Search for: All records

Abstract The Gulf Stream system is dominated by strong mesoscale variability that can obscure any seasonal signals in Gulf Stream strength. Nevertheless, seasonal variability of the Gulf Stream is important for local weather and climate and can influence amplification of hurricane intensity and storm tracks. We investigate seasonal variability of the speed of the Gulf Stream after it detaches from Cape Hatteras, using high‐resolution along‐track altimeter data. The altimeter data show a significant seasonal cycle in the Gulf Stream axis speed, peaking in summer. The seasonal variability in the Gulf Stream axis velocity is related to changes in the local wind stress curl and changes in the density difference across the Gulf Stream. Wind forcing affects the Gulf Stream year‐round, while changes in the density difference have the largest impact in summer. Overall, changes in the wind stress curl and upper ocean density difference across the Gulf Stream can explain roughly 40% of the seasonal Gulf Stream speed variability in summer. 

Abstract The Gulf Stream, a major ocean current in the North Atlantic ocean is a key component in the global redistribution of heat and is important for marine ecosystems. Based on 27 years (1993–2019) of wind reanalysis and satellite altimetry measurements, we present observational evidence that the path of this freely meandering jet after its separation from the continental slope at Cape Hatteras, aligns with the region of maximum cyclonic vorticity of the wind stress field known as the positive vorticity pool. This synchronicity between the wind stress curl maximum region and the Gulf Stream path is observed at multiple time-scales ranging from months to decades, spanning a distance of 1500 km between 70 and 55W. The wind stress curl in the positive vorticity pool is estimated to drive persistent upward vertical velocities ranging from 5 to 17 cm day⁻¹over its ~ 400,000 km²area; this upwelling may supply a steady source of deep nutrients to the Slope Sea region, and can explain as much as a quarter of estimated primary productivity there. 

Based on over four decades of satellite and in-situ observations, we present evidence that there are two types of cyclonic Gulf Stream eddies formed to the south of the Gulf Stream. One of these types is the well-known pinch-off rings generally formed over and to the east of the New England Seamount Chain (NESC) when a large amplitude meander trough of the Gulf Stream occludes and traps cold slope water in the eddy core. A large number of cyclonic eddies formed across the entire Gulf Stream follow a “hook-type” formation process, in which an offshore filament from the southern flank of the Gulf Stream elongates by extracting flow from the Stream, eventually acquiring cyclonic rotation and capturing Sargasso water (colder than the Gulf Stream-derived annulus) in its core. The hook-type cyclonic eddies have a distinct seasonality with formation peaking in spring, while the pinch-off rings do not show any discernible seasonal pattern. The pinch-off rings form predominantly on and east of the NESC, whereas hook-type eddies form across the entire Stream, possibly resulting from trapped and radiating instabilities and have shallower thermoclines. Shifts in the longitude of the Gulf Stream destabilization point relate to the pinch-off rings on both sides of the Stream. The shifts are not associated with the flank-generated aneurysm and hook-type eddies. The abundance of smaller and shallower aneurysm-type anticyclonic eddies to the north and the newly observed hook-type cyclonic eddies to the south suggests Gulf Stream barrier characteristics west of the NESC, while pinch-off rings appearing mostly on and east of the NESC seem to explain the blender nature of cross-stream exchange of the Gulf Stream on and east of the NESC. 

