Search for: All records

Because quartz veins are common in fault zones exhumed from earthquake nucleation temperatures (150°C–350°C), quartz cementation may be an important mechanism of strength recovery between earthquakes. This interpretation requires that cementation occurs within a single interseismic period. We review slip‐related processes that have been argued to allow rapid quartz precipitation in faults, including: advection of silica‐saturated fluids, coseismic pore‐fluid pressure drops, frictional heating, dissolution‐precipitation creep, precipitation of amorphous phases, and variations in fluid and mineral‐surface chemistry. We assess the rate and magnitude of quartz growth that may result from each of the examined mechanisms. We find limitations to the kinetics and mass balance of silica precipitation that emphasize two end‐member regimes. First, the mechanisms we explore, given current kinetic constraints, cannot explain mesoscale fault‐fracture vein networks developing, even incrementally, on interseismic timescales. On the other hand, some mechanisms appear capable, isolated or in combination, of cementing micrometer‐to‐millimeter thick principal slip surfaces in days to years. This does not explain extensive vein networks in fault damage zones, but allows the involvement of quartz cements in fault healing. These end‐members lead us to hypothesize that high flux scenarios, although more important for voluminous hydrothermal mineralization, may be of subsidiary importance to local, diffusive mass transport in low fluid‐flux faults when discussing the mechanical implications of quartz cements. A renewed emphasis on the controls on quartz cementation rates in fault zones will, however, be integral to developing a more complete understanding of strength recovery following earthquake rupture.

Progressive cementation and sealing of fault-localized fractures impact crustal mass transport and the recovery of fault strength following slip events. We use discrete fracture network (DFN) models to examine how fracture sealing during end-member cementation mechanisms (i.e., reaction- versus transported-limited cementation) influences the partitioning of fluid flow through time. DfnWorks was used to generate randomized fracture networks parameterized with fracture orientation data compiled from field studies. Single-phase flow simulations were performed for each network over a series of timesteps, and network parameters were modified to reflect progressive fracture sealing consistent with either reaction- or transport-limited crystal growth. Results show that when fracture cementation is reaction-limited, fluid flow becomes progressively channelized into a smaller number of fractures with larger apertures. When fracture cementation is transport-limited, fluid flow experiences progressive dechannelization, becoming more homogeneously distributed throughout the fracture network. These behaviors are observed regardless of the DFN parameterization, suggesting that the effect is an intrinsic component of all fracture networks subjected to the end-member cementation mechanisms. These results have first-order implications for the spatial distribution of fluid flow in fractured rocks and recovery of permeability and strength during fault/fracture healing in the immediate aftermath of fault slip.