Search for: All records

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are ubiquitous in everyday applications. However, Lithium (Li) is a limited resource on the planet and, therefore, not sustainable. As an alternative to lithium, earth-abundant and cheaper multivalent metals such as aluminum (Al) and calcium (Ca) have been actively researched in battery systems. However, finding suitable intercalation hosts for multivalent-ion batteries is urgently needed. Open-tunneled oxides represent a specific category of microparticles distinguished by the presence of integrated one-dimensional channels or nanopores. This work focuses on two promising open-tunnel oxides: Niobium Tungsten Oxide (NTO) and Molybdenum Vanadium Oxide (MoVO). The MoVO structure can accommodate a larger number of multivalent ions than NTO due to its larger surface area and different shapes. Specifically, the MoVO structure can adsorb Ca, Li, and Al ions with adsorption potentials ranging from around 4 to 5 eV. However, the adsorption potential for hexagonal channels of Al ion drops to 1.73 eV due to the limited channel area. The NTO structure exhibits an insertion/adsorption potential of 4.4 eV, 3.4 eV, and 0.9 eV for one Li, Ca, and Al, respectively. Generally, Ca ions are more readily adsorbed than Al ions in both MoVO and NTO structures. Bader charge analysis and charge density plots reveal the role of charge transfer and ion size in the insertion of multivalent ions such as Ca and Al into MoVO and NTO systems. Exploring open-tunnel oxide materials for battery applications is hindered by vast compositional possibilities. The execution of experimental trials and quantum-based simulations is not viable for addressing the challenge of locating a specific item within a large and complex set of possibilities. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct structural stability testing to identify viable combinations with sufficient pore topologies. Data mining and machine learning techniques are employed to discover innovative transitional metal oxide materials. This study compares two machine learning algorithms, one utilizing descriptors and the other employing graphs to predict the synthesizability of new materials inside a laboratory setting. The outcomes of this study offer valuable insights into the exploration of alternative naturally occurring multiscale particles. 

Although lithium-ion batteries represent the best available rechargeable battery technology, a significant energy and power density gap exists between LIBs and petrol/gasoline. The battery electrodes comprise a mixture of active materials particles, conductive carbon, and binder additives deposited onto a current collector. Although this basic design has persisted for decades, the active material particle’s desired size scale is debated. Traditionally, microparticles have been used in batteries. Advances in nanotechnology have spurred interest in deploying nanoparticles as active materials. However, despite many efforts in nano, industries still primarily use ‘old’ microparticles. Most importantly, the battery industry is unlikely to replace microstructures with nanometer-sized analogs. This poses an important question: Is there a place for nanostructure in battery design due to irreplaceable microstructure? The way forward lies in multiscale active materials, microscale structures with built-in nanoscale features, such as microparticles assembled from nanoscale building blocks or patterned with engineered or natural nanopores. Although experimental strides have been made in developing such materials, computational progress in this domain remains limited and, in some cases, negligible. However, the fields hold immense computational potential, presenting a multitude of opportunities. This perspective highlights the existing gaps in modeling multiscale active materials and delineates various open challenges in the realm of electro-chemo-mechanical modeling. By doing so, it aims to inspire computational research within this field and promote synergistic collaborative efforts between computational and experimental researchers.