skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Rerooting Trees Increases Opportunities for Concurrent Computation and Results in Markedly Improved Performance for Phylogenetic Inference
Parallel computing algorithms benefit from in- creases in concurrency when the hardware capacity is being under utilized. For likelihood-based molecular evolution in- ferences this can be due to small problem sizes, or because hardware capacity has increased beyond dataset sizes. A central concept in this domain is a bifurcating tree, which represents evolutionary relationships. The topology of the tree being evaluated directly affects the degree of parallelism that can be exploited by likelihood-based algorithms. For time-reversible evolutionary models we can reroot an unbalanced tree in order to make it more symmetric, without affecting the likelihood. Based on the reduction in number of concurrent operation sets, we define a best-case theoretical expectations, based on tree size and topology, for speedup due to rerooting which approaches 2-fold as the number of tip nodes increases for pectinate trees, and much higher values for some random topologies as the number of tip nodes increases. Empirical results using the NVIDIA CUDA implementation of the BEAGLE library confirm the merit of this approach. For pectinate trees we observe speedups of up to 1.93-fold due to rerooting and even larger speedups for random trees for the core likelihood-evaluation function in BEAGLE.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1661443
PAR ID:
10061764
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops
Page Range / eLocation ID:
247-256
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. We describe our approach in augmenting the BEAGLE library for high-performance statistical phylogenetic inference to support concurrent computation of independent partial likelihoods arrays. Our solution involves identifying independent likelihood estimates in analyses of partitioned datasets and in proposed tree topologies, and configuring concurrent computation of these likelihoods via CUDA and OpenCLl frameworks. We evaluate the effect of each increase in concurrency on throughput performance for our partial likelihoods kernel for a four-state nucleotide substitution model on a variety of parallel computing hardware, such as NVIDIA and AMD GPUs, and Intel multicore CPUs, observing up to 16-fold speedups over our previous implementation. Finally, we evaluate the effect of these gains on an domain application program, mrbayes. For a partitioned nucleotide-model analysis we observe an average speedup for the overall run time of 2.1-fold over our previous parallel implementation, and 10-fold over the native mrbayes with sse. 
    more » « less
  2. Random forests use ensembles of decision trees to boost accuracy for machine learning tasks. However, large ensembles slow down inference on platforms that process each tree in an ensemble individually. We present Bolt, a platform that restructures whole random forests, not just individual trees, to speed up inference. Conceptually, Bolt maps every path in each tree to a lookup table which, if cache were large enough, would allow inference with just one memory access. When the size of the lookup table exceeds cache capacity, Bolt employs a novel combination of lossless compression, parameter selection, and bloom filters to shrink the table while preserving fast inference. We compared inference speed in Bolt to three state-of-the-art platforms: Python Scikit-Learn, Ranger, and Forest Packing. We evaluated these platforms using datasets with vision, natural language processing and categorical applications. We observed that on ensembles of shallow decision trees Bolt can run 2-14X faster than competing platforms and that Bolt's speedups persist as the number of decision trees in an ensemble increases. 
    more » « less
  3. Satta, Yoko (Ed.)
    Abstract Likelihood-based tests of phylogenetic trees are a foundation of modern systematics. Over the past decade, an enormous wealth and diversity of model-based approaches have been developed for phylogenetic inference of both gene trees and species trees. However, while many techniques exist for conducting formal likelihood-based tests of gene trees, such frameworks are comparatively underdeveloped and underutilized for testing species tree hypotheses. To date, widely used tests of tree topology are designed to assess the fit of classical models of molecular sequence data and individual gene trees and thus are not readily applicable to the problem of species tree inference. To address this issue, we derive several analogous likelihood-based approaches for testing topologies using modern species tree models and heuristic algorithms that use gene tree topologies as input for maximum likelihood estimation under the multispecies coalescent. For the purpose of comparing support for species trees, these tests leverage the statistical procedures of their original gene tree-based counterparts that have an extended history for testing phylogenetic hypotheses at a single locus. We discuss and demonstrate a number of applications, limitations, and important considerations of these tests using simulated and empirical phylogenomic data sets that include both bifurcating topologies and reticulate network models of species relationships. Finally, we introduce the open-source R package SpeciesTopoTestR (SpeciesTopology Tests in R) that includes a suite of functions for conducting formal likelihood-based tests of species topologies given a set of input gene tree topologies. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic inference is widely used in phylogenomics. As heuristic searches most likely find suboptimal trees, it is recommended to conduct multiple (e.g., 10) tree searches in phylogenetic analyses. However, beyond its positive role, how and to what extent multiple tree searches aid ML phylogenetic inference remains poorly explored. Here, we found that a random starting tree was not as effective as the BioNJ and parsimony starting trees in inferring the ML gene tree and that RAxML-NG and PhyML were less sensitive to different starting trees than IQ-TREE. We then examined the effect of the number of tree searches on ML tree inference with IQ-TREE and RAxML-NG, by running 100 tree searches on 19,414 gene alignments from 15 animal, plant, and fungal phylogenomic datasets. We found that the number of tree searches substantially impacted the recovery of the best-of-100 ML gene tree topology among 100 searches for a given ML program. In addition, all of the concatenation-based trees were topologically identical if the number of tree searches was ≥10. Quartet-based ASTRAL trees inferred from 1 to 80 tree searches differed topologically from those inferred from 100 tree searches for 6/15 phylogenomic datasets. Finally, our simulations showed that gene alignments with lower difficulty scores had a higher chance of finding the best-of-100 gene tree topology and were more likely to yield the correct trees. 
    more » « less
  5. Yoshida, Ruriko (Ed.)
    Phylogenetic trees are fundamental for understanding evolutionary history. However, finding maximum likelihood trees is challenging due to the complexity of the likelihood landscape and the size of tree space. Based on the Billera-Holmes-Vogtmann (BHV) distance between trees, we describe a method to generate intermediate trees on the shortest path between two trees, called pathtrees. These pathtrees give a structured way to generate and visualize part of treespace. They allow investigating intermediate regions between trees of interest, exploring locally optimal trees in topological clusters of treespace, and potentially finding trees of high likelihood unexplored by tree search algorithms. We compared our approach against other tree search tools (P aup *, RA x ML, and R ev B ayes ) using the highest likelihood trees and number of new topologies found, and validated the accuracy of the generated treespace. We assess our method using two datasets. The first consists of 23 primate species (CytB, 1141 bp), leading to well-resolved relationships. The second is a dataset of 182 milksnakes (CytB, 1117 bp), containing many similar sequences and complex relationships among individuals. Our method visualizes the treespace using log likelihood as a fitness function. It finds similarly optimal trees as heuristic methods and presents the likelihood landscape at different scales. It found relevant trees that were not found with MCMC methods. The validation measures indicated that our method performed well mapping treespace into lower dimensions. Our method complements heuristic search analyses, and the visualization allows the inspection of likelihood terraces and exploration of treespace areas not visited by heuristic searches. 
    more » « less