its peak story drift and acceleration responses. The second example applies the PLoM technique to estimate structural responses for variations in site‐specific ground motion characteristics. In both examples, training data sets are generated for orthogonal input parameter grids, and test data sets are developed for input parameters with prescribed statistical distributions. Validation studies are performed to examine the accuracy and efficiency of the PLoM models. Overall, both examples show good agreement between the PLoM model estimates and verification data sets. Moreover, in contrast to other common surrogate modeling techniques, the PLoM model is able to preserve correlation structure between peak responses. Parametric studies are conducted to understand the influence of different PLoM tuning parameters on its prediction accuracy.
-
Steel moment-resisting frames (MRFs) are widely used in the United States to resist seismic forces. MRFs have many advantages, including high ductility, architectural versatility, and vetted member and connection detailing requirements. However, MRFs require large members to meet story drift criteria. Moreover, strong-column-weak-beam requirements can result in significant member sizes, and – even in the cases where strong-column-weak-beam requirements are satisfied – MRFs can still be vulnerable to story mechanisms in one or a few stories. Recently, the concept of a strongback has been utilized successfully to delay or prevent story mechanism behavior in braced frames. The strongback is represented by a steel truss or column that is designed to remain essentially elastic, thus allowing the system to transfer inelastic demands across stories. Although systems including strongbacks exhibit more uniform story drift demands with building height and reduced peak drift response, the elastic nature of the strongback can also result in near-elastic higher-mode force demands. This study compares the dynamic response of a baseline MRF to that of a retrofit using a strongback column. Several ground motions are considered to determine which cases produce the largest drift, acceleration, and force demands.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Nonstructural components within mission-critical facilities such as hospitals and telecommunication facilities are vital to a community's resilience when subjected to a seismic event. Building contents like medical and computer equipment are critical for the response and recovery process following an earthquake. A solution to protecting these systems from seismic hazards is base isolation. Base isolation systems are designed to decouple an entire building structure from destructive ground motions. For other buildings not fitted with base isolation, a practical and economical solution to protect vital building contents from earthquake-induced floor motion is to isolate individual equipment using, for example, rolling-type isolation systems (RISs). RISs are a relatively new innovation for protecting equipment. These systems function as a pendulum-like mechanism to convert horizontal motion into vertical motion. An accompanying change in potential energy creates a restoring force related to the slope of the rolling surface. This study seeks to evaluate the seismic hazard mitigation performance of RISs, as well as propose and test a novel double RIS. A physics-based mathematical model was developed for a single RIS via Lagrange's equation adhering to the kinetic constraint of rolling without slipping. The mathematical model for the single RIS was used to predict the response and characteristics of these systems. A physical model was fabricated with additive manufacturing and tested against multiple earthquakes on a shake table. The system featured a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) structure to represent a piece of equipment. The results showed that the RIS effectively reduced accelerations felt by the SDOF compared to a fixed-base SDOF system. The single RIS experienced the most substantial accelerations from the Mendocino record, which contains low-frequency content in the range of the RIS's natural period (1-2 seconds). Earthquakes with these long-period components have the potential to cause impacts within the isolation bearing that would degrade its performance. To accommodate large displacements, a double RIS is proposed. The double RIS has twice the displacement capacity of a single RIS without increasing the size of the bearing components. The mathematical model for the single RIS was extended to the double RIS following a similar procedure. Two approaches were used to evaluate the double RIS's performance: stochastic and deterministic. The stochastic response of the double RIS under stationary white noise excitation was evaluated for relevant system parameters, namely mass ratio and tuning frequency. Both broadband and filtered (Kanai-Tajimi) white noise excitation were considered. The response variances of the double RIS were normalized by a baseline single RIS for a comparative study, from which design parameter maps were drawn. A deterministic analysis was conducted to further evaluate the double RIS in the case of nonstationary excitation. The telecommunication equipment qualification waveform, VERTEQ-II, was used for these numerical simulations. Peak transient responses were compared to the single RIS responses, and optimal design regions were determined. General design guidelines based on the stochastic and deterministic analyses are given. The results aim to provide a framework usable in the preliminary design stage of a double RIS to mitigate seismic responses.more » « less
-
A vast amount of experimental and analytical research has been conducted related to the seismic behavior and performance of concrete filled steel tubular (CFT) columns. This research has resulted in a wealth of information on the component behavior. However, analytical and experimental data for structural systems with CFT columns is limited, and the well known behavior of steel or concrete structures is assumed valid for designing these systems. This paper presents the development of an analytical model for nonlinear analysis of composite moment resisting frame (CFT MRF) systems with CFT columns and steel wide flange (WF) beams under seismic loading. The model integrates component models for steel WF beams, CFT columns, connections between CFT columns and WF beams, and CFT panel zones. These component models account for nonlinear behavior due to steel yielding and local buckling in the beams and columns, concrete cracking and crushing in the columns, and yielding of panel zones and connections. Component tests were used to validate the component models. The model for a CFT MRF considers second order geometric effects from the gravity load bearing system using a lean on column. The experimental results from the testing of a four story CFT MRF test structure are used as a benchmark to validate the modeling procedure. An analytical model of the test structure was created using the modeling procedure and imposed displacement analyses were used to reproduce the tests with the analytical model of the test structure. Good agreement was found at the global and local level. The model reproduced reasonably well the story shear story drift response as well as the column, beam and connection moment rotation response, but overpredicted the inelastic deformation of the panel zone.more » « less
