 Award ID(s):
 1650733
 Publication Date:
 NSFPAR ID:
 10026353
 Journal Name:
 Proceedings of the annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
 ISSN:
 07378017
 Sponsoring Org:
 National Science Foundation
More Like this

This paper focuses on showing timemessage tradeoffs in distributed algorithms for fundamental problems such as leader election, broadcast, spanning tree (ST), minimum spanning tree (MST), minimum cut, and many graph verification problems. We consider the synchronous CONGEST distributed computing model and assume that each node has initial knowledge of itself and the identifiers of its neighbors  the socalled KT_1 model  a wellstudied model that also naturally arises in many applications. Recently, it has been established that one can obtain (almost) singularly optimal algorithms, i.e., algorithms that have simultaneously optimal time and message complexity (up to polylogarithmic factors), for many fundamental problems in the standard KT_0 model (where nodes have only local knowledge of themselves and not their neighbors). The situation is less clear in the KT_1 model. In this paper, we present several new distributed algorithms in the KT_1 model that trade off between time and message complexity. Our distributed algorithms are based on a uniform and general approach which involves constructing a sparsified spanning subgraph of the original graph  called a danner  that trades off the number of edges with the diameter of the sparsifier. In particular, a key ingredient of our approach is amore »

We present an $\tilde O(m+n^{1.5})$time randomized algorithm for maximum cardinality bipartite matching and related problems (e.g. transshipment, negativeweight shortest paths, and optimal transport) on $m$edge, $n$node graphs. For maximum cardinality bipartite matching on moderately dense graphs, i.e. $m = \Omega(n^{1.5})$, our algorithm runs in time nearly linear in the input size and constitutes the first improvement over the classic $O(m\sqrt{n})$time [Dinic 1970; HopcroftKarp 1971; Karzanov 1973] and $\tilde O(n^\omega)$time algorithms [IbarraMoran 1981] (where currently $\omega\approx 2.373$). On sparser graphs, i.e. when $m = n^{9/8 + \delta}$ for any constant $\delta>0$, our result improves upon the recent advances of [Madry 2013] and [LiuSidford 2020b, 2020a] which achieve an $\tilde O(m^{4/3+o(1)})$ runtime. We obtain these results by combining and advancing recent lines of research in interior point methods (IPMs) and dynamic graph algorithms. First, we simplify and improve the IPM of [v.d.BrandLeeSidfordSong 2020], providing a general primaldual IPM framework and new samplingbased techniques for handling infeasibility induced by approximate linear system solvers. Second, we provide a simple sublineartime algorithm for detecting and sampling highenergy edges in electric flows on expanders and show that when combined with recent advances in dynamic expander decompositions, this yields efficient data structures for maintaining the iterates ofmore »

We present a general framework of designing efficient dynamic approximate algorithms for optimization on undirected graphs. In particular, we develop a technique that, given any problem that admits a certain notion of vertex sparsifiers, gives data structures that maintain approximate solutions in sublinear update and query time. We illustrate the applicability of our paradigm to the following problems. (1) A fullydynamic algorithm that approximates allpair maximumflows/minimumcuts up to a nearly logarithmic factor in $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})$ amortized time against an oblivious adversary, and $\tilde{O}(m^{3/4})$ time against an adaptive adversary. (2) An incremental data structure that maintains $O(1)$approximate shortest path in $n^{o(1)}$ time per operation, as well as fully dynamic approximate allpair shortest path and transshipment in $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3+o(1)})$ amortized time per operation. (3) A fullydynamic algorithm that approximates allpair effective resistance up to an $(1+\eps)$ factor in $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3+o(1)} \epsilon^{O(1)})$ amortized update time per operation. The key tool behind result (1) is the dynamic maintenance of an algorithmic construction due to Madry [FOCS' 10], which partitions a graph into a collection of simpler graph structures (known as jtrees) and approximately captures the cutflow and metric structure of the graph. The $O(1)$approximation guarantee of (2) is by adapting the distance oracles by [ThorupZwick JACM `05].more »

