skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 2314532

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of available paleomagnetic studies and datasets from northern Alaska, USA, and Yukon, Canada. Most studies in this region were conducted when our understanding of best-practices paleomagnetism was still developing; as a result, many do not meet modern standards of data quality and many interpretations of the paleomagnetic data—though valid at the time—are now also outdated. In this review, we assess what data are reliable, what interpretations have stood the test of time, and what the existing data can constrain about the tectonic history of this region. We find that although a middle to Late Cretaceous (Aptian–Turonian) overprint pervades much of this area, many sites still retain primary remanence directions, some dating as far back as the Neoproterozoic. Studies that found complete overprinting in the Cretaceous also typically analyzed poor lithologic recorders of paleomagnetic directions, such as carbonates. Based on our assessment of the most reliable data from the study region, relative motion between the examined outboard terranes and Laurentia was not yet complete by the early Late Cretaceous. We also find that “high latitude” dinosaur fossil sites were more northerly than today, confirming previous assumptions about the paleolatitudes at these sites. Finally, we discuss how the widely cited Jurassic–Cretaceous counterclockwise rotation hypothesis for the Arctic Alaska terrane is no longer supported by the existing paleomagnetic data, and the validity of this hypothesis should be critically re-examined. 
    more » « less