Next‐generation electronics and energy technologies can now be developed as a result of the design, discovery, and development of novel, environmental friendly lead (Pb)‐free ferroelectric materials with improved characteristics and performance. However, there have only been a few reports of such complex materials’ design with multi‐phase interfacial chemistry, which can facilitate enhanced properties and performance. In this context, herein, novel lead‐free piezoelectric materials (1‐
Organometallic halide perovskites (OMHPs) have attracted broad attention as prospective materials for optoelectronic applications. Among the many anomalous properties of these materials, of special interest are the ferroelectric properties including both classical and relaxor‐like components, as a potential origin of slow dynamics, field enhancement, and anomalous mobilities. Here, ferroelectric properties of the three representative OMHPs are explored, including FAPb
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10049972
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Advanced Materials
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 0935-9648
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract x )Ba0.95Ca0.05Ti0.95Zr0.05O3‐(x )Ba0.95Ca0.05Ti0.95Sn0.05O3, are reported, which are represented as (1‐x )BCZT‐(x )BCST, with demonstrated excellent properties and energy harvesting performance. The (1‐x )BCZT‐(x )BCST materials are synthesized by high‐temperature solid‐state ceramic reaction method by varyingx in the full range (x = 0.00–1.00). In‐depth exploration research is performed on the structural, dielectric, ferroelectric, and electro‐mechanical properties of (1‐x )BCZT‐(x )BCST ceramics. The formation of perovskite structure for all ceramics without the presence of any impurity phases is confirmed by X‐ray diffraction (XRD) analyses, which also reveals that the Ca2+, Zr4+, and Sn4+are well dispersed within the BaTiO3lattice. For all (1‐x )BCZT‐(x )BCST ceramics, thorough investigation of phase formation and phase‐stability using XRD, Rietveld refinement, Raman spectroscopy, high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and temperature‐dependent dielectric measurements provide conclusive evidence for the coexistence of orthorhombic + tetragonal (Amm2 +P4mm ) phases at room temperature. The steady transition ofAmm2 crystal symmetry toP4mm crystal symmetry with increasingx content is also demonstrated by Rietveld refinement data and related analyses. The phase transition temperatures, rhombohedral‐orthorhombic (TR‐O), orthorhombic‐ tetragonal (TO‐T), and tetragonal‐cubic (TC), gradually shift toward lower temperature with increasingx content. For (1‐x )BCZT‐(x )BCST ceramics, significantly improved dielectric and ferroelectric properties are observed, including relatively high dielectric constantε r≈ 1900–3300 (near room temperature),ε r≈ 8800–12 900 (near Curie temperature), dielectric loss, tanδ ≈ 0.01–0.02, remanent polarizationP r≈ 9.4–14 µC cm−2, coercive electric fieldE c≈ 2.5–3.6 kV cm−1. Further, high electric field‐induced strainS ≈ 0.12–0.175%, piezoelectric charge coefficientd 33≈ 296–360 pC N−1, converse piezoelectric coefficient ≈ 240–340 pm V−1, planar electromechanical coupling coefficientk p≈ 0.34–0.45, and electrostrictive coefficient (Q 33)avg≈ 0.026–0.038 m4C−2are attained. Output performance with respect to mechanical energy demonstrates that the (0.6)BCZT‐(0.4)BCST composition (x = 0.4) displays better efficiency for generating electrical energy and, thus, the synthesized lead‐free piezoelectric (1‐x )BCZT‐(x )BCST samples are suitable for energy harvesting applications. The results and analyses point to the outcome that the (1‐x )BCZT‐(x )BCST ceramics as a potentially strong contender within the family of Pb‐free piezoelectric materials for future electronics and energy harvesting device technologies. -
Abstract Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM) based techniques probe material properties over microscale regions with nanoscale resolution, ultimately resulting in investigation of mesoscale functionalities. Among SPM techniques, piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) is a highly effective tool in exploring polarization switching in ferroelectric materials. However, its signal is also sensitive to sample‐dependent electrostatic and chemo‐electromechanical changes. Literature reports have often concentrated on the evaluation of the
