An official website of the United States government
Crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic continuously threaten our world and emotionally affect billions of people worldwide in distinct ways. Understanding the triggers leading to people’s emotions is of crucial importance. Social media posts can be a good source of such analysis, yet these texts tend to be charged with multiple emotions, with triggers scattering across multiple sentences. This paper takes a novel angle, namely, emotion detection and trigger summarization, aiming to both detect perceived emotions in text, and summarize events and their appraisals that trigger each emotion. To support this goal, we introduce CovidET (Emotions and their Triggers during Covid-19), a dataset of ~1,900 English Reddit posts related to COVID-19, which contains manual annotations of perceived emotions and abstractive summaries of their triggers described in the post. We develop strong baselines to jointly detect emotions and summarize emotion triggers. Our analyses show that CovidET presents new challenges in emotion-specific summarization, as well as multi-emotion detection in long social media posts.
more »
« less
Understanding the Semantics of Narratives of Interpersonal Violence through Reader Annotations and Physiological Reactions
Interpersonal violence (IPV) is a prominent sociological problem that affects people of all demographic backgrounds. By analyzing how readers interpret, perceive, and react to experiences narrated in social media posts, we explore an understudied source for discourse about abuse. We asked readers to annotate Reddit posts about relationships with vs. without IPV for stakeholder roles and emotion, while measuring their galvanic skin response (GSR), pulse, and facial expression. We map annotations to coreference resolution output to obtain a labeled coreference chain for stakeholders in texts, and apply automated semantic role labeling for analyzing IPV discourse. Findings provide insights into how readers process roles and emotion in narratives. For example, abusers tend to be linked with violent actions and certain affect states. We train classifiers to predict stakeholder categories of coreference chains. We also find that subjects' GSR noticeably changed for IPV texts, suggesting that co-collected measurement-based data about annotators can be used to support text annotation.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1559889
- PAR ID:
- 10042954
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the Workshop Computational Semantics Beyond Events and Roles
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Coreference choices are influenced by multiple factors, including information structural categories such as topic and focus. These information structural categories can be indicated by intonation, yet few studies have investigated how intonation affects subsequent choices for coreference. Using a story continuation experiment with aurally presented stimuli, we show that the location of contrastive focus in Mainstream American English significantly affects the preferred referent for the subject of the next sentence in a short discourse.more » « less
-
Research suggests that Indigenous girls, women, and LGBTQ+ Two-Spirit people experience disproportionately high rates of intimate partner violence (IPV), but there is a dearth of research on IPV among Indigenous college students. Therefore, the current study sought to explore rates of IPV victimization and perpetration among Indigenous college students, as well as correlates including depressive and anxious symptoms, emotion dysregulation, on-campus social support, and hazardous drinking. Participants were 230 undergraduate students who identified as American Indian/Alaska Native attending 20 medium- and large-sized universities across the contiguous U.S. Results indicated that 28.9% of Indigenous students reported any type of IPV victimization in the past 6 months (psychological: 24.5%; physical: 9.1%; sexual: 9.8%; coercive control: 12.4%). Further, 18.3% of Indigenous students reported any type of IPV perpetration in the past 6 months (psychological: 16.9%; physical: 4.5%; sexual: 2.6%; coercive control: 7.1%). Anxious and depressive symptoms were related to many forms of IPV victimization; emotion dysregulation was related to all forms of IPV victimization and sexual IPV perpetration; and hazardous drinking was related to most forms of IPV victimization and perpetration. These findings underscore the alarmingly high rates of IPV among Indigenous college students as well as the potential deleterious effects of IPV victimization on psychological functioning, as well as the need to concurrently address hazardous alcohol use in IPV prevention and response efforts.more » « less
-
Barner, D; Bramley, N R; Ruggeri, A; Walker, C M (Ed.)Analogies are widely used in science textbooks to connect unfamiliar phenomena to more familiar everyday objects and processes in the hope they will help students better understand the scientific explanations of complex processes. However, the emerging literature on the illusion of explanatory depth suggests that people are highly overconfident in their understanding of the causal processes underlying how everyday objects and devices work. Thus, analogies involving familiar everyday objects may inflate judgments of understanding (JOUs) for the to-be-learned scientific explanations. Two experiments tested whether common analogies used in geology textbooks increase students’ JOUs for geology phenomena. A first experiment showed that analogies notably increase JOUs when presented and judged as individual sentences. A second experiment showed that when these same sentences containing analogies were embedded within longer explanatory texts, they did not help (and sometimes harmed) actual understanding. Readers showed general overconfidence. However, unlike the first experiment, when readers made global JOUs about their overall understanding of entire texts, those JOUs did not differ depending on whether there were analogies embedded within the texts. Results extend prior work on the effect of analogies on metacomprehension, and have potential implications for the interpretation of findings related to the illusion of explanatory depth.more » « less
-
Barner, D; Bramley, N R; Ruggeri, A; Walker, C M (Ed.)Analogies are widely used in science textbooks to connect unfamiliar phenomena to more familiar everyday objects and processes in the hope they will help students better understand the scientific explanations of complex processes. However, the emerging literature on the illusion of explanatory depth suggests that people are highly overconfident in their understanding of the causal processes underlying how everyday objects and devices work. Thus, analogies involving familiar everyday objects may inflate judgments of understanding (JOUs) for the to-be-learned scientific explanations. Two experiments tested whether common analogies used in geology textbooks increase students’ JOUs for geology phenomena. A first experiment showed that analogies notably increase JOUs when presented and judged as individual sentences. A second experiment showed that when these same sentences containing analogies were embedded within longer explanatory texts, they did not help (and sometimes harmed) actual understanding. Readers showed general overconfidence. However, unlike the first experiment, when readers made global JOUs about their overall understanding of entire texts, those JOUs did not differ depending on whether there were analogies embedded within the texts. Results extend prior work on the effect of analogies on metacomprehension, and have potential implications for the interpretation of findings related to the illusion of explanatory depth.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
