Search for: All records

Abstract Streamflow droughts are receiving increased attention worldwide due to their impact on the environment and economy. One region of concern is the Midwestern United States, whose agricultural productivity depends on subsurface pipes known as tile drains to improve trafficability and soil conditions for crop growth. Tile drains accomplish this by rapidly transporting surplus soil moisture and shallow groundwater from fields, resulting in reduced watershed storage. However, no work has previously examined the connection between tile drainage and streamflow drought. Here, we pose the question: does the extent of watershed-level tile drainage lead to an increased susceptibly and magnitude of streamflow droughts? To answer this, we use daily streamflow data for 122 watersheds throughout the Midwestern United States to quantify streamflow drought duration, frequency, and intensity. Using spatial multiple regression models, we find that agricultural tile drainage generates statistically significant (p< 0.05) increases in streamflow drought duration and intensity while significantly reducing drought frequency. The magnitude of the effect of tile drainage on streamflow drought characteristics is similar to that of water table depth and precipitation seasonality, both of which are known to influence streamflow droughts. Furthermore, projected changes in regional precipitation characteristics will likely drive the installation of additional tile drainage. We find that for each 10% increase in tile-drained watershed area, streamflow drought duration and intensity increase by 0.03 d and 12%, respectively, while frequency decreases by 0.10 events/year. Such increases in tile drainage may lead to more severe streamflow droughts and have a detrimental effect on the socio-environmental usage of streams throughout the Midwest. 

Abstract The Midwest of the USA is a highly productive agricultural region, in part due to the installation of perforated subsurface pipes, known as tile drains that remove excess water from wet soils. Tile drains rapidly move water to nearby streams, influencing how quickly streamflow rises and falls (i.e., streamflow “flashiness”). Currently, there are no comprehensive studies that compare the extent to which tile drainage influences flashiness across large and diverse agricultural regions. We address this knowledge gap by examining growing‐season (April–October) flashiness using the Richards‐Baker Index (RBI) in 139 watersheds located throughout the Midwest. Using a spatial tile‐drainage dataset, watersheds were split into low, medium, and high tile‐drainage classes. We found no significant differences between the flashiness of these three classes using a one‐way Kruskal–Wallis test. When watersheds were separated into infiltration groups to help control for different soil types, the high tile‐drainage class RBI was significantly higher than the low tile‐drainage class RBI in the high infiltration group. To further understand the causes of flashiness, additional environmental variables and their relationship to flashiness were examined using multivariate regression. In the low infiltration group, tile drainage significantly reduced flashiness, with watershed area and average depth to water table being the largest influences on flashiness. Tile drainage produced a larger reduction in flashiness in the high infiltration watersheds, with the largest influences being percent clay in the watershed and watershed area. These results indicate that the influence of tile drainage on flashiness emerges only after other watershed variables are accounted for. Given that tile drainage may increase in the future as precipitation patterns and extremes change, flashiness will likely continue to be modified. These results lead to an improved understanding of flood‐generating and nutrient transport mechanisms that are relevant to stakeholders across a wide range of sectors.