This dataset consists of weekly trajectory information of Gulf Stream Cold Eddies (CE) that existed between 2017 and 2023. The format of this Cold Eddy dataset is similar to the Warm Core Ring (WCR) Trajectory data from Porter et al. (2022, 2024) and Silver et al. (2022), and the following description is adapted from those datasets. This dataset is comprised of individual files containing each eddy’s weekly center location and its surface area for 181 CEs that existed and were tracked between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2023 (28 CEs formed in 2017; 24 formed in 2018; 25 formed in 2019; 26 formed in 2020; 35 formed in 2021; 23 formed in 2022; and 20 formed in 2023). Each Cold Eddy is identified by a unique alphanumeric code 'CEyyyymmddX', where 'CE' represents a Cold Eddy (as identified in the analysis charts); 'yyyymmdd' is the year, month and day of formation; and the last character 'X' represents the sequential sighting (formation) of the eddy in that particular year. Continuity of an eddy which passes from one year to the next is maintained by the same character in the previous year and absorbed by the initial alphabets for the next year. For example, the first eddy formed in 2021 has a trailing alphabet of 'J', which signifies that a total of nine eddies were carried over from 2020 which were still present on January 1, 2021 and were assigned the initial nine alphabets (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I). Each eddy trajectory has its own netCDF (.nc) filename following its alphanumeric code. Each file contains 4 variables every week, “Lon”- the eddy center’s longitude, “Lat”- the eddy center’s latitude, “Area” - the eddies size in km^2, and “Date” in days – which is the number of days since Jan 01, 0000. Note that in this dataset, which ended tracking all eddies up to 2023, there were six eddies that formed in 2023, and were carried over into 2024 were included with their full trajectories going into the year 2024. These eddies are: ‘CE20230515P’, ‘CE20230818U’, 'CE20230925V', 'CE20231030Y', 'CE20231103Z', and 'CE20231106a'. Findings from Jensen et al. (2024) suggest three different cyclonic eddy formation types: pinch-off cyclonic rings, hook-type cyclonic eddies, and Sargasso Sea cyclonic eddies. Pinch-off cyclonic rings form from a Gulf Stream meander trough amplifying, then encircling Slope Sea water and eventually detaching from the Gulf Stream as a cyclonic cold-core ring in the Sargasso Sea. Hook-type eddies form from a southward extending filament of the southern flank of the Gulf Stream establishing as a hook-like entity cyclonically encircling a body of Sargasso Sea water at its core. Sargasso Sea cyclonic eddies are isolated from the Gulf Stream and occur in the Sargasso Sea. A separate file is also created to help identify the cold eddy's formation type. Two files are provided here. These are: (1)  The trajectories of all Gulf Stream Cold Eddies formed from 2017 to 2023. Filename – CE_2017_2023_ncfiles.zip (2)  Information on the formation type of each Cold Eddy. Filename – CE_FormationTypes_2017to2023.doc The process of creating the CE weekly tracking dataset follows the same GIS-based methodology of the previously generated WCR census (Gangopadhyay et al., 2019, 2020). The Jenifer Clark’s Gulf Stream Charts described in Gangopadhyay et al. (2019), and continued through 2023 were used to create this dataset and were available 2-3 times a week from 2017-2023. Thus, we used approximately 840+ Charts for the 7 years of analysis. All of these charts were reanalyzed between 75°W and 55°W using QGIS 2.18.16 (2016) and geo-referenced on a WGS84 coordinate system (Decker, 1986). A single eddy trajectory is then obtained following an eddy through all of the available charts during the eddy's lifespan on a weekly basis. This process is repeated for every individual eddy.     

This dataset consists of a census of warm core ring formation locations, times, and sizes from the Gulf Stream between 2018 and 2023. This work builds upon the following dataset:   Gangopadhyay, A., Gawarkiewicz, G. (2020) Yearly census of Gulf Stream Warm Core Ring formation from 1980 to 2017. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2020-05-06 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.810182.1 [access date]   In addition, it is related to two additional datasets containing warm core ring weekly tracking data:   (i) Warm Core Ring trajectory information from 2011 to 2020 -- Silver et al. (2022a) (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6436380). (ii) Warm Core Ring Trajectories in the Northwest Atlantic Slope Sea (2021-2023) – Porter et al. (2024) (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10392322) The format of this data set is similar to the datasets mentioned above, and the following description is adapted from those. This dataset contains a yearly census of Gulf Stream Warm Core Ring formation from 2018 to 2023. This continuous census file contains the formation and demise times and locations, and the area at formation for warm core rings that lived a week or more. Each row represents a unique Warm Core Ring and is identified by a unique alphanumeric code 'WEyyyymmddA', where 'WE' represents a Warm Eddy (as identified in the analysis charts); 'yyyymmdd' is the year, month and day of formation; and the last character 'A' represents the sequential sighting of the eddies in a particular year. For example, the first ring formed in 2018, having a trailing alphabet of 'G', indicates that six rings were carried over from 2017, which are still observed on January 1, 2018.   Creating the WCR tracking dataset follows the same methodology as the previously generated WCR census (Gangopadhyay et al., 2019, 2020). This census was created from Jenifer Clark’s Gulf Stream Charts. These charts show the location, extent, and temperature signature of currents (GS, shelf-slope front), warm and cold-core rings (WCRs and CCRs), other eddies, shingles, intrusions, and other water mass boundaries in the Gulf of Maine, over Georges Bank, and in the Middle Atlantic Bight. An example chart is shown in Figure 1a of Gangopadhyay et al. (2019). A year-long animation for these charts for 2017 is presented in the supporting information of Gangopadhyay et al. (2020) https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2019JC016033. The charts are generated 2-3 times a week from 2018 to 2023. Thus, we used approximately 624+ Charts for the 6 years of analysis. These charts were then reanalyzed between 75°W and 55°W using QGIS 2.18.16 (2016) and geo-referenced on a WGS84 coordinate system (Decker, 1986).         

