Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract The challenges of monitoring wildlife often limit the scales and intensity of the data that can be collected. New technologies—such as remote sensing using unoccupied aircraft systems (UASs)—can collect information more quickly, over larger areas, and more frequently than is feasible using ground‐based methods. While airborne imaging is increasingly used to produce data on the location and counts of individuals, its ability to produce individual‐based demographic information is less explored. Repeat airborne imagery to generate an imagery time series provides the potential to track individuals over time to collect information beyond one‐off counts, but doing so necessitates automated approaches to handle the resulting high‐frequency large‐spatial scale imagery. We developed an automated time‐series remote sensing approach to identifying wading bird nests in the Everglades ecosystem of Florida, USA to explore the feasibility and challenges of conducting time‐series based remote sensing on mobile animals at large spatial scales. We combine a computer vision model for detecting birds in weekly UAS imagery of colonies with biology‐informed algorithmic rules to generate an automated approach that identifies likely nests. Comparing the performance of these automated approaches to human review of the same imagery shows that our primary approach identifies nests with comparable performance to human review, and that a secondary approach designed to find quick‐fail nests resulted in high false‐positive rates. We also assessed the ability of both human review and our primary algorithm to find ground‐verified nests in UAS imagery and again found comparable performance, with the exception of nests that fail quickly. Our results showed that automating nest detection, a key first step toward estimating nest success, is possible in complex environments like the Everglades and we discuss a number of challenges and possible uses for these types of approaches.more » « less
-
The wader package provides functions to download and generate summaries for the count, nesting, indicator, and weather data from the Wading Bird Project. The Wading Bird Project is a long-term (and ongoing) monitoring site in the Everglades water conservation areas. The raw data files can be found at https://github.com/weecology/evergladeswadingbird.more » « less
-
Wildlife population monitoring over large geographic areas is increasingly feasible due to developments in aerial survey methods coupled with the use of computer vision models for identifying and classifying individual organisms. However, aerial surveys still occur infrequently, and there are often long delays between the acquisition of airborne imagery and its conversion into population monitoring data. Near real‐time monitoring is increasingly important for active management decisions and ecological forecasting. Accomplishing this over large scales requires a combination of airborne imagery, computer vision models to process imagery into information on individual organisms, and automated workflows to ensure that imagery is quickly processed into data following acquisition. Here we present our end‐to‐end workflow for conducting near real‐time monitoring of wading birds in the Everglades, Florida, USA. Imagery is acquired as frequently as weekly using uncrewed aircraft systems (aka drones), processed into orthomosaics (using Agisoft metashape), converted into individual‐level species data using a Retinanet‐50 object detector, post‐processed, archived, and presented on a web‐based visualization platform (using Shiny). The main components of the workflow are automated using Snakemake. The underlying computer vision model provides accurate object detection, species classification, and both total and species‐level counts for five out of six target species (White Ibis, Great Egret, Great Blue Heron, Wood Stork, and Roseate Spoonbill). The model performed poorly for Snowy Egrets due to the small number of labels and difficulty distinguishing them from White Ibis (the most abundant species). By automating the post‐survey processing, data on the populations of these species is available in near real‐time (<1 week from the date of the survey) providing information at the time scales needed for ecological forecasting and active management.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
