Search for: All records

Middle school students learned about astronomy and STEM concepts while exploring Minecraft simulations of hypothetical Earths and exoplanets. Small groups (n = 24) were tasked with building feasible habitats on Mars. In this paper, we present a scoring scheme for habitat assessment that was used to build novel multi/mixed-input AI models. Using Spearman’s rank correlations, we found that our scoring scheme was reliable with regards to team size and face-to-face instruction time and validated with self-explanation scores. We took an exploratory approach to analyzing image and block data to compare seven different input conditions. Using one-way ANOVAs, we found that the means of the conditions were not equal for accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 metrics. A post hoc Tukey HSD test found that models built using images only were statistically significantly worse than conditions that used block data on the metrics. We also report the results of optimized models using block only data on additional Mars bases (n = 57). 

This work investigates how tutoring discourse interacts with students’ proximal knowledge to explain and predict students’ learning outcomes. Our work is conducted in the context of high-dosage human tutoring where 9th-grade students attended small group tutorials and individually practiced problems on an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS). We analyzed whether tutors’ talk moves and students’ performance on the ITS predicted scores on math learning assessments. We trained Random Forest Classifiers (RFCs) to distinguish high and low assessment scores based on tutor talk moves, student’s ITS performance metrics, and their combination. A decision tree was extracted from each RFC to yield an interpretable model. We found AUCs of 0.63 for talk moves, 0.66 for ITS, and 0.77 for their combination, suggesting interactivity among the two feature sources. Specifically, the best decision tree emerged from combining the tutor talk moves that encouraged rigorous thinking and students’ ITS mastery. In essence, tutor talk that encouraged mathematical reasoning predicted achievement for students who demonstrated high mastery on the ITS, whereas tutors’ revoicing of students’ mathematical ideas and contributions was predictive for students with low ITS mastery. Implications for practice are discussed.