Recent advances in satellite observations of solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) provide a new opportunity to constrain the simulation of terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP). Accurate representation of the processes driving SIF emission and its radiative transfer to remote sensing sensors is an essential prerequisite for data assimilation. Recently, SIF simulations have been incorporated into several land surface models, but the scaling of SIF from leaf‐level to canopy‐level is usually not well‐represented. Here, we incorporate the simulation of far‐red SIF observed at nadir into the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5). Leaf‐level fluorescence yield was simulated by a parametric simplification of the Soil Canopy‐Observation of Photosynthesis and Energy fluxes model (SCOPE). And an efficient and accurate method based on escape probability is developed to scale SIF from leaf‐level to top‐of‐canopy while taking clumping and the radiative transfer processes into account. SIF simulated by CLM5 and SCOPE agreed well at sites except one in needleleaf forest (
Accurate estimation of terrestrial gross primary productivity (
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10036920
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley-Blackwell
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Global Change Biology
- Volume:
- 23
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 1354-1013
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 2874-2886
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract R 2 > 0.91, root‐mean‐square error <0.19 W⋅m−2⋅sr−1⋅μm−1), and captured the day‐to‐day variation of tower‐measured SIF at temperate forest sites (R 2 > 0.68). At the global scale, simulated SIF generally captured the spatial and seasonal patterns of satellite‐observed SIF. Factors including the fluorescence emission model, clumping, bidirectional effect, and leaf optical properties had considerable impacts on SIF simulation, and the discrepancies between simulate d and observed SIF varied with plant functional type. By improving the representation of radiative transfer for SIF simulation, our model allows better comparisons between simulated and observed SIF toward constraining GPP simulations. -
more » « less
Abstract Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been increasingly used as a proxy for terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP). Previous work mainly evaluated the relationship between satellite‐observed SIF and gridded GPP products both based on coarse spatial resolutions. Finer resolution SIF (1.3 km × 2.25 km) measured from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory‐2 (OCO‐2) provides the first opportunity to examine the SIF–GPP relationship at the ecosystem scale using flux tower GPP data. However, it remains unclear how strong the relationship is for each biome and whether a robust, universal relationship exists across a variety of biomes. Here we conducted the first global analysis of the relationship between OCO‐2 SIF and tower GPP for a total of 64 flux sites across the globe encompassing eight major biomes. OCO‐2 SIF showed strong correlations with tower GPP at both midday and daily timescales, with the strongest relationship observed for daily SIF at the 757 nm (
R 2 = 0.72,p < 0.0001). Strong linear relationships between SIF and GPP were consistently found for all biomes (R 2 = 0.57–0.79,p < 0.0001) except evergreen broadleaf forests (R 2 = 0.16,p < 0.05) at the daily timescale. A higher slope was found for C4grasslands and croplands than for C3ecosystems. The generally consistent slope of the relationship among biomes suggests a nearly universal rather than biome‐specific SIF–GPP relationship, and this finding is an important distinction and simplification compared to previous results. SIF was mainly driven by absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and was also influenced by environmental stresses (temperature and water stresses) that determine photosynthetic light use efficiency. OCO‐2 SIF generally had a better performance for predicting GPP than satellite‐derived vegetation indices and a light use efficiency model. The universal SIF–GPP relationship can potentially lead to more accurate GPP estimates regionally or globally. Our findings revealed the remarkable ability of finer resolution SIF observations from OCO‐2 and other new or future missions (e.g., TROPOMI, FLEX) for estimating terrestrial photosynthesis across a wide variety of biomes and identified their potential and limitations for ecosystem functioning and carbon cycle studies. -
more » « less
Abstract Wetlands play an important role in regulating the atmospheric carbon dioxide (
