skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 1950370

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. The random forest can reduce the variance of regression predictors through bagging while leaving the bias mostly unchanged. In general, the bias is not negligible and consequently bias correction is necessary. The default bias correction method implemented in the R package randomForest often works poorly. Several approaches have been developed which in general outperform the R default. However, little work has been done to com- prehensively evaluate the performance of these methods and thus guide users to select an appropriate method for bias correction. This paper fills this gap by providing an informa- tive ranking of these bias correction methods based on an extensive numerical study. We further offered practical suggestions on the application of the winner of these methods and suggested a visualization technique to help users decide when bias correction is needed. Journal of Statistical Research 2022, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 115-131 
    more » « less