An official website of the United States government
Abstract Streamflow droughts are receiving increased attention worldwide due to their impact on the environment and economy. One region of concern is the Midwestern United States, whose agricultural productivity depends on subsurface pipes known as tile drains to improve trafficability and soil conditions for crop growth. Tile drains accomplish this by rapidly transporting surplus soil moisture and shallow groundwater from fields, resulting in reduced watershed storage. However, no work has previously examined the connection between tile drainage and streamflow drought. Here, we pose the question: does the extent of watershed-level tile drainage lead to an increased susceptibly and magnitude of streamflow droughts? To answer this, we use daily streamflow data for 122 watersheds throughout the Midwestern United States to quantify streamflow drought duration, frequency, and intensity. Using spatial multiple regression models, we find that agricultural tile drainage generates statistically significant (p< 0.05) increases in streamflow drought duration and intensity while significantly reducing drought frequency. The magnitude of the effect of tile drainage on streamflow drought characteristics is similar to that of water table depth and precipitation seasonality, both of which are known to influence streamflow droughts. Furthermore, projected changes in regional precipitation characteristics will likely drive the installation of additional tile drainage. We find that for each 10% increase in tile-drained watershed area, streamflow drought duration and intensity increase by 0.03 d and 12%, respectively, while frequency decreases by 0.10 events/year. Such increases in tile drainage may lead to more severe streamflow droughts and have a detrimental effect on the socio-environmental usage of streams throughout the Midwest.
more »
« less
Tile drainage as a driver of streamflow flashiness in agricultural areas of the Midwest , USA
Abstract The Midwest of the USA is a highly productive agricultural region, in part due to the installation of perforated subsurface pipes, known as tile drains that remove excess water from wet soils. Tile drains rapidly move water to nearby streams, influencing how quickly streamflow rises and falls (i.e., streamflow “flashiness”). Currently, there are no comprehensive studies that compare the extent to which tile drainage influences flashiness across large and diverse agricultural regions. We address this knowledge gap by examining growing‐season (April–October) flashiness using the Richards‐Baker Index (RBI) in 139 watersheds located throughout the Midwest. Using a spatial tile‐drainage dataset, watersheds were split into low, medium, and high tile‐drainage classes. We found no significant differences between the flashiness of these three classes using a one‐way Kruskal–Wallis test. When watersheds were separated into infiltration groups to help control for different soil types, the high tile‐drainage class RBI was significantly higher than the low tile‐drainage class RBI in the high infiltration group. To further understand the causes of flashiness, additional environmental variables and their relationship to flashiness were examined using multivariate regression. In the low infiltration group, tile drainage significantly reduced flashiness, with watershed area and average depth to water table being the largest influences on flashiness. Tile drainage produced a larger reduction in flashiness in the high infiltration watersheds, with the largest influences being percent clay in the watershed and watershed area. These results indicate that the influence of tile drainage on flashiness emerges only after other watershed variables are accounted for. Given that tile drainage may increase in the future as precipitation patterns and extremes change, flashiness will likely continue to be modified. These results lead to an improved understanding of flood‐generating and nutrient transport mechanisms that are relevant to stakeholders across a wide range of sectors.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2227356
- PAR ID:
- 10472187
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Hydrological Processes
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 0885-6087
