Search for: All records

Abstract Severe, stand‐replacing wildfire substantially depletes nitrogen (N) stocks in subalpine conifer forests, potentially exacerbating N limitation of net primary productivity in many forested regions where fire frequency is increasing. In lodgepole pine (Pinus contortavar.latifolia) forests in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), long‐term data show surface soil and biomass N stocks are replenished during the first few decades following wildfire, but the source(s) of that N are unclear. We measured acetylene reduction rates in multiple cryptic niches (i.e., lichen, moss, pine litter, dead wood, and mineral soil) in 34‐year‐old lodgepole pine stands in the GYE to explore the rates, temporal patterns, and climate controls on cryptic N fixation. Acetylene reduction rates were highest in late May (0.376 nmol C₂H₄g⁻¹ h⁻¹) when moisture availability was high compared with early August and mid‐October when moisture was relatively low (0.112 and 0.002 nmol C₂H₄g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively). We observed modest rates of nitrogenase activity in a few niches following a mid‐summer rain event, suggesting that moisture is an important factor regulating field‐based N fixation rates. In a laboratory experiment, moss responded more strongly to temperature and moisture variation than all other niches. Acetylene reduction rates in dead wood increased with temperature but not moisture content. No other niches showed clear responses to either moisture or temperature manipulation. Together, the field and laboratory results suggest that frequent asynchrony between favorable temperature and moisture conditions may limit N fixation rates in the field. Overall, total annual cryptic N fixation inputs (mean: 0.26; range: 0.07–2.9 kg N ha⁻¹year⁻¹) represented <10% of the postfire biomass and surface soil N accumulation in the same stands (39.4 kg N ha⁻¹year⁻¹), pointing to a still unknown source of ecosystem N following fire. 

Abstract Changing global climate and wildfire regimes are threatening forest resilience (i.e., the ability to recover from disturbance). Yet distinguishing areas of “no” versus “slow” postfire forest recovery is challenging, and consequences of sparse tree regeneration for plant communities and carbon dynamics are uncertain. We studied previously forested areas where tree regeneration remained sparse 34 years after the large, stand‐replacing 1988 Yellowstone fires (Wyoming, USA) to ask the following questions: (1) What are the recovery pathways in areas of sparse and reduced forest recovery and how are they distributed across the landscape? (2) What explains variation in postfire tree regeneration density (total and by species) among sparse recovery pathways? (3) What are the implications of sparse recovery for understory plant communities? (4) How diminished are aboveground carbon stocks in areas of sparse postfire forest recovery? Tree densities and species‐specific age distributions, understory plant communities, and carbon stocks were sampled in 55 plots during summer 2022. We detected three qualitatively distinct sparse recovery pathways (persistent sparse or non‐forest, continuous tree infilling, and recent seedling and sapling establishment). Nearly half of the plots appeared “locked in” as persistently sparse or non‐forest, while the remaining may be on a slow path to forest recovery. Plots with nearby upwind seed sources as well as in situ seed pressure from young postfire trees appear likely to recover to forest. Where trees were sparse or absent, plant communities resembled those found in meadows, capturing compositional changes expected to become more common with continued forest loss. However, forest‐affinity species persisted in mesic locations, indicating mismatches between some plant communities and future forest change. Aboveground carbon stocks were low owing to minimal tree reestablishment. Almost all (96%) carbon was stored in coarse wood, a sharp departure from C storage patterns where forests are recovering. If not offset by future tree regeneration, decomposition of dead biomass will protract postfire aboveground carbon stock recovery. As global disturbance regimes and climate continue to change, determining the drivers of ecosystem reorganization and understanding how such changes will cascade to influence ecosystem structure and function will be increasingly important. 

In forests adapted to infrequent (> 100-year) stand-replacing fires, novel short-interval (< 30- year) fires burn young forests before they recover from previous burns. Postfire tree regeneration is reduced, plant communities shift, soils are hotter and drier, but effects on biogeochemical cycling are unresolved. We asked how postfire nitrogen (N) stocks, N availability and N fixation varied in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) forests burned at long and short intervals in Grand Teton National Park (Wyoming, USA). In 2021 and 2022, we sampled 0.25-ha plots that burned as long-interval (> 130-year) stand-replacing fire in 2000 (n = 3) or 2016 (n = 3) and nearby plots of shortinterval (16-year) fire that burned as stand-replacing fire in both years (n = 6 ‘reburns’). Five years postfire, aboveground N stocks were 31% lower in short- versus long-interval fire (77 vs. 109 kg N ha-1, respectively) and 76% lower than 21-year-old stands that did not reburn (323 kg N ha-1). However, soil total N averaged 1,072 kg N ha-1 and dominated ecosystem N stocks, which averaged 1,235 kg N ha-1 and did not vary among burn categories. Annual resinsorbed nitrate was highest in reburns and positively correlated with understory species richness and biomass. Lupinus argenteus was sparse, and asymbiotic N fixation rates were modest in all plots (< 0.1 kg N ha-1 y-1). Although ecosystem N stocks were unaffected, high-severity short-interval fire reduced and repartitioned aboveground N stocks and increased N availability. These shifts in N pools and fluxes suggest reburns can markedly alter N cycling in subalpine forests. 

Many natural disturbances have a strong climate forcing, and concern is rising about how ecosystems will respond to disturbance regimes to which they are not adapted. Novelty can arise either as attributes of the disturbance regime (e.g., frequency, severity, duration) shift beyond their historical ranges of variation or as new disturbance agents not present historically emerge. How much novelty ecological systems can absorb and whether changing disturbance regimes will lead to novel outcomes is determined by the ecological responses of communities, which are also subject to change. Powerful conceptual frameworks exist for anticipating consequences of novel disturbance regimes, but these remain challenging to apply in real-world settings. Nonlinear relationships (e.g., tipping points, feedbacks) are of particular concern because of their disproportionate effects. Future research should quantify the rise of novelty in disturbance regimes and assess the capacity of ecosystems to respond to these changes. Novel disturbance regimes will be potent catalysts for ecological change. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, Volume 54 is November 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.