An official website of the United States government
We present a weighted approach to compute a maximum cardinality matching in an arbitrary bipartite graph. Our main result is a new algorithm that takes as input a weighted bipartite graph G(A cup B,E) with edge weights of 0 or 1. Let w <= n be an upper bound on the weight of any matching in G. Consider the subgraph induced by all the edges of G with a weight 0. Suppose every connected component in this subgraph has O(r) vertices and O(mr/n) edges. We present an algorithm to compute a maximum cardinality matching in G in O~(m(sqrt{w} + sqrt{r} + wr/n)) time. When all the edge weights are 1 (symmetrically when all weights are 0), our algorithm will be identical to the well-known Hopcroft-Karp (HK) algorithm, which runs in O(m sqrt{n}) time. However, if we can carefully assign weights of 0 and 1 on its edges such that both w and r are sub-linear in n and wr=O(n^{gamma}) for gamma < 3/2, then we can compute maximum cardinality matching in G in o(m sqrt{n}) time. Using our algorithm, we obtain a new O~(n^{4/3}/epsilon^4) time algorithm to compute an epsilon-approximate bottleneck matching of A,B subsetR^2 and an 1/(epsilon^{O(d)}}n^{1+(d-1)/(2d-1)}) poly log n time algorithm for computing epsilon-approximate bottleneck matching in d-dimensions. All previous algorithms take Omega(n^{3/2}) time. Given any graph G(A cup B,E) that has an easily computable balanced vertex separator for every subgraph G'(V',E') of size |V'|^{delta}, for delta in [1/2,1), we can apply our algorithm to compute a maximum matching in O~(mn^{delta/1+delta}) time improving upon the O(m sqrt{n}) time taken by the HK-Algorithm.
more »
« less
Designing Scalable b-MATCHING Algorithms on Distributed Memory Multiprocessors by Approximation
A b-matching is a subset of edges M such that at most b(v) edges in M are incident on each vertex v, where b(v) is specified. We present a distributed-memory parallel algorithm, \bsuitor, that computes a b-matching with more than half the maximum weight in a graph with weights on the edges. The approximation algorithm is designed to have high concurrency and low time complexity. We organize the implementation of the algorithm in terms of asynchronous super-steps that combine computation and communication, and balance the computational work and frequency of communication to obtain high performance. Since the performance of the b-suitor algorithm is strongly influenced by communication, we present several strategies to reduce the communication volume. We implement the algorithm using a hybrid strategy where inter-node communication uses MPI and intra-node computation is done with OpenMP threads. We demonstrate strong and weak scaling of b-suitor up to 16,000 processors on two supercomputers at NERSC. We compute a b-matching in a graph with 2 billion edges in under 4 seconds using 16,000 processors.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1637534
- PAR ID:
- 10039359
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference (SC16)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 773 to 783
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
We describe a 3/2-approximation algorithm, \lse, for computing a b-edgecover of minimum weight in a graph with weights on the edges. The b-edgecover problem is a generalization of the better-known Edge Cover problem in graphs, where the objective is to choose a subset C of edges in the graph such that at least a specified number b(v) of edges in C are incident on each vertex v. In the weighted b-edgecover problem, we minimize the sum of the weights of the edges in C. We prove that the Locally Subdominant edge (LSE) algorithm computes the same b-edge cover as the one obtained by the Greedy algorithm for the problem. However, the Greedy algorithm requires edges to be sorted by their effective weights, and these weights need to be updated after each iteration. These requirements make the Greedy algorithm sequential and impractical for massive graphs. The LSE algorithm avoids the sorting step, and is amenable for parallelization. We implement the algorithm on a serial machine and compare its performance against a collection of approximation algorithms for the b-edge cover problem. Our results show that the algorithm is 3 to 5 times faster than the Greedy algorithm on a serial processor. The approximate edge covers obtained by the LSE algorithm have weights greater by at most 17% of the optimal weight for problems where we could compute the latter. We also investigate the relationship between the b-edge cover and the b-matching problems, show that the latter has a faster implementation since edge weights are static in this algorithm, and obtain a heuristic solution for the former from the latter.more » « less
-
Bender, M.; Gilbert, J.; Hendrickson, B.; Sullivan, B. (Ed.)We design new serial and parallel approximation algorithms for computing a maximum weight b-matching in an edge-weighted graph with a submodular objective function. This problem is NP-hard; the new algorithms have approximation ratio 1/3, and are relaxations of the Greedy algorithm that rely only on local information in the graph, making them parallelizable. We have designed and implemented Local Lazy Greedy algorithms for both serial and parallel computers. We have applied the approximate submodular b-matching algorithm to assign tasks to processors in the computation of Fock matrices in quantum chemistry on parallel computers. The assignment seeks to reduce the run time by balancing the computational load on the processors and bounding the number of messages that each processor sends. We show that the new assignment of tasks to processors provides a four fold speedup over the currently used assignment in the NWChemEx software on 8000 processors on the Summit supercomputer at Oak Ridge National Lab.more » « less
-
State-of-the-art synchronous graph processing frameworks face both inefficiency and imbalance issues that cause their performance to be suboptimal. These issues include the inefficiency of communication and the imbalanced graph computation/communication costs in an iteration. We propose to replace their conventional two-sided communication model with the one-sided counterpart. Accordingly, we design SHMEMGraph, an efficient and balanced graph processing framework that is formulated across a global memory space and takes advantage of the flexibility and efficiency of one-sided communication for graph processing. Through an efficient one-sided communication channel, SHMEMGraph utilizes the high-performance operations with RDMA while minimizing the resource contention within a computer node. In addition, SHMEMGraph synthesizes a number of optimizations to address both computation imbalance and communication imbalance. By using a graph of 1 billion edges, our evaluation shows that compared to the state-of-the-art Gemini framework, SHMEMGraph achieves an average improvement of 35.5% in terms of job completion time for five representative graph algorithms.more » « less
-
We describe a paradigm for designing parallel algorithms via approximation, and illustrate it on the b-edgecover problem. A b-edgecover of minimum weight in a graph is a subset $$C$$ of its edges such that at least a specified number $b(v)$ of edges in $$C$$ is incident on each vertex $$v$$, and the sum of the edge weights in $$C$$ is minimum. The Greedy algorithm and a variant, the LSE algorithm, provide $3/2$-approximation guarantees in the worst-case for this problem, but these algorithms have limited parallelism. Hence we design two new $$2$$-approximation algorithms with greater concurrency. The MCE algorithm reduces the computation of a b-edgecover to that of finding a b'-matching, by exploiting the relationship between these subgraphs in an approximation context. The LSE-NW is derived from the LSEalgorithm using static edge weights rather than dynamically computing effective edge weights. This relaxation gives LSE a worse approximation guarantee but makes it more amenable to parallelization. We prove that both the MCE and LSE-NW algorithms compute the same b-edgecover with at most twice the weight of the minimum weight edge cover. In practice, the $$2$$-approximation and $3/2$-approximation algorithms compute edge covers of weight within $$10\%$$ the optimal. We implement three of the approximation algorithms, MCE, LSE, and LSE-NW on shared memory multi-core machines, including an Intel Xeon and an IBM Power8 machine with 8 TB memory. The MCE algorithm is the fastest of these by an order of magnitude or more. It computes an edge cover in a graph with billions of edges in $20$ seconds using two hundred threads on the IBM Power8. We also show that the parallel depth and work can be bounded for the Suitor and b-Suitor algorithms when edge weights are random.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.2016.65
