Search for: All records

The relative composition of Earth's core and mantle were set during core formation. By determining how elements partition between metal and silicate at high pressures and temperatures, measurements of the mantle composition and geophysical observations of the core can be used to understand the mechanisms by which Earth formed. Here we present the results of metal‐silicate partitioning experiments for a range of nominally lithophile elements (Al, Ca, K, Mg, O, Si, Th, and U) and S to 85 GPa and up to 5400 K. With our results and a compilation of literature data, we developed a parameterization for partitioning that accounts for compositional dependencies in both the metal and silicate phases. Using this parameterization in a range of planetary growth models, we find that, in general, lithophile element partitioning into the metallic phase is enhanced at high temperatures. The relative abundances of FeO, SiO₂, and MgO in the mantle vary significantly between planetary growth models, and the mantle abundances of these elements can be used to provide important constraints on Earth's accretion. To match Earth's core mass and mantle composition, Earth's building blocks must have been enriched in Fe and depleted in Si compared with CI chondrites. Finally, too little Mg, Si, and O are partitioned into the core for precipitation of oxides to be a major source of energy for the geodynamo. In contrast, several ppb of U can be partitioned into the core at high temperatures, and this energy source must be accounted for in thermal evolution models.

A giant-impact origin for the Moon is generally accepted, but many aspects of lunar formation remain poorly understood and debated. Ćuk et al. proposed that an impact that left the Earth–Moon system with high obliquity and angular momentum could explain the Moon’s orbital inclination and isotopic similarity to Earth. In this scenario, instability during the Laplace Plane transition, when the Moon’s orbit transitions from the gravitational influence of Earth’s figure to that of the Sun, would both lower the system’s angular momentum to its present-day value and generate the Moon’s orbital inclination. Recently, Tian & Wisdom discovered new dynamical constraints on the Laplace Plane transition and concluded that the Earth–Moon system could not have evolved from an initial state with high obliquity. Here we demonstrate that the Earth–Moon system with an initially high obliquity can evolve into the present state, and we identify a spin–orbit secular resonance as a key dynamical mechanism in the later stages of the Laplace Plane transition. Some of the simulations by Tian & Wisdom did not encounter this late secular resonance, as their model suppressed obliquity tides and the resulting inclination damping. Our results demonstrate that a giant impact that left Earth with high angular momentum and high obliquity (θ> 61°) is a promising scenario for explaining many properties of the Earth–Moon system, including its angular momentum and obliquity, the geochemistry of Earth and the Moon, and the lunar inclination.