This dataset consists of weekly trajectory information of Gulf Stream Warm Core Rings (WCR) that existed between 2021 and 2023. This work builds upon two previous datasets: (i) Warm Core Ring trajectory information from 2000 to 2010 -- Porter et al. (2022) (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7406675) (ii) Warm Core Ring trajectory information from 2011 to 2020 -- Silver et al. (2022a) (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6436380). Combining these three datasets (previous two and this one), a total of 24 years of weekly Warm Core Ring trajectories are now available. An example of how to use such a dataset can be found in Silver et al. (2022b). The format of the dataset is similar to that of Porter et al. (2022) and Silver et al. (2022a), and the following description is adapted from those datasets. This dataset is comprised of individual files containing each ring’s weekly center location and its surface area for 81 WCRs that existed and tracked between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2023 (5 WCRs formed in 2020 and still existed in 2021; 28 formed in 2021; 30 formed in 2022; 18 formed in 2023). Each Warm Core Ring is identified by a unique alphanumeric code 'WEyyyymmddX', where 'WE' represents a Warm Eddy (as identified in the analysis charts); 'yyyymmdd' is the year, month and day of formation; and the last character 'X' represents the sequential sighting (formation) of the eddy in that particular year. Continuity of a ring which passes from one year to the next is maintained by the same character in the previous year and absorbed by the initial alphabets for the next year. For example, the first ring formed in 2022 has a trailing alphabet of 'H', which signifies that a total of seven rings were carried over from 2021 which were still present on January 1, 2022 and were assigned the initial seven alphabets (A, B, C, D, E, F and G). Each ring has its own netCDF (.nc) filename following its alphanumeric code. Each file contains 4 variables every week, “Lon”- the ring center’s longitude, “Lat”- the ring center’s latitude, “Area” - the rings size in km^2, and “Date” in days – which is the number of days since Jan 01, 0000. Five rings formed in the year 2020 that carried over into the year 2021 were included in this dataset. These rings include ‘WE20200724Q’, ‘WE20200826R’, ‘WE20200911S’, ‘WE20200930T’, and ‘WE20201111W’. The two rings that formed in 2023, and were carried over into the following year were included with their full trajectories going into the year 2024. These rings include ‘WE20231006U’ and ‘WE20231211W’. The process of creating the WCR tracking dataset follows the same methodology of the previously generated WCR census (Gangopadhyay et al., 2019, 2020). The Jenifer Clark’s Gulf Stream Charts (Gangopadhyay et al., 2019) used to create this dataset are 2-3 times a week from 2021-2023. Thus, we used approximately 360+ Charts for the 3 years of analysis. All of these charts were reanalyzed between -75° and -55°W using QGIS 2.18.16 (2016) and geo-referenced on a WGS84 coordinate system (Decker, 1986). 

Abstract We present observational evidence of a significant increase in Salinity Maximum intrusions in the Northeast US Shelf waters in the years following 2000. This increase is subsequent to and influenced by a previously observed regime-shift in the annual formation rate for Gulf Stream Warm Core Rings, which are relatively more saline than the shelf waters. Specifically, mid-depth salinity maximum intrusions, a cross-shelf exchange process, has shown a quadrupling in frequency on the shelf after the year 2000. This increase in intrusion frequency can be linked to a similar increase in Warm Core Ring occupancy footprint along the offshore edge of the shelf-break which has greatly increased the abundance of warm salty water within the Slope Sea. The increased ring occupancy footprint along the shelf follows from the near doubling in annual Warm Core Ring formation rate from the Gulf Stream. The increased occurrence of intrusions is likely driven by a combination of a larger number of rings in the slope sea and the northward shift in the GS position which may lead to more interactions between rings and the shelf topography. These results have significant implications for interpreting temporal changes in the shelf ecosystem from the standpoint of both larval recruitment as well as habitability for various important commercial species. 

