skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 2013656

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract Geodetic strain rate characterizes present-day crustal deformation and therefore may be used as a spatial predictor for earthquakes. However, the reported correlation between strain rates and seismicity varies significantly in different places. Here, we systematically study the correlation between strain rate, seismicity, and seismic moment in six regions representing typical plate boundary zones, diffuse plate boundary regions, and continental interiors. We quantify the strain rate–seismicity correlation using a method similar to the Molchan error diagram and area skill scores. We find that the correlation between strain rate and seismicity varies with different tectonic settings that can be characterized by the mean strain rates. Strong correlations are found in typical plate boundary zones where strain rates are high and concentrated at major fault zones, whereas poor or no correlations are found in stable continental interiors with low strain rates. The correlation between strain rate and seismicity is also time dependent: It is stronger in seismically active periods but weaker during periods of relative quiescence. These temporal variations can be useful for hazard assessment. 
    more » « less
  2. ABSTRACT Afterslip could help to reveal seismogenic fault structure. The 2020 Mw 6.3 Nima earthquake happened in a pull-apart basin within the Qiangtang block, central Tibetan plateau. Previous studies have explained the coseismic and early (<6 mo) postseismic deformation by rupture and afterslip on a normal fault bounding the western side of the basin. Here, we resolved the 19-month Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar-measured sequences of postseismic displacements that revealed a second postseismic displacement center ~12 km to the east of the main fault. Fitting the postseismic displacement requires afterslip on both the main fault and an antithetic fault that probably forms a y-shaped pair of conjugate faults in a negative flower structure. Stress-driven afterslip models suggest that the required afterslip on the antithetic fault could be triggered by coseismic rupture of the main fault or by a simultaneous rupture on the antithetic fault. The afterslip on both faults occurred mainly up-dip to the coseismic slip and has released moment ~15%–19% of that by the coseismic rupture. These results provide insights into active extension in the central Tibetan plateau and highlight the complex nature of fault rupture and afterslip. 
    more » « less