CO 2) concentrations and thus affecting the climate. However, there is still lack of quantitative evaluation of such a role across different wetland types, especially at the global scale. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis to compare ecosystemCO 2fluxes among various types of wetlands using a global database compiled from the literature. This database consists of 143 site‐years of eddy covariance data from 22 inland wetland and 21 coastal wetland sites across the globe. Coastal wetlands had higher annual gross primary productivity (GPP ), ecosystem respiration (R e), and net ecosystem productivity (NEP ) than inland wetlands. On a per unit area basis, coastal wetlands provided largeCO 2sinks, while inland wetlands provided smallCO 2sinks or were nearlyCO 2neutral. The annualCO 2sink strength was 93.15 and 208.37 g C m−2for inland and coastal wetlands, respectively. AnnualCO 2fluxes were mainly regulated by mean annual temperature (MAT ) and mean annual precipitation (MAP ). For coastal and inland wetlands combined,MAT andMAP explained 71%, 54%, and 57% of the variations inGPP ,R e, andNEP , respectively. TheCO 2fluxes of wetlands were also related to leaf area index (LAI ). TheCO 2fluxes also varied with water table depth (WTD ), although the effects ofWTD were not statistically significant.NEP was jointly determined byGPP andR efor both inland and coastal wetlands. However, theNEP /R eandNEP /GPP ratios exhibited little variability for inland wetlands and decreased for coastal wetlands with increasing latitude. The contrasting ofCO 2fluxes between inland and coastal wetlands globally can improve our understanding of the roles of wetlands in the global C cycle. Our results also have implications for informing wetland management and climate change policymaking, for example, the efforts being made by international organizations and enterprises to restore coastal wetlands for enhancing blue carbon sinks. -
more » « less
Abstract Woody plant encroachment (
WPE ) into grasslands has been occurring globally and may be accelerated by climate change in the future. This land cover change is expected to alter the carbon and water cycles, but it remains uncertain how and to what extent the carbon and water cycles may change withWPE into grasslands under current climate. In this study, we examined the difference of vegetation indices (VI s), evapotranspiration (ET ), gross primary production (GPP ), and solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF ) during 2000–2010 between grasslands and juniper‐encroached grasslands. We also quantitatively assessed the changes ofGPP andET for grasslands with different proportions of juniper encroachment (JWPE ). Our results suggested thatJWPE increased theGPP ,ET , greenness‐relatedVI s, andSIF of grasslands. Mean annualGPP andET were, respectively, ~55% and ~45% higher when grasslands were completely converted into juniper forests under contemporary climate during 2000–2010. The enhancement of annualGPP andET for grasslands withJWPE varied over years ranging from about +20%GPP (~+30% forET ) in the wettest year (2007) to about twice as muchGPP (~+55% forET ) in the severe drought year (2006) relative to grasslands without encroachment. Additionally, the differences inGPP andET showed significant seasonal dynamics. During the peak growing season (May–August),GPP andET for grasslands withJWPE were ~30% and ~40% higher on average. This analysis provided insights into how and to what degree carbon and water cycles were impacted byJWPE , which is vital to understanding howJWPE and ecological succession will affect the regional and global carbon and water budgets in the future. -
more » « less
Abstract Earth system models (
ESM s) rely on the calculation of canopy conductance in land surface models (LSM s) to quantify the partitioning of land surface energy, water, andCO 2fluxes. This is achieved by scaling stomatal conductance,g w, determined from physiological models developed for leaves. Traditionally, models forg whave been semi‐empirical, combining physiological functions with empirically determined calibration constants. More recently, optimization theory has been applied to modelg winLSM s under the premise that it has a stronger grounding in physiological theory and might ultimately lead to improved predictive accuracy. However, this premise has not been thoroughly tested. Using original field data from contrasting forest systems, we compare a widely used empirical type and a more recently developed optimization‐typeg wmodel, termedBB andMED , respectively. Overall, we find no difference between the two models when used to simulateg wfrom photosynthesis data, or leaf gas exchange from a coupled photosynthesis‐conductance model, or gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration for aFLUXNET tower site with theCLM 5 communityLSM . Field measurements reveal that the key fitted parameters forBB andMED ,g 1Bandg 1M,exhibit strong species specificity in magnitude and sensitivity toCO 2, andCLM 5 simulations reveal that failure to include this sensitivity can result in significant overestimates of evapotranspiration for high‐CO 2scenarios. Further, we show thatg 1Bandg 1Mcan be determined from meanc i/c a(ratio of leaf intercellular to ambientCO 2concentration). Applying this relationship withc i/c avalues derived from a leaf δ13C database, we obtain a global distribution ofg 1Bandg 1M, and these values correlate significantly with mean annual precipitation. This provides a new methodology for global parameterization of theBB andMED models inLSM s, tied directly to leaf physiology but unconstrained by spatial boundaries separating designated biomes or plant functional types.