{"Abstract":["This dataset contains three netcdf files that pertain to monthly, seasonal, and annual fields of surface wind stress, wind stress curl, and curl-derived upwelling velocities over the Northwest Atlantic (80-45W, 30-45N) covering a forty year period from 1980 to 2019. Six-hourly surface (10 m) wind speed components from the Japanese 55-year reanalysis (JRA-55; Kobayashi et al., 2015) were processed from 1980 to 2019 over a larger North Atlantic domain of 100W to 10E and 10N to 80N. Wind stress was computed using a modified step-wise formulation, originally based on (Gill, 1982) and a non-linear drag coefficient (Large and Pond, 1981), and later modified for low speeds (Trenberth et al., 1989). See Gifford (2023) for more details.   <\/p>\n\nAfter the six-hourly zonal and meridional wind stresses were calculated, the zonal change in meridional stress (curlx) and the negative meridional change in zonal stress (curly) were found using NumPy\u2019s gradient function in Python (Harris et al., 2020) over the larger North Atlantic domain (100W-10E, 10-80N). The curl (curlx + curly) over the study domain (80-45W, 10-80N) is then extracted, which maintain a constant order of computational accuracy in the interior and along the boundaries for the smaller domain in a centered-difference gradient calculation. <\/p>\n\nThe monthly averages of the 6-hour daily stresses and curls were then computed using the command line suite climate data operators (CDO, Schulzweida, 2022) monmean function. The seasonal (3-month average) and annual averages (12-month average) were calculated in Python using the monthly fields with NumPy (NumPy, Harris et al., 2020). <\/p>\n\nCorresponding upwelling velocities at different time-scales were obtained from the respective curl fields and zonal wind stress by using the Ekman pumping equation of the study by Risien and Chelton (2008; page 2393). Please see Gifford (2023) for more details.   <\/p>\n\nThe files each contain nine variables that include longitude, latitude, time, zonal wind stress, meridional wind stress, zonal change in meridional wind stress (curlx), the negative meridional change in zonal wind stress (curly), total curl, and upwelling. Units of time begin in 1980 and are months, seasons (JFM etc.), and years to 2019. The longitude variable extends from 80W to 45W and latitude is 30N to 45N with uniform 1.25 degree resolution.  <\/p>\n\nUnits of stress are in Pascals, units of curl are in Pascals per meter, and upwelling velocity is described by centimeters per day. The spatial grid is a 29 x 13 longitude x latitude array. <\/p>\n\nFilenames: <\/p>\n\nmonthly_windstress_wsc_upwelling.nc<\/strong>: 480 time steps from 80W to 45W and 30N to 45N.<\/p>\n\nseasonal_windstress_wsc_upwelling.nc<\/strong>: 160 time steps from 80W to 45W and 30N to 45N.<\/p>\n\nannual_windstress_wsc_upwelling.nc<\/strong>: 40 time steps from 80W to 45W and 30N to 45N.<\/p>"],"Other":["Please contact igifford@earth.miami.edu for any queries.","{"references": ["Gifford, I.H., 2023. The Synchronicity of the Gulf Stream Free Jet and the Wind Induced Cyclonic Vorticity Pool. MS Thesis, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. 75pp.", "Gill, A. E. (1982). Atmosphere-ocean dynamics (Vol. 30). Academic Press.", "Harris, C.R., Millman, K.J., van der Walt, S.J. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357\\u2013362 (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2.", "Japan Meteorological Agency/Japan (2013), JRA-55: Japanese 55-year Reanalysis, Daily 3-Hourly and 6-Hourly Data, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6HH6H41, Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, Boulder, Colo. (Updated monthly.)", "Kobayashi, S., Ota, Y., Harada, Y., Ebita, A., Moriya, M., Onoda, H., Onogi, K., Kamahori, H., Kobayashi, C., Endo, H. and Miyaoka, K., 2015. The JRA-55 reanalysis: General specifications and basic characteristics.\\u202fJournal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II,\\u202f93(1), pp.5-48.", "Large, W.G. and Pond, S., 1981. Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds.\\u202fJournal of physical oceanography,\\u202f11(3), pp.324-336.", "Risien, C.M. and Chelton, D.B., 2008. A global climatology of surface wind and wind stress fields from eight years of QuikSCAT scatterometer data.\\u202fJournal of Physical Oceanography,\\u202f38(11), pp.2379-2413.", "Schulzweida, Uwe. (2022). CDO User Guide (2.1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7112925.", "Trenberth, K.E., Large, W.G. and Olson, J.G., 1989. The effective drag coefficient for evaluating wind stress over the oceans.\\u202fJournal of Climate,\\u202f2(12), pp.1507-1516."]}"]}