Search for: All records

The formulation of Bayesian inverse problems involves choosing prior distributions; choices that seem equally reason-able may lead to significantly different conclusions. We develop a computational approach to understand the impact of the hyperparameters defining the prior on the posterior statistics of the quantities of interest. Our approach relies on global sensitivity analysis (GSA) of Bayesian inverse problems with respect to the prior hyperparameters. This, however, is a challenging problem-a naive double loop sampling approach would require running a prohibitive number of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling procedures. The present work takes a foundational step in making such a sensitivity analysis practical by combining efficient surrogate models and a tailored importance sampling approach. In particular, we can perform accurate GSA of posterior statistics of quantities of interest with respect to prior hyperparameters without the need to repeat MCMC runs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach on a simple Bayesian linear inverse problem and a nonlinear inverse problem governed by an epidemiological model. 

We consider optimal experimental design (OED) for Bayesian nonlinear inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) under model uncertainty. Specifically, we consider inverse problems in which, in addition to the inversion parameters, the governing PDEs include secondary uncertain parameters. We focus on problems with infinite-dimensional inversion and secondary parameters and present a scalable computational framework for optimal design of such problems. The proposed approach enables Bayesian inversion and OED under uncertainty within a unified framework. We build on the Bayesian approximation error (BAE) approach, to incorporate modeling uncertainties in the Bayesian inverse problem, and methods for A-optimal design of infinite-dimensional Bayesian nonlinear inverse problems. Specifically, a Gaussian approximation to the posterior at the maximuma posterioriprobability point is used to define an uncertainty aware OED objective that is tractable to evaluate and optimize. In particular, the OED objective can be computed at a cost, in the number of PDE solves, that does not grow with the dimension of the discretized inversion and secondary parameters. The OED problem is formulated as a binary bilevel PDE constrained optimization problem and a greedy algorithm, which provides a pragmatic approach, is used to find optimal designs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach for a model inverse problem governed by an elliptic PDE on a three-dimensional domain. Our computational results also highlight the pitfalls of ignoring modeling uncertainties in the OED and/or inference stages. 

We consider hyper-differential sensitivity analysis (HDSA) of nonlinear Bayesian inverse problems governed by partialdifferential equations (PDEs) with infinite-dimensional parameters. In previous works, HDSA has been used to assessthe sensitivity of the solution of deterministic inverse problems to additional model uncertainties and also different types of measurement data. In the present work, we extend HDSA to the class of Bayesian inverse problems governed by PDEs. The focus is on assessing the sensitivity of certain key quantities derived from the posterior distribution. Specifically, we focus on analyzing the sensitivity of the MAP point and the Bayes risk and make full use of the information embedded in the Bayesian inverse problem. After establishing our mathematical framework for HDSA of Bayesian inverse problems, we present a detailed computational approach for computing the proposed HDSA indices. We examine the effectiveness of the proposed approach on an inverse problem governed by a PDE modeling heat conduction.