Search for: All records

This original research article focuses on the investigation of the use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) use among students in communication-intensive STEM courses and how this engagement shapes their scientific communication practices, competencies, confidence, and science identity. Using a mixed-methods approach, patterns were identified in how students perceived their current science identity and use of incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into writing, oral, and technical tasks. Thematic analysis reveals that students use AI for a range of STEM communication endeavors such as structuring lab reports, brainstorming presentation ideas, and verifying code. While many minoritized students explicitly describe AI as a confidence-boosting, timesaving, and competence-enhancing tool, others—particularly those from privileged backgrounds—downplay its influence, despite evidence of its significant role in their science identity. These results suggest the reframing of science identity as being shaped by technological usage and social contingency. This research illuminates both the potential and pitfalls of AI-use in shaping the next generation of scientists. 

ABSTRACT Scientific publications, textbooks, and online educational resources rely on illustrated figures to communicate about molecular structures like genes and chromosomes. Published figures have the potential to shape how learners think about these molecular structures and their functions, so it is important that figures are clear, unambiguous, and free from misleading or incorrect information. Unfortunately, we found numerous examples of figures that contain representations of genes and chromosomes with errors that reflect common molecular biology misconceptions. We found published figures featuring Y-shaped Y chromosomes, replicated chromosomes incorrectly shown with different alleles on sister chromatids, single genes portrayed as wide bands on chromosomes, and genes consisting of only a small number of nucleotides. Drawing on our research on student thinking about visual representations in molecular biology, we critique these published figures that contain such misconceptions and provide recommendations for simple modifications to figures that may help scientists, science illustrators, and science educators more accurately communicate the structure and function of genes and chromosomes. 

ABSTRACT New approaches to microbiology education are needed to ensure equitable representation in microbiology and to build literacy in microbiology and science broadly. To address this goal, we developed a course held at the collegiate level that uniquely integrated microbiology, Indigenous studies, science and technology studies, and arts and performance. The course participants included students in 12 majors across science, engineering, humanities, and arts. The different disciplines of the course intersected around Inuit fermented foods as the basis for discussions on fundamental microbiological principles, the scientific method, food sovereignty, and Indigenous peoples’ rights. A diverse array of activities was included, ranging from lectures in microbiology and fermentation, a sauerkraut-making lab, a walk through the Native American contemplative garden, a workshop on Inuit drum making and dance, as well as a performance by Inuit-soul group Pamyua. We propose that a radically interdisciplinary approach and a human rights framework in microbiology education can be a way to enhance microbiology and science literacy for a diverse group of students.