skip to main content


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 1942937

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Much of lifelong learning is driven by our curiosity to ask ourselves questions about the things around us in everyday life. Unfortunately, we often fail to pursue these questions to acquire new knowledge, resulting in missed opportunities for lifelong learning. We investigated two approaches to technological support for lifelong learning from question-asking in everyday life: an in-situ approach – reflecting and learning in the situatedness of the moment when a question is asked, and a post hoc approach – self-reflecting and learning after the question-asking moment when one is available to reflect. The in-situ approach may enable people to tap into their embodied experience to gain understanding, while a post hoc approach may allow people to allocate greater cognitive and material resources to explore and understand. We implemented two systems embodying each of the two approaches. A study was conducted to compare the use of the two learning support systems in an everyday virtual environment. Results showed that the post hoc approach produces more curiosity questions and reflection than the in-situ approach. We discuss the implications of our results for the design of systems to support lifelong learning. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available November 19, 2024
  2. A good amount of research has explored the use of wearables for educational or learning purposes. We have now reached a point when much literature can be found on that topic, but few attempts have been made to make sense of that literature from a holistic perspective. This paper presents a systematic review of the literature on wearables for learning. Literature was sourced from conferences and journals pertaining to technology and education, and through anad hocsearch. Our review focuses on identifying the ways that wearables have been used to support learning, and provides perspectives on that issue from a historical dimension, and with regards to the types of wearables used, the populations targeted, and the settings addressed. Seven different ways of how wearables have been used to support learning were identified. We propose a framework identifying five main components that have been addressed in existing research on how wearables can support learning, and present our interpretations of unaddressed research directions based on our review results.

     
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available November 9, 2024
  3. Wearable devices are a popular class of portable ubiquitous technology. These devices are available in a variety of forms, ranging from smart glasses to smart rings. The fact that smart wearable devices are attached to the body makes them particularly suitable to be integrated into people’s daily lives. Thus, we propose that wearables can be particularly useful to help people make sense of different kinds of information and situations in the course of their everyday activities, in other words, to help support learning in everyday life. Further, different forms of wearables have different affordances leading to varying perceptions and preferences, depending on the purpose and context of use. While there is research on wearable use in the learning context, it is mostly limited to specific settings and usually only explores wearable use for a specific task. This paper presents an online survey with 70 participants conducted to understand users’ preferences and perceptions of how wearables may be used to support learning in their everyday life. Multiple ways of use of wearable for learning were proposed. Asking for information was the most common learning-oriented use. The smartwatch/wristband, followed by the smart glasses, was the most preferred wearable form factor to support learning. Our survey results also showed that the choice of wearable type to use for learning is associated with prior wearable experience and that perceived social influence of wearables decreases significantly with gain in the experience with a fitness tracker. Overall, our study indicates that wearable devices have untapped potential to be used for learning in daily life and different form factors are perceived to afford different functions and used for different purposes. 
    more » « less