Search for: All records

A Matching Vector (MV) family modulo a positive integer m ≥ 2 is a pair of ordered lists U = (u_1, ⋯, u_K) and V = (v_1, ⋯, v_K) where u_i, v_j ∈ ℤ_m^n with the following property: for any i ∈ [K], the inner product ⟨u_i, v_i⟩ = 0 mod m, and for any i ≠ j, ⟨u_i, v_j⟩ ≠ 0 mod m. An MV family is called r-restricted if inner products ⟨u_i, v_j⟩, for all i,j, take at most r different values. The r-restricted MV families are extremely important since the only known construction of constant-query subexponential locally decodable codes (LDCs) are based on them. Such LDCs constructed via matching vector families are called matching vector codes. Let MV(m,n) (respectively MV(m, n, r)) denote the largest K such that there exists an MV family (respectively r-restricted MV family) of size K in ℤ_m^n. Such a MV family can be transformed in a black-box manner to a good r-query locally decodable code taking messages of length K to codewords of length N = m^n. For small prime m, an almost tight bound MV(m,n) ≤ O(m^{n/2}) was first shown by Dvir, Gopalan, Yekhanin (FOCS'10, SICOMP'11), while for general m, the same paper established an upper bound of O(m^{n-1+o_m(1)}), with o_m(1) denoting a function that goes to zero when m grows. For any arbitrary constant r ≥ 3 and composite m, the best upper bound till date on MV(m,n,r) is O(m^{n/2}), is due to Bhowmick, Dvir and Lovett (STOC'13, SICOMP'14).In a breakthrough work, Alrabiah, Guruswami, Kothari and Manohar (STOC'23) implicitly improve this bound for 3-restricted families to MV(m, n, 3) ≤ O(m^{n/3}). In this work, we present an upper bound for r = 3 where MV(m,n,3) ≤ m^{n/6 +O(log n)}, and as a result, any 3-query matching vector code must have codeword length of N ≥ K^{6-o(1)}. 

We study the problem of function inversion with preprocessing where, given a function f : [N] → [N] and a point y in its image, the goal is to find an x such that f(x) = y using at most T oracle queries to f and S bits of preprocessed advice that depend on f. The seminal work of Corrigan-Gibbs and Kogan [TCC 2019] initiated a line of research that shows many exciting connections between the non-adaptive setting of this problem and other areas of theoretical computer science. Specifically, they introduced a very weak class of algorithms (strongly non-adaptive) where the points queried by the oracle depend only on the inversion point y, and are independent of the answers to the previous queries and the S bits of advice. They showed that proving even mild lower bounds on strongly non-adaptive algorithms for function inversion would imply a breakthrough result in circuit complexity. We prove that every strongly non-adaptive algorithm for function inversion (and even for its special case of permutation inversion) must have ST = Ω(N log (N) log (T)). This gives the first improvement to the long-standing lower bound of ST = Ω(N log N) due to Yao [STOC 90]. As a corollary, we conclude the first separation between strongly non-adaptive and adaptive algorithms for permutation inversion, where the adaptive algorithm by Hellman [TOIT 80] achieves the trade-off ST = O(N log N). Additionally, we show equivalence between lower bounds for strongly non-adaptive data structures and the one-way communication complexity of certain partial functions. As an example, we recover our lower bound on function inversion in the communication complexity framework. 

For S ⊆ 𝔽ⁿ, consider the linear space of restrictions of degree-d polynomials to S. The Hilbert function of S, denoted h_S(d,𝔽), is the dimension of this space. We obtain a tight lower bound on the smallest value of the Hilbert function of subsets S of arbitrary finite grids in 𝔽ⁿ with a fixed size |S|. We achieve this by proving that this value coincides with a combinatorial quantity, namely the smallest number of low Hamming weight points in a down-closed set of size |S|. Understanding the smallest values of Hilbert functions is closely related to the study of degree-d closure of sets, a notion introduced by Nie and Wang (Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 2015). We use bounds on the Hilbert function to obtain a tight bound on the size of degree-d closures of subsets of 𝔽_qⁿ, which answers a question posed by Doron, Ta-Shma, and Tell (Computational Complexity, 2022). We use the bounds on the Hilbert function and degree-d closure of sets to prove that a random low-degree polynomial is an extractor for samplable randomness sources. Most notably, we prove the existence of low-degree extractors and dispersers for sources generated by constant-degree polynomials and polynomial-size circuits. Until recently, even the existence of arbitrary deterministic extractors for such sources was not known. 

We study the Matrix Multiplication Verification Problem (MMV) where the goal is, given three n × n matrices A, B, and C as input, to decide whether AB = C. A classic randomized algorithm by Freivalds (MFCS, 1979) solves MMV in Õ(n²) time, and a longstanding challenge is to (partially) derandomize it while still running in faster than matrix multiplication time (i.e., in o(n^ω) time). To that end, we give two algorithms for MMV in the case where AB - C is sparse. Specifically, when AB - C has at most O(n^δ) non-zero entries for a constant 0 ≤ δ < 2, we give (1) a deterministic O(n^(ω-ε))-time algorithm for constant ε = ε(δ) > 0, and (2) a randomized Õ(n²)-time algorithm using δ/2 ⋅ log₂ n + O(1) random bits. The former algorithm is faster than the deterministic algorithm of Künnemann (ESA, 2018) when δ ≥ 1.056, and the latter algorithm uses fewer random bits than the algorithm of Kimbrel and Sinha (IPL, 1993), which runs in the same time and uses log₂ n + O(1) random bits (in turn fewer than Freivalds’s algorithm). Our algorithms are simple and use techniques from coding theory. Let H be a parity-check matrix of a Maximum Distance Separable (MDS) code, and let G = (I | G') be a generator matrix of a (possibly different) MDS code in systematic form. Our deterministic algorithm uses fast rectangular matrix multiplication to check whether HAB = HC and H(AB)^T = H(C^T), and our randomized algorithm samples a uniformly random row g' from G' and checks whether g'AB = g'C and g'(AB)^T = g'C^T. We additionally study the complexity of MMV. We first show that all algorithms in a natural class of deterministic linear algebraic algorithms for MMV (including ours) require Ω(n^ω) time. We also show a barrier to proving a super-quadratic running time lower bound for matrix multiplication (and hence MMV) under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). Finally, we study relationships between natural variants and special cases of MMV (with respect to deterministic Õ(n²)-time reductions).