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Complete transformations of land cover from prairie, wetlands, and hardwood forests to row crop agriculture and urban centers are thought to have caused profound changes in hydrology in the Upper Midwestern US since the 1800s. In this study, we investigate four large (23 000–69 000 km2) Midwest river basins that span climate and land use gradients to understand how climate and agricultural drainage have influenced basin hydrology over the last 79 years. We use daily, monthly, and annual flow metrics to document streamflow changes and discuss those changes in the context of precipitation and land use changes. Since 1935, flow, precipitation, artificial drainage extent, and corn and soybean acreage have increased across the region. In extensively drained basins, we observe 2 to 4 fold increases in low flows and 1.5 to 3 fold increases in high and extreme flows. Using a water budget, we determined that the storage term has decreased in intensively drained and cultivated basins by 30–200 % since 1975, but increased by roughly 30 % in the less agricultural basin. Storage has generally decreased during spring and summer months and increased during fall and winter months in all watersheds. Thus, the loss of storage and enhanced hydrologic connectivity and efficiency imparted by artificial agricultural drainage appear to have amplified the streamflow response to precipitation increases in the Midwest. Future increases in precipitation are likely to further intensify drainage practices and increase streamflows. Increased streamflow has implications for flood risk, channel adjustment, and sediment and nutrient transport and presents unique challenges for agriculture and water resource management in the Midwest. Better documentation of existing and future drain tile and ditch installation is needed to further understand the role of climate versus drainage across multiple spatial and temporal scales.more » « less
-
Abstract Tile drainage is one of the dominant agricultural management practices in the United States and has greatly expanded since the late 1990s. It has proven effects on land surface water balance and quantity and quality of streamflow at the local scale. The effect of tile drainage on crop production, hydrology, and the environment on a regional scale is elusive due to lack of high-resolution, spatially-explicit tile drainage area information for the Contiguous United States (CONUS). We developed a 30-m resolution tile drainage map of the most-likely tile-drained area of the CONUS (AgTile-US) from county-level tile drainage census using a geospatial model that uses soil drainage information and topographic slope as inputs. Validation of AgTile-US with 16000 ground truth points indicated 86.03% accuracy at the CONUS-scale. Over the heavily tile-drained midwestern regions of the U.S., the accuracy ranges from 82.7% to 93.6%. These data can be used to study and model the hydrologic and water quality responses of tile drainage and to enhance streamflow forecasting in tile drainage dominant regions.more » « less
-
Abstract Quantifying nitrate leaching in agricultural fields is often complicated by inability to capture all water draining through a specific area. We designed and tested undisturbed soil monoliths (termed “soil block mesocosms”) to achieve complete collection of drainage. Each mesocosm measures 1.5 m × 1.5 m × 1.2 m and is enclosed by steel on the sides and bottom with a single outlet to collect drainage. We compared measurements from replicate mesocosms planted to corn (Zea maysL.) with a nearby field experiment with tile‐drained plots (“drainage plots”), and with drainage from nearby watersheds from 2020 through 2022 under drought conditions. Annual mesocosm drainage volumes were 6.5–24.6 cm greater than from the drainage plots, likely because the mesocosms were isolated from the subsoil and could not store groundwater below the drain depth, whereas the drainage plots accumulated infiltration as groundwater. Thus, we obtained consistent nitrate leaching measurements from the mesocosms even when some drainage plots yielded no water. Despite drainage volume differences, mean flow‐weighted nitrate concentrations were similar between mesocosms and drainage plots in 2 of 3 years. Mesocosm annual drainage volume was 8.7 cm lower to 16.7 cm higher than watershed drainage, likely due to lagged influences of groundwater. Corn yields were lower in mesocosms than drainage plots in 2020, but with irrigation, yields were similar in subsequent years. Mean 2020 surface soil moisture and temperature were similar between the mesocosms and nearby fields. Based on these comparisons, the mesocosms provide a robust method to measure nitrate leaching with lower variability than field plots.more » « less
-
Abstract The Logan River watershed, located in Northern Utah, USA, consists of a relatively pristine, mountainous area that drains to a lower elevation, valley area influenced by both urban development and agriculture. The Logan River Observatory has been collecting aquatic (streamflow and water quality) and climate data throughout the Logan River watershed since 2014. While streamflow measurements are commonly made at the outlets of research watersheds, the Logan River watershed consists of diverse hydrologic, topographic, and geologic settings that require a detailed understanding of streamflow variability over time at many locations. Here, we illustrate: (a) the importance of collecting streamflow time series throughout complex watersheds, and (b) how simple flow balances can provide much needed hydrologic insight into the locations and timing of gains and losses over reaches to guide future investigations.more » « less