Off‐field piezoresponse, compared toOn‐field piezoresponse, based on the latter's increased sensitivity to non‐ferroelectric contributions. Using machine learning approaches incorporatingboth Off‐ andOn‐field piezoresponse response as well asOff‐field resonance frequency to maximize information, switching piezoresponse in a defect‐rich Pb(Zr,Ti)O3thin film is investigated. As expected, one major contributor to the piezoresponse is mostly ferroelectric, coupled with electrostatic phenomena duringOn‐field measurements. A second component is electrostatic in nature, while a third component is likely due to a superposition of multiple non‐ferroelectric processes. The proposed approach will enable deeper understanding of switching phenomena in weakly ferroelectric samples and materials with large chemo‐electromechanical response. -
Abstract Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) is used for investigation of the electromechanical behavior of the head‐to‐head (H‐H) and tail‐to‐tail (T‐T) domain walls on the non‐polar surfaces of three uniaxial ferroelectric materials with different crystal structures: LiNbO3, Pb5Ge3O11, and ErMnO3. It is shown that, contrary to the common expectation that the domain walls should not exhibit any PFM response on the non‐polar surface, an out‐of‐plane deformation of the crystal at the H‐H and T‐T domain walls occurs even in the absence of the out‐of‐plane polarization component due to a specific form of the piezoelectric tensor. In spite of their different symmetry, in all studied materials, the dominant contribution comes from the counteracting shear strains on both sides of the H‐H and T‐T domain walls. The finite element analysis approach that takes into account a contribution of all elements in the piezoelectric tensor, is applicable to any ferroelectric material and can be instrumental for getting a new insight into the coupling between the electromechanical and electronic properties of the charged ferroelectric domain walls.
-
Abstract Deterministic control of the intrinsic polarization state of ferroelectric thin films is essential for device applications. Independently of the well‐established role of electrostatic boundary conditions and epitaxial strain, the importance of growth temperature as a tool to stabilize a target polarization state during thin film growth is shown here. Full control of the intrinsic polarization orientation of PbTiO3thin films is demonstrated—from monodomain up, through polydomain, to monodomain down as imaged by piezoresponse force microscopy—using changes in the film growth temperature. X‐ray diffraction and scanning transmission electron microscopy reveal a variation of
c ‐axis related to out‐of‐plane strain gradients. These measurements, supported by Ginzburg–Landau–Devonshire free energy calculations and Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy, point to a defect mediated polarization gradient initiated by a temperature dependent effective built‐in field during growth, allowing polarization control not only under specific growth conditions, but ex‐situ, for subsequent processing and device applications. -
Abstract Application of scanning probe microscopy techniques such as piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) opens the possibility to re‐visit the ferroelectrics previously studied by the macroscopic electrical testing methods and establish a link between their local nanoscale characteristics and integral response. The nanoscale PFM studies and phase field modeling of the static and dynamic behavior of the domain structure in the well‐known ferroelectric material lead germanate, Pb5Ge3O11, are reported. Several unusual phenomena are revealed: 1) domain formation during the paraelectric‐to‐ferroelectric phase transition, which exhibits an atypical cooling rate dependence; 2) unexpected electrically induced formation of the oblate domains due to the preferential domain walls motion in the directions perpendicular to the polar axis, contrary to the typical domain growth behavior observed so far; 3) absence of the bound charges at the 180° head‐to‐head (H–H) and tail‐totail (T–T) domain walls, which typically exhibit a significant charge density in other ferroelectrics due to the polarization discontinuity. This strikingly different behavior is rationalized by the phase field modeling of the dynamics of uncharged H–H and T–T domain walls. The results provide a new insight into the emergent physics of the ferroelectric domain boundaries, revealing unusual properties not exhibited by conventional Ising‐type walls.