Search for: All records

Abstract While there have been efforts to supply off-grid energy in the Amazon, these attempts have focused on low upfront costs and deployment rates. These “get-energy-quick” methods have almost solely adopted diesel generators, ignoring the environmental and social risks associated with the known noise and pollution of combustion engines. Alternatively, it is recommended, herein, to supply off-grid needs with renewable, distributed microgrids comprised of photovoltaics (PV) and in-stream generators (ISG). Utilization of a hybrid combination of renewable generators can provide an energetically, environmentally, and financially feasible alternative to typical electrification methods, depending on available solar irradiation and riverine characteristics, that with community engagement allows for a participatory codesign process that takes into consideration people’s needs. A convergent solution development framework that includes designers—a team of social scientists, engineers, and communication specialists—and communities as well as the local industry is examined here, by which the future negative impacts at the human–machine–environment nexus can be minimized by iterative, continuous interaction between these key actors. 

Abstract Nations in the global South have developed hydropower projects at a rapid pace in recent decades, most notably Brazil and China. These projects have long‐documented impacts on social and ecological systems, yet the implications of hydropower for human well‐being and health are not fully understood. In this paper, we examine eight Brazilian Amazon communities in the Madeira river basin, near the Jirau and Santo Antônio dams (sample size: 536 households). We evaluate how impacts on community resources, social capital, and the experience of resettlement influence self‐rated health in these communities. Results suggest that the dams strained community resources and social capital, which were associated with reductions in self‐rated health. In particular, cognitive social capital (i.e., trust) is lower after the dams' construction. The effect of resettlement and compensation is more nuanced and qualified. This work suggests that hydropower projects have broad deleterious impacts on well‐being and health of human populations in hosting regions and that better directed efforts are required on the part of dam developers to reduce these negative outcomes. 

Analysis of TV news on how they dealt with blackouts and its relation to energy supply shortages 

Large hydropower dams and plants have been an engineering feat and a source of national pride in both the Global North and South. They were promoted as a source of clean energy almost unquestionably until the environmental awakening of the 60’s. Since then, the growing number of documented socioenvironmental impacts caused by large dams have put this energy source under scrutiny. Nevertheless, dam builders continue to promote this solution based on outdated arguments and unfulfilled promises connected to the creation of jobs, stimulation of the regional economy by the production of vast amounts of cheap electricity, improvement of local water quality and infrastructure, amongst others. Considering that most of the large dams currently planned or under construction are situated in socioenvironmentally sensitive areas, such as the Amazon, which conservation is of high importance for reaching of climate goals, this paper deconstructs myths created by dam boosters in order to reach the conclusion that large dams should not be built in the Amazon (or anywhere else).