skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Supporting lifelong learning: Comparing an in-situ and a post hoc approach to support everyday question-asking
Much of lifelong learning is driven by our curiosity to ask ourselves questions about the things around us in everyday life. Unfortunately, we often fail to pursue these questions to acquire new knowledge, resulting in missed opportunities for lifelong learning. We investigated two approaches to technological support for lifelong learning from question-asking in everyday life: an in-situ approach – reflecting and learning in the situatedness of the moment when a question is asked, and a post hoc approach – self-reflecting and learning after the question-asking moment when one is available to reflect. The in-situ approach may enable people to tap into their embodied experience to gain understanding, while a post hoc approach may allow people to allocate greater cognitive and material resources to explore and understand. We implemented two systems embodying each of the two approaches. A study was conducted to compare the use of the two learning support systems in an everyday virtual environment. Results showed that the post hoc approach produces more curiosity questions and reflection than the in-situ approach. We discuss the implications of our results for the design of systems to support lifelong learning.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1942937
PAR ID:
10494580
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
International Forum of Educational Technology & Society
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Educational Technology & Society,
ISSN:
1436-4522
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering)
    null (Ed.)
    Virtual conversational assistants designed specifically for software engineers could have a huge impact on the time it takes for software engineers to get help. Research efforts are focusing on virtual assistants that support specific software development tasks such as bug repair and pair programming. In this paper, we study the use of online chat platforms as a resource towards collecting developer opinions that could potentially help in building opinion Q&A systems, as a specialized instance of virtual assistants and chatbots for software engineers. Opinion Q&A has a stronger presence in chats than in other developer communications, thus mining them can provide a valuable resource for developers in quickly getting insight about a specific development topic (e.g., What is the best Java library for parsing JSON?). We address the problem of opinion Q&A extraction by developing automatic identification of opinion-asking questions and extraction of participants’ answers from public online developer chats. We evaluate our automatic approaches on chats spanning six programming communities and two platforms. Our results show that a heuristic approach to opinion-asking questions works well (.87 precision), and a deep learning approach customized to the software domain outperforms heuristics-based, machine-learning-based and deep learning for answer extraction in community question answering. 
    more » « less
  2. ; (, Education and information technologies)
    Wearable devices are a popular class of portable ubiquitous technology. These devices are available in a variety of forms, ranging from smart glasses to smart rings. The fact that smart wearable devices are attached to the body makes them particularly suitable to be integrated into people’s daily lives. Thus, we propose that wearables can be particularly useful to help people make sense of different kinds of information and situations in the course of their everyday activities, in other words, to help support learning in everyday life. Further, different forms of wearables have different affordances leading to varying perceptions and preferences, depending on the purpose and context of use. While there is research on wearable use in the learning context, it is mostly limited to specific settings and usually only explores wearable use for a specific task. This paper presents an online survey with 70 participants conducted to understand users’ preferences and perceptions of how wearables may be used to support learning in their everyday life. Multiple ways of use of wearable for learning were proposed. Asking for information was the most common learning-oriented use. The smartwatch/wristband, followed by the smart glasses, was the most preferred wearable form factor to support learning. Our survey results also showed that the choice of wearable type to use for learning is associated with prior wearable experience and that perceived social influence of wearables decreases significantly with gain in the experience with a fitness tracker. Overall, our study indicates that wearable devices have untapped potential to be used for learning in daily life and different form factors are perceived to afford different functions and used for different purposes. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; (, Springer Nature Singapore)
    Privacy policies are often lengthy and complex legal documents, and are difficult for many people to read and comprehend. Recent research efforts have explored automated assistants that process the language in policies and answer people’s privacy questions. This study documents the importance of two different types of reasoning necessary to generate accurate answers to people’s privacy questions. The first is the need to support taxonomic reasoning about related terms commonly found in privacy policies. The second is the need to reason about regulatory disclosure requirements, given the prevalence of silence in privacy policy texts. Specifically, we report on a study involving the collection of 749 sets of expert annotations to answer privacy questions in the context of 210 different policy/question pairs. The study highlights the importance of taxonomic reasoning and of reasoning about regulatory disclosure requirements when it comes to accurately answering everyday privacy questions. Next we explore to what extent current generative AI tools are able to reliably handle this type of reasoning. Our results suggest that in their current form and in the absence of additional help, current models cannot reliably support the type of reasoning about regulatory disclosure requirements necessary to accurately answer privacy questions. We proceed to introduce and evaluate different approaches to improving their performance. Through this work, we aim to provide a richer understanding of the capabilities automated systems need to have to provide accurate answers to everyday privacy questions and, in the process, outline paths for adapting AI models for this purpose. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; (, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology)
    null (Ed.)
    Software engineers are crowdsourcing answers to their everyday challenges on Q&A forums (e.g., Stack Overflow) and more recently in public chat communities such as Slack, IRC, and Gitter. Many software-related chat conversations contain valuable expert knowledge that is useful for both mining to improve programming support tools and for readers who did not participate in the original chat conversations. However, most chat platforms and communities do not contain built-in quality indicators (e.g., accepted answers, vote counts). Therefore, it is difficult to identify conversations that contain useful information for mining or reading, i.e., conversations of post hoc quality. In this article, we investigate automatically detecting developer conversations of post hoc quality from public chat channels. We first describe an analysis of 400 developer conversations that indicate potential characteristics of post hoc quality, followed by a machine learning-based approach for automatically identifying conversations of post hoc quality. Our evaluation of 2,000 annotated Slack conversations in four programming communities (python, clojure, elm, and racket) indicates that our approach can achieve precision of 0.82, recall of 0.90, F-measure of 0.86, and MCC of 0.57. To our knowledge, this is the first automated technique for detecting developer conversations of post hoc quality. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, International Conference on Computers in Education)
    Question-asking is a crucial learning and teaching approach. It reveals different levels of students' understanding, application, and potential misconceptions. Previous studies have categorized question types into higher and lower orders, finding positive and significant associations between higher-order questions and students' critical thinking ability and their learning outcomes in different learning contexts. However, the diversity of higher-order questions, especially in collaborative learning environments. has left open the question of how they may be different from other types of dialogue that emerge from students' conversations, To address these questions, our study utilized natural language processing techniques to build a model and investigate the characteristics of students' higher-order questions. We interpreted these questions using Bloom's taxonomy, and our results reveal three types of higher-order questions during collaborative problem-solving. Students often use Why, How and What If' questions to I) understand the reason and thought process behind their partners' actions: 2) explore and analyze the project by pinpointing the problem: and 3) propose and evaluate ideas or alternative solutions. In addition. we found dialogue labeled 'Social'. 'Question - other', 'Directed at Agent', and 'Confusion/Help Seeking' shows similar underlying patterns to higher-order questions, Our findings provide insight into the different scenarios driving students' higher-order questions and inform the design of adaptive systems to deliver personalized feedback based on students' questions. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email