Search for: All records

ABSTRACT The unadjusted Langevin algorithm is commonly used to sample probability distributions in extremely high‐dimensional settings. However, existing analyses of the algorithm for strongly log‐concave distributions suggest that, as the dimension of the problem increases, the number of iterations required to ensure convergence within a desired error in the metric scales in proportion to or . In this paper, we argue that, despite this poor scaling of the error for the full set of variables, the behavior for asmall numberof variables can be significantly better: A number of iterations proportional to , up to logarithmic terms in , often suffices for the algorithm to converge to within a desired error for all ‐marginals. We refer to this effect asdelocalization of bias. We show that the delocalization effect does not hold universally and prove its validity for Gaussian distributions and strongly log‐concave distributions with certain sparse interactions. Our analysis relies on a novel metric to measure convergence. A key technical challenge we address is the lack of a one‐step contraction property in this metric. Finally, we use asymptotic arguments to explore potential generalizations of the delocalization effect beyond the Gaussian and sparse interactions setting.