Abstract In a Merlin–Arthur proof system, the proof verifier (Arthur) accepts valid proofs (from Merlin) with probability 1, and rejects invalid proofs with probability arbitrarily close to 1. The running time of such a system is defined to be the length of Merlin’s proof plus the running time of Arthur. We provide new Merlin–Arthur proof systems for some key problems in finegrained complexity. In several cases our proof systems have optimal running time. Our main results include:
Certifying that a list of
n integers has no 3SUM solution can be done in Merlin–Arthur time . Previously, Carmosino et al. [ITCS 2016] showed that the problem has a nondeterministic algorithm running in$$\tilde{O}(n)$$ $\stackrel{~}{O}\left(n\right)$ time (that is, there is a proof system with proofs of length$$\tilde{O}(n^{1.5})$$ $\stackrel{~}{O}\left({n}^{1.5}\right)$ and a deterministic verifier running in$$\tilde{O}(n^{1.5})$$ $\stackrel{~}{O}\left({n}^{1.5}\right)$ time).$$\tilde{O}(n^{1.5})$$ $\stackrel{~}{O}\left({n}^{1.5}\right)$Counting the number of
k cliques with total edge weight equal to zero in ann node graph can be done in Merlin–Arthur time (where$${\tilde{O}}(n^{\lceil k/2\rceil })$$ $\stackrel{~}{O}\left({n}^{\lceil k/2\rceil}\right)$ ). For odd$$k\ge 3$$ $k\ge 3$k , this bound can be further improved for sparse graphs: for example, counting the number of zeroweight triangles in anm edge graph can be done in Merlin–Arthur time . Previous Merlin–Arthur protocols by Williams [CCC’16] and Björklund and Kaski [PODC’16] could only count$${\tilde{O}}(m)$$ $\stackrel{~}{O}\left(m\right)$k cliques in unweighted graphs, and had worse running times for smallk .Computing the AllPairsmore »
Certifying that an
n variablek CNF is unsatisfiable can be done in Merlin–Arthur time . We also observe an algebrization barrier for the previous$$2^{n/2  n/O(k)}$$ ${2}^{n/2n/O\left(k\right)}$ time Merlin–Arthur protocol of R. Williams [CCC’16] for$$2^{n/2}\cdot \textrm{poly}(n)$$ ${2}^{n/2}\xb7\text{poly}\left(n\right)$ SAT: in particular, his protocol algebrizes, and we observe there is no algebrizing protocol for$$\#$$ $\#$k UNSAT running in time. Therefore we have to exploit nonalgebrizing properties to obtain our new protocol.$$2^{n/2}/n^{\omega (1)}$$ ${2}^{n/2}/{n}^{\omega \left(1\right)}$ Due to the centrality of these problems in finegrained complexity, our results have consequences for many other problems of interest. For example, our work implies that certifying there is no Subset Sum solution toCertifying a Quantified Boolean Formula is true can be done in Merlin–Arthur time
. Previously, the only nontrivial result known along these lines was an Arthur Merlin–Arthur protocol (where Merlin’s proof depends on some of Arthur’s coins) running in$$2^{4n/5}\cdot \textrm{poly}(n)$$ ${2}^{4n/5}\xb7\text{poly}\left(n\right)$ time.$$2^{2n/3}\cdot \textrm{poly}(n)$$ ${2}^{2n/3}\xb7\text{poly}\left(n\right)$n integers can be done in Merlin–Arthur time , improving on the previous best protocol by Nederlof [IPL 2017] which took$$2^{n/3}\cdot \textrm{poly}(n)$$ ${2}^{n/3}\xb7\text{poly}\left(n\right)$ time.$$2^{0.49991n}\cdot \textrm{poly}(n)$$ ${2}^{0.49991n}\xb7\text{poly}\left(n\right)$ 
We revisit the muchstudied problem of spaceefficiently estimating the number of triangles in a graph stream, and extensions of this problem to counting fixedsized cliques and cycles, obtaining a number of new upper and lower bounds. For the important special case of counting triangles, we give a $4$pass, $(1\pm\varepsilon)$approximate, randomized algorithm that needs at most $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{2}\cdot m^{3/2}/T)$ space, where $m$ is the number of edges and $T$ is a promised lower bound on the number of triangles. This matches the space bound of a very recent algorithm (McGregor et al., PODS 2016), with an arguably simpler and more general technique. We give an improved multipass lower bound of $\Omega(\min\{m^{3/2}/T, m/\sqrt{T}\})$, applicable at essentially all densities $\Omega(n) \le m \le O(n^2)$. We also prove other multipass lower bounds in terms of various structural parameters of the input graph. Together, our results resolve a couple of open questions raised in recent work (Braverman et al., ICALP 2013). Our presentation emphasizes more general frameworks, for both upper and lower bounds. We give a sampling algorithm for counting arbitrary subgraphs and then improve it via combinatorial means in the special cases of counting odd cliques and odd cycles. Our results show that these problemsmore »