skip to main content


Title: Community interest and feasibility of using a novel smartphone‐based formaldehyde exposure detection technology
Abstract Objective

This study is the first community engagement phase of a project to develop a residential formaldehyde detection system. The objectives were to conduct a feasibility assessment for device use, and identify factors associated with concerns about environmental exposure and community interest in this device.

Design and Sample

A cross‐sectional, internet‐based survey employing community‐based participatory research principles was utilized. 147 individuals participated from a focused Waycross, Georgia (58.5%) and broader national sample (41.5%).

Measures

Variables included acceptable cost and number of testing samples, interest in conducting tests, levels of concern over pollutants, health status, housing, and demographics.

Results

The majority of participants desired a system with fewer than 10 samples at ≤$15.00 per sample. Statistically significant higher levels of concern over air quality, formaldehyde exposure, and interest in testing formaldehyde were observed for those with overall worse health status and living in the Waycross, Georgia geographic region. Significant differences in formaldehyde testing interest were observed by health status (OR = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.12–0.81 for home testing) and geographic location (OR = 3.16, 95%CI = 1.22–8.14 for home andOR = 4.06, 95%CI = 1.48–11.12 for ambient testing) in multivariate models.

Conclusions

Geographic location and poorer general health status were associated with concerns over and interest in formaldehyde testing.

 
more » « less
Award ID(s):
1645048
NSF-PAR ID:
10049444
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Public Health Nursing
Volume:
35
Issue:
4
ISSN:
0737-1209
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 261-272
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract STUDY QUESTION

    To what extent is preconception maternal or paternal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination associated with miscarriage incidence?

    SUMMARY ANSWER

    COVID-19 vaccination in either partner at any time before conception is not associated with an increased rate of miscarriage.

    WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

    Several observational studies have evaluated the safety of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and found no association with miscarriage, though no study prospectively evaluated the risk of early miscarriage (gestational weeks [GW] <8) in relation to COVID-19 vaccination. Moreover, no study has evaluated the role of preconception vaccination in both male and female partners.

    STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

    An Internet-based, prospective preconception cohort study of couples residing in the USA and Canada. We analyzed data from 1815 female participants who conceived during December 2020–November 2022, including 1570 couples with data on male partner vaccination.

    PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

    Eligible female participants were aged 21–45 years and were trying to conceive without use of fertility treatment at enrollment. Female participants completed questionnaires at baseline, every 8 weeks until pregnancy, and during early and late pregnancy; they could also invite their male partners to complete a baseline questionnaire. We collected data on COVID-19 vaccination (brand and date of doses), history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (yes/no and date of positive test), potential confounders (demographic, reproductive, and lifestyle characteristics), and pregnancy status on all questionnaires. Vaccination status was categorized as never (0 doses before conception), ever (≥1 dose before conception), having a full primary sequence before conception, and completing the full primary sequence ≤3 months before conception. These categories were not mutually exclusive. Participants were followed up from their first positive pregnancy test until miscarriage or a censoring event (induced abortion, ectopic pregnancy, loss to follow-up, 20 weeks’ gestation), whichever occurred first. We estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for miscarriage and corresponding 95% CIs using Cox proportional hazards models with GW as the time scale. We used propensity score fine stratification weights to adjust for confounding.

    MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

    Among 1815 eligible female participants, 75% had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by the time of conception. Almost one-quarter of pregnancies resulted in miscarriage, and 75% of miscarriages occurred <8 weeks’ gestation. The propensity score-weighted IRR comparing female participants who received at least one dose any time before conception versus those who had not been vaccinated was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.63, 1.14). COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with increased risk of either early miscarriage (GW: <8) or late miscarriage (GW: 8–19). There was no indication of an increased risk of miscarriage associated with male partner vaccination (IRR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.56, 1.44).

    LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

    The present study relied on self-reported vaccination status and infection history. Thus, there may be some non-differential misclassification of exposure status. While misclassification of miscarriage is also possible, the preconception cohort design and high prevalence of home pregnancy testing in this cohort reduced the potential for under-ascertainment of miscarriage. As in all observational studies, residual or unmeasured confounding is possible.

    WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

    This is the first study to evaluate prospectively the relation between preconception COVID-19 vaccination in both partners and miscarriage, with more complete ascertainment of early miscarriages than earlier studies of vaccination. The findings are informative for individuals planning a pregnancy and their healthcare providers.

    STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

    This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Institute of Health [R01-HD086742 (PI: L.A.W.); R01-HD105863S1 (PI: L.A.W. and M.L.E.)], the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R03-AI154544; PI: A.K.R.), and the National Science Foundation (NSF-1914792; PI: L.A.W.). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report, or the decision to submit the paper for publication. L.A.W. is a fibroid consultant for AbbVie, Inc. She also receives in-kind donations from Swiss Precision Diagnostics (Clearblue home pregnancy tests) and Kindara.com (fertility apps). M.L.E. received consulting fees from Ro, Hannah, Dadi, VSeat, and Underdog, holds stock in Ro, Hannah, Dadi, and Underdog, is a past president of SSMR, and is a board member of SMRU. K.F.H. reports being an investigator on grants to her institution from UCB and Takeda, unrelated to this study. S.H.-D. reports being an investigator on grants to her institution from Takeda, unrelated to this study, and a methods consultant for UCB and Roche for unrelated drugs. The authors report no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

    TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

    N/A.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Objectives

    The objectives of this work were to evaluate (i) the prevalence and frequency of caregiver‐reported soil ingestion by children, (ii) whether household flooring material in the bedroom (earthvs. concrete) affected caregiver‐reported soil ingestion, (iii) whether caregiver‐reported soil ingestion was associated with caregiver‐reported diarrhoea and (iv) caregivers’ perceptions of their children ingesting soil.

    Methods

    We conducted 309 household surveys in northern Ghana, including 529 children under five (249 children aged 6–36 months), and measured faecal contamination in soil from 31 households.

    Results

    Among all children, 15% were reported to have directly ingested soil in the past week, including 28% of children aged 6–36 months. Among children reported to have ingested soil, the median frequency was 14 times in the past week, and the median amount of soil ingested each time was half a handful. There was no association between household floor material and whether the caregiver observed a child directly ingesting soil. After adjusting for household floor material and other potential confounding variables, caregiver‐reported soil ingestion was associated with caregiver‐reported diarrhoea for children under five [adjusted odds ratio (adj.OR) = 3.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.76–3.55] and children aged 6–36 months (adj.OR= 2.61, 95%CI2.01–3.39). Approximately 83% of caregivers whose children ingested soil reported they thought it was unsafe and were more likely to report stopping their child from ingesting soil, but these responses did not affect the quantity of soil ingested.

    Conclusions

    Our results suggest direct soil ingestion is associated with diarrhoea independent of household floor material, and separate interventions may be necessary to prevent exploratory soil ingestion.

     
    more » « less
  3. Background

    Inhibitory control training and working memory training are 2 cognitive interventions that have been considered for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Existing studies have typically relied on small samples that preclude the evaluation of small effects. Crowdsourcing is a sampling method that can address these limitations by effectively and efficiently recruiting large samples with varying health histories. This study tested the feasibility and acceptability of delivering cognitive training interventions via crowdsourcing.

    Methods

    Participants withAUDwere recruited from the crowdsourcing website Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk) (ClinicalTrials.gov;NCT03438539). Following completion of a baseline survey, participants were randomized to an inhibitory control, working memory, or control training condition. Participants were asked to complete training tasks daily over a 2‐week period. Follow‐up assessments evaluating acceptability measures and alcohol and soda consumption were completed immediately following and 2 weeks after training.

    Results

    Response rates were satisfactory over the 2‐week intervention period (65% of training tasks completed), and performance on training tasks was consistent with expected effects. A majority of participants indicated that they were satisfied with the study procedures (94.6%), would participate again (97.4%), and would consider incorporating the training task in their daily life (81.1%). Modest reductions in alcohol consumption were observed (e.g., 0.5 drinking day/wk), primarily in the inhibitory control group, and these effects were selective to alcohol use and did not extend to soda consumption.

