Search for: All records

Abstract Finding similarities between model parameters across different catchments has proved to be challenging. Existing approaches struggle due to catchment heterogeneity and non‐linear dynamics. In particular, attempts to correlate catchment attributes with hydrological responses have failed due to interdependencies among variables and consequent equifinality. Machine Learning (ML), particularly the Long Short‐Term Memory (LSTM) approach, has demonstrated strong predictive and spatial regionalization performance. However, understanding the nature of the regionalization relationships remains difficult. This study proposes a novel approach to partially decouple learning the representation of (a) catchment dynamics by using theHydroLSTMarchitecture and (b) spatial regionalization relationships by using aRandom Forest(RF) clustering approach to learn the relationships between the catchment attributes and dynamics. This coupled approach, calledRegional HydroLSTM, learns a representation of “potential streamflow” using a single cell‐state, while the output gate corrects it to correspond to the temporal context of the current hydrologic regime. RF clusters mediate the relationship between catchment attributes and dynamics, allowing identification of spatially consistent hydrological regions, thereby providing insight into the factors driving spatial and temporal hydrological variability. Results suggest that by combining complementary architectures, we can enhance the interpretability of regional machine learning models in hydrology, offering a new perspective on the “catchment classification” problem. We conclude that an improved understanding of the underlying nature of hydrologic systems can be achieved by careful design of ML architectures to target the specific things we are seeking to learn from the data. 

Abstract Groundwater is by far the largest unfrozen freshwater resource on the planet. It plays a critical role as the bottom of the hydrologic cycle, redistributing water in the subsurface and supporting plants and surface water bodies. However, groundwater has historically been excluded or greatly simplified in global models. In recent years, there has been an international push to develop global scale groundwater modeling and analysis. This progress has provided some critical first steps. Still, much additional work will be needed to achieve a consistent global groundwater framework that interacts seamlessly with observational datasets and other earth system and global circulation models. Here we outline a vision for a global groundwater platform for groundwater monitoring and prediction and identify the key technological and data challenges that are currently limiting progress. Any global platform of this type must be interdisciplinary and cannot be achieved by the groundwater modeling community in isolation. Therefore, we also provide a high‐level overview of the groundwater system, approaches to groundwater modeling and the current state of global groundwater representations, such that readers of all backgrounds can engage in this challenge. 

Several studies have demonstrated the ability of long short-term memory (LSTM) machine-learning-based modeling to outperform traditional spatially lumped process-based modeling approaches for streamflow prediction. However, due mainly to the structural complexity of the LSTM network (which includes gating operations and sequential processing of the data), difficulties can arise when interpreting the internal processes and weights in the model. Here, we propose and test a modification of LSTM architecture that is calibrated in a manner that is analogous to a hydrological system. Our architecture, called “HydroLSTM”, simulates the sequential updating of the Markovian storage while the gating operation has access to historical information. Specifically, we modify how data are fed to the new representation to facilitate simultaneous access to past lagged inputs and consolidated information, which explicitly acknowledges the importance of trends and patterns in the data. We compare the performance of the HydroLSTM and LSTM architectures using data from 10 hydro-climatically varied catchments. We further examine how the new architecture exploits the information in lagged inputs, for 588 catchments across the USA. The HydroLSTM-based models require fewer cell states to obtain similar performance to their LSTM-based counterparts. Further, the weight patterns associated with lagged input variables are interpretable and consistent with regional hydroclimatic characteristics (snowmelt-dominated, recent rainfall-dominated, and historical rainfall-dominated). These findings illustrate how the hydrological interpretability of LSTM-based models can be enhanced by appropriate architectural modifications that are physically and conceptually consistent with our understanding of the system.