    Conclusions

    These findings demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of utilizing crowdsourcing methods for interventions development. Such a demonstration helps establish the crowdsourcing setting for future large sample studies testing novel interventions forAUDand other substance use disorders.

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Home range estimation is routine practice in ecological research. While advances in animal tracking technology have increased our capacity to collect data to support home range analysis, these same advances have also resulted in increasingly autocorrelated data. Consequently, the question of which home range estimator to use on modern, highly autocorrelated tracking data remains open. This question is particularly relevant given that most estimators assume independently sampled data. Here, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of autocorrelation on home range estimation. We base our study on an extensive data set ofGPSlocations from 369 individuals representing 27 species distributed across five continents. We first assemble a broad array of home range estimators, including Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) with four bandwidth optimizers (Gaussian reference function, autocorrelated‐Gaussian reference function [AKDE], Silverman's rule of thumb, and least squares cross‐validation), Minimum Convex Polygon, and Local Convex Hull methods. Notably, all of these estimators exceptAKDEassume independent and identically distributed (IID) data. We then employ half‐sample cross‐validation to objectively quantify estimator performance, and the recently introduced effective sample size for home range area estimation () to quantify the information content of each data set. We found thatAKDE95% area estimates were larger than conventionalIID‐based estimates by a mean factor of 2. The median number of cross‐validated locations included in the hold‐out sets byAKDE95% (or 50%) estimates was 95.3% (or 50.1%), confirming the largerAKDEranges were appropriately selective at the specified quantile. Conversely, conventional estimates exhibited negative bias that increased with decreasing . To contextualize our empirical results, we performed a detailed simulation study to tease apart how sampling frequency, sampling duration, and the focal animal's movement conspire to affect range estimates. Paralleling our empirical results, the simulation study demonstrated thatAKDEwas generally more accurate than conventional methods, particularly for small . While 72% of the 369 empirical data sets had >1,000 total observations, only 4% had an >1,000, where 30% had an <30. In this frequently encountered scenario of small ,AKDEwas the only estimator capable of producing an accurate home range estimate on autocorrelated data.

     
    more » « less
  5. Rationale

    It is imperative to understand how chemical preservation alters tissue isotopic compositions before using historical samples in ecological studies. Specifically, although compound‐specific isotope analysis of amino acids (CSIA‐AA) is becoming a widely used tool, there is little information on how preservation techniques affect amino acidδ15N values.

    Methods

    We evaluated the effects of chemical preservatives on bulk tissueδ13C andδ15N and amino acidδ15N values, measured by gas chromatography/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/IRMS), of (a) tuna (Thunnus albacares) and squid (Dosidicus gigas) muscle tissues that were fixed in formaldehyde and stored in ethanol for 2 years and (b) two copepod species,Calanus pacificusandEucalanus californicus, which were preserved in formaldehyde for 24–25 years.

    Results

    Tissues in formaldehyde‐ethanol had higher bulkδ15N values (+1.4,D. gigas; +1.6‰,T. albacares), higherδ13C values forD. gigas(+0.5‰), and lowerδ13C values forT. albacares(−0.8‰) than frozen samples. The bulkδ15N values from copepods were not different those from frozen samples, although theδ13C values from both species were lower (−1.0‰ forE. californicusand −2.2‰ forC. pacificus) than those from frozen samples. The mean amino acidδ15N values from chemically preserved tissues were largely within 1‰ of those of frozen tissues, but the phenylalanineδ15N values were altered to a larger extent (range: 0.5–4.5‰).

    Conclusions

    The effects of preservation on bulkδ13C values were variable, where the direction and magnitude of change varied among taxa. The changes in bulkδ15N values associated with chemical preservation were mostly minimal, suggesting that storage in formaldehyde or ethanol will not affect the interpretation ofδ15N values used in ecological studies. The preservation effects on amino acidδ15N values were also mostly minimal, mirroring bulkδ15N trends, which is promising for future CSIA‐AA studies of archived specimens. However, there were substantial differences in phenylalanine and valineδ15N values, which we speculate resulted from interference in the chromatographic resolution of unknown compounds rather than alteration of tissue isotopic composition due to chemical preservation.

     